Their Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds


I don’t think any sane person should think the Democratic Party cares for poor black people. Why? Because they don’t care one bit; but they say they do. They have done nothing for the black community. Under Bush minority home ownership is at record highs. Poverty is the same as it was under Clinton. And this will shock you liberals: Entitlement spending under Bush far exceeds that of Clinton.

Democrats constantly want to raise taxes especially on the rich. Yet many of them, like Ted Kennedy, avoid paying taxes on their fortunes by shipping their money to off-shore accounts. Ted Kennedy also refused alternative energy in his state because it was on land his family uses for vacations.

Literally one year the Dems are making a better case for the war in Iraq then President Bush is; the next year they are claiming Bush lied to you. Even though if Bush lied to you that means they lied to you. Quotes you can use. But, no informed person believes that Bush actually lied; if you do believe he lied then please prove it. Although, according to all investigations dealing with Iraq and pre-war Intel, including the 9-11 commission, the bi-partisan Intelligence Capabilities Report, as well as the Senate Investigation, have all clearly stated Bush did not lie. So if you have secret info that all of those bi-partisan investigations do not have, please provide it here.

The Democratic Party has a history of Defense and Intelligence budget cuts: yet they blame President Bush when he uses bad information from those same agencies that they cut. The biggest failure on 9-11, according to the 9-11 commission, was the lack of good Intel including human intelligence. Well, guess who cut the budget and caused a drastic reduction of clandestine operatives in Europe and the Middle East.

Think about the fact that the Democratic Party has run one Campaign for the last 40 years. They run on healthcare, poverty, medicare, education in every single campaign. What does that tell you? They care about those issues…Maybe. More importantly, it tells you that for 40 years the democrats have failed on every single issue that they claim to have a moral superiority on. They yell better education, hospitals, healthcare but they have not done anything about those issues. They simply use those key words to gain votes. And it works on you liberals every time.

Indoctrination of Our Nation

Many people believe, rightly so, that many US colleges promote anti-military, anti-American leftist propaganda. The most publicized case of this was Ward Churchill at the University of Colorado, Boulder. This is what he said about the WTC victims on 9-11: “They were targeting those people I referred to as 'little Eichmanns. These were legitimate targets.” He means the innocent people in the WTC deserved to die. He, to this day, still makes over $100,000 a year at the tax payers expense. So, in effect we are paying for students to be indoctrinated by the radical left.

Recently, a Warren County Community College professor named John Daly verbally attacked a young student. In an e-mail sent to Rebecca Beach, Daly had this to say:
"Real freedom will come when soldiers in Iraq turn their guns on their superiors..." he also vowed “"to expose [her] right-wing, anti-people politics until groups like [Rebecca's] won't dare show their face on a college campus." He said this in response to Rebecca’s attempt to bring an Iraq war veteran to speak at the campus during Veterans Day. Unfortunately, there are many professors that share Daly’s twisted views of reality but are not dumb enough to publicly voice them. Boy would I love to run into someone like John Daly.

The murmurings of the so-called cultural elite have now been exposed. For years, impressionable young people have had to put up with instructors like Ward Churchill, John Daly and all of these:
Campus Watch. I can assure you of one thing; if a college professor said to me, that “real freedom will only come when soldiers kill their commanders”, I would walk straight down the stairs then straight up to him, and hit him right in the face. These types of incidences affect me so deeply, that as I type, I can barely keep from smashing my keyboard.

The psychology of the far left is beyond intelligent study. I suppose insanity is not the right description of these people, but its close.
Read more of their insanity

Dear Crazy Left: Before The War In Iraq






1993, Feb. 26: The World Trade Center was bombed by Al Qaeda. Six people killed and over 1,000 injured.

1993, Oct. 4: 18 US servicemen killed by an Al Qaeda-trained Somalia militia
1996, June 25: 19 US servicemen killed in an attack on a US military housing complex in Saudi Arabia. Al Qaeda and Hezbollah were involved.
1998, Feb. 22: Osama Bin Laden issues fatwa against the United States. Bin Laden calls on every Muslim to kill Americans.
1998, Aug. 7: 222 people killed in an Al Qaeda attack on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
2000, Oct. 12: 17 American sailors killed in a suicide attack on the USS Cole perpetrated by Al Qaeda.
2001, Sept. 11: 3,000 people murdered in the worst attack on US soil.

It seems we were at war long before Iraq. Iraq was not the catalyst for terrorism as many liberals like to claim. Any person who thinks our action in Iraq has made us less safe is obviously ignorant of history. This war on terrorism was waged long before George Bush was elected into office and will continue long after his term expires. The appeasement of terrorism displayed during the Clinton Administration was unhelpful in stemming attacks from Al Qaeda, as you can clearly see. So, you unrealistic peace lovers might consider reality for a change. Hey, I’m all for peace… When Americans aren’t being attacked and when a dictator has not used WMD on more than a dozen occasions. Or like Hillary Clinton said, “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock; His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members.” (which is true) I’m all for peace when UN resolutions are being taken seriously and the UN is not systematically corrupt. Remember, when Americans were being attacked in an unrecognized war on terror, we were not in Iraq. At the time, according to liberal logic, we were in an illegal and immoral war launched by Clinton in Kosovo and Bosnia.

Let’s all recognize this. We have not yet been attacked on US soil again. Al Qaeda has called Iraq the central front in this war. Libya voluntarily gave up its WMD program. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Yemen and others have cracked down on Terrorists. Afghanistan has been liberated and elections have been hugely successful. America is truly greeted as liberators there and Afghanistan is now a true ally of the United States. Iraq is still chaotic but that’s really only due to our enemy’s realization that they are losing and need to put up the fight of their lives. But even with the carnage these Insurgents are causing, the Iraqi people have participated in historic elections; formed a constitution; began the political processes of governance; and have taken huge steps in forming a new country. Most importantly, we need to remember this war on terror is serious. Don’t let the Iraqis down like the peace movement let over 3,000,000 slaughtered Cambodians and S. Vietnamese down. The future is at stake and an entire region is at stake.

Daily Show vs The Colbert Report

A) The Colbert Report is funny. Unlike the Daily show, the Colbert Report uses clever jokes and timing. The Daily show has now become unoriginal. Jon Stewart is predictable and I can write better material than their left-wing writers. Some think it’s clever but I can only assume those people vote democrat; or are high.

B) The Colbert report is what the Daily Show used to be; a satire driven comedy about all types of issues. The daily show has turned into an arm of the Democratic Party. I watch and read every major news outlet as well as the two comedy central programs. I know what type of news the writers at Stewart's show are going to use to miss-inform their viewers. It will be attacks on the Republican Party and on the President; it’s very typical. Given that the Democratic Party, as a whole, make themselves look like idiots, you would think that type of thing should be in the show. The material you can use on how major Democrats have completely ignored their pre-war statements is Gold. Make jokes about how the democrats lie with every breath and how people actually still buy into what they are saying. That’s funny!

C) Although I think Jon Stewart is very funny, Steven Colbert just has a better delivery. He is smarter than Jon so that might allow him to think quicker on his feet. What is horrifying to me, and most news junkies, is that many young people actually think the Daily show is a real source of news. Many young people get their news from Comedy Central. Think about that. That’s funnier than the Daily Show and Colbert Report combined.

Oh Holiday Tree, Oh Holiday Tree…


What the Hell is going on in this country. In Boston Massachusetts, a 48 foot Christmas tree was renamed…guess what… a Holiday tree!! Because Christ is evil and the name Christmas offends up-tight atheists. “OHHH, my ears, my ears! They’re bleeding from having to hear Christmas tree! Ohhh”

The tree was cut down by a Nova Scotia logger and donated to the not so great city of Boston. According to Reuters, the man who chopped the tree was very upset at the renaming and said, "If they decide it should be a holiday tree, I'll tell them to send it back. If it was a holiday tree, you might as well put it up at Easter." The mayor of Boston, to his credit, said he would call it a Christmas tree no matter what.

I’m curious… is anyone actually offended by the word Christmas? I know there are a lot of insane people in this world, but I have never met or heard from someone offended by a Christmas tree. Call me crazy, but I blame this on political correctness, which of course is an extension of liberalism.

“Political correctness is inverted McCarthyism” –Dennis Miller-


“The Corruptible”


The United Nations has recently cancelled an upcoming visit to Guantanamo Bay because it says the United States refused to allow for private questioning of terrorist detainees. The United Nations, the most corrupt organization on the planet, has been whining all year to have access to Gitmo. They were finally allowed to bring investigators in, but because they didn’t like the terms and conditions, they decided to make a political statement and refuse to send inspectors. They fought for this chance because they felt it could damage the United States and the military. The UN is anxious to take fabricated accounts from terrorist suspects in order to post that information all over the media. The propaganda war is in effect all over the world and the UN is willing to spew terrorist rhetoric to try and save face in light of their horrid corruption. The UN claimed they were being denied “just, objective and credible time with detainees”

Keep in Mind that the Red Cross International Committee has been given total access to all prisoners and are allowed private time. Also keep in mind that Al Qaeda’s training manual clearly calls for all captured members to claim torture. They do this because they [Al Qaeda] understand that the anti-American media in Europe and the left-wing media in America will gladly use that claim to damage the military and the President. This tool of miss-information has already been utilized countless times. The hoards of miss-informed Euro-fascist liberals have already bought into the concept that America is evil and more dangerous than Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. Basically, many people in the world are willing to buy into the claims of a captured terrorist and therefore, allowing the UN or some anti-American organization to capitalize on that reality, would be a mistake.

The Honest Democrat (one of the few)









Joseph Lieberman spoke to Iraqi leaders yesterday to assure them that despite his colleagues constant undermining of American troops, we will not leave until the Iraqis themselves can ensure their own safety. The Jewish politician assured the Iraqi Prime minister that US forces will stay in Iraq until the mission is complete. "We cannot let extremists and terrorists, a small number, here in Iraq deprive the 27 million Iraqis of what they want which is a better freer life, safer life for themselves and their children," Lieberman said.

Speaking to reporters, Lieberman mentioned the progress being made in Iraq and said there was little support for Congressman Murtha’s call to immediately withdraw troops. Lieberman, one of the very few honest Democrats, has been a staunch supporter of the war in Iraq; and unlike nearly all of his colleagues he has yet to flip-flop on his pre-war comments. He, like every other Democrat, made their war decision based on the massive amount of evidence provided by US, French, Russian, and British Intelligence agencies.

Ted Kennedy (before the war 2002): "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed."

John Kerry (before the war 2002): "The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons.”

J. Rockefeller (before the war 2002): "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years.”

Breaking News! Kerry Won The Election



Opinionnation-
John Kerry was serving a summons for a court case involving a car accident and was unanimously elected…. JURY FOREMAN!

“I’m John Kerry.. and I’m reporting for Jury Duty”

Kerry campaigned for the leadership position claiming that the current Foreman misled the jury into kicking Jim (juror # 6) in the shins. He argued, quite longwindedly, that the War in the courtroom was only leading to more car accidents and that the UN must oversee their deliberation. Kerry and his backers deployed filmmaker/propagandist Michael Moore to persuade the court that although, Kerry was for car accidents before he was against them, he still has what it takes to be a great leader.

Congratulations John Kerry…You’ve actually won something! now go home

Secret Memo: Bomb Al Jazeera


The Mirror in the UK finally admitted what we all knew to be true. The BBC [like many European news agencies] is no better than Al Jazeera. A report filed by the Mirror claims that George Bush wanted to bomb Al Jazeera’s headquarters in Iraq. They of course were attacking the Bush administration in the article but in a grand Freudian slip, they allowed their alliance to the insurgency to seep out. The article claimed, “To have wiped them out would have been equivalent to bombing the BBC in London…” Al Jazeera is known to be an arm of the Iraq insurgency as well as a constant companion of Al Qaeda. The “news agency” frequently aids in spreading the propaganda of Al Qaeda while fueling our enemy’s hatred towards innocent Iraqis and the United States. So, in that way…Al Jazeera is exactly like the BBC. If Al Jazeera was targeted by the US it would probably be late at night where collateral damage would be minimal. That would be fine with me given that Al Jazeera causes more death, destruction, and hatred than what would be caused if their news building was taken out.

The BBC, like the Mirror, is a tool of the fascist left-wing ideology that enveloped Western Europe nearly a decade ago. A constant propagandist attitude towards the United States and the War in Iraq in their reporting is usually their MO. Al Jazeera shares that characteristic but takes it past the extreme. Al Jazeera needs to be immediately taken out. However, a more advanced way would be a better choice. Jamming their communication towers or sabotaging their infrastructure sounds more reasonable.

Send More Troops!


As America is entrenched in Iraq and American soldiers are dying, we at home, are being attacked with liberal rhetoric as well. A continual undermining of this war effort has been organized by far-left entities with the sole objective of losing the war in Iraq in order to gain politically in the next election. This type of disgraceful action is well-known but the question still remains: Should we pull out of Iraq now; wait until the job is completely done; or draw back troops while encouraging the Iraqis to take more responsibility?

I am growing weary of the situation in Iraq. I think the best possible solution is to WIN! I support my President nearly 100% but I have to admit that I’m very tired of having to read about US service people being killed. In order for us to win, like we need to win, we need to send more troops to Iraq. There are three major priorities that need to be taken care of. First, should be training and equipping the new Iraqi Army. The second priority, which is not being handled, is securing the borders of Iraq. The third priority is, of course, safety and security. The way I see it; is that Priority # 1 is not going very well. The Iraqi Army is very slowly coming together. The recent estimation of the US army command apparatus is that it will take a couple of years for the Iraqi army to be properly organized, equipped, and ran with adequate Iraqi leadership. That is unacceptable; not only to me but it should be unacceptable to the American people. Priority # 2 has not even been seriously addressed by the administration. IEDs are the main killer of US troops. Those IEDs have been brought across the Syrian and Iranian borders. Hell, actual terrorists are being funneled through these borders. Nothing is being done about that! Priority # 3 is safety and security. Of course you can’t have safety and security if the Iraqis aren’t trained and Iraq’s borders are open for insurgents and weaponry to flow freely.

President Bush better realize this situation is not going to die down. Real action is now needed to make Iraq what I think it could be. Send more troops!

Before the War in Iraq

1993, Feb. 26: The World Trade Center was bombed by Al Qaeda. Six people killed and over 1,000 injured.
1993, Oct. 4: 18 US servicemen killed by an Al Qaeda-trained Somalia militia
1996, June 25: 19 US servicemen killed in an attack on a US military housing complex in Saudi Arabia. Al Qaeda and Hezbollah were involved
1998, Feb. 22: Osama Bin Laden issues fatwa against the United States. Bin Laden calls on every Muslim to kill Americans.
1998, Aug. 7: 222 people killed in an Al Qaeda attack on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania
2000, Oct. 12: 17 American sailors killed in a suicide attack on the USS Cole perpetrated by Al Qaeda.
2001, Sept. 11: 3,000 people murdered in the worst attack on US soil.

It seems we were at war long before Iraq. Iraq was not the catalyst for terrorism as many liberals like to claim. Any person who thinks our action in Iraq has made us less safe is obviously ignorant of history. This war on terrorism was waged long before George Bush was elected into office and will continue long after his term expires. The appeasement of terrorism displayed during the Clinton Administration was unhelpful in stemming attacks from Al Qaeda, as you can clearly see. So, you unrealistic peace lovers might consider reality for a change. Hey, I’m all for peace… When Americans aren’t being attacked and when a dictator has not used WMD on more than a dozen occasions. Or like Hillary Clinton said, “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock; His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members.” (which is true) I’m all for peace when UN resolutions are being taken seriously and the UN is not systematically corrupt. Remember, when Americans were being attacked in an unrecognized war on terror, we were not in Iraq. At the time, according to liberal logic, we were in an illegal and immoral war launched by Clinton in Kosovo and Bosnia.

Let’s all recognize this. We have not yet been attacked on US soil again. Al Qaeda has called Iraq the central front in this war. Libya voluntarily gave up its WMD program. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Yemen and others have cracked down on Terrorists. Afghanistan has been liberated and elections have been hugely successful. America is truly greeted as liberators there and Afghanistan is now a true ally of the United States. Iraq is still chaotic but that’s really only due to our enemy’s realization that they are losing and need to put up the fight of their lives. But even with the carnage these Insurgents are causing, the Iraqi people have participated in historic elections; formed a constitution; began the political processes of governance; and have taken huge steps in forming a new country. Most importantly, we need to remember this war on terror is serious. Don’t let the Iraqis down like the peace movement let over 3,000,000 slaughtered Cambodians and S. Vietnamese down. The future is at stake and an entire region is at stake.

Visit my main Site: http://opinionnation.modblog.com

The ACLU in 2003 filed a lawsuit against the government demanding to be given more photographs of the prisoner “abuse” at Abu Grhaib. The photos were being withheld by the Government because they will of course be used by the far-left and its teammate Al Qaida to stir up more Anti-American sentiment throughout the world. The ACLU, The American Civil Liberties Union has been a political tool first and foremost and has put its American civil liberties duty on the backburner.

The American people have overwhelmingly supported the treatment of prisoners during this war and a significant number of Americans feel they are being treated better than they deserve. With that being said, the ACLU has won its case to have these photos released and will certainly use them to their benefit. We as country all know what took place at Abu Grhaib and we all know what the pictures are going to reveal. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein ruled Thursday that the photographs and four videotapes must be released. He wrote, “"Our nation does not surrender to blackmail, and fear of blackmail is not a legally sufficient argument to prevent us from performing a statutory command…" I’m not sure what that means but I do know what these photographs and videotapes are going to be used for. They will be used to demonize the American Military and the Bush administration for the express purpose of hurting the military’s ability to fight this war. There are certain organizations in this country who truly do want us to fail in Iraq simply because the commander In Chief is George W. Bush. That is obvious because if this war were being led by Bill Clinton the ACLU would not be systematically undermining the effort.