Democratic Desperation

NSA Leak Probe
I’m sure the far left in this country are excited about the Justice Department beginning its investigation of who leaked vital National Security information to the NY Times. We saw their feigned outrage over the leaking of the name of Valerie Plame to Robert Novak, now we’re sure to see their outrage at this obviously more important Intelligence leak… Well, at least if the Democratic Party wasn’t the epitome of hypocrisy, we would see it.

I have yet to hear the Democrats yell and whine about an illegal outing of secret prisons [black sites] in Europe and the ousting of classified information on CIA plane routes transporting terrorist suspects. You heard them claim that releasing Valerie Plame’s CIA status put her and the CIA in danger. Why haven’t we heard them yelling about how giving our terrorist enemy vital information like prison facilities and plane routes, put the CIA and our military in danger? Why the silence when the New York Times releases an illegal leak that clearly damages our National Security. Why the fake outrage with the Valerie Plame case and the silence when the CIA and the American people are truly endangered? The answer is very telling of the current Democratic Party’s willingness to damage the nation for political gain. There is no excuse for this hypocrisy. Since the illegal disclosure of this wiretapping program can possibly hurt the President and might possibly allow the Democrats to get more votes, they are perfectly fine with putting America in danger. Their willingness to politicize this incident for a perceived short term political advantage is why I dislike the Democratic Party. They’re desperate, so they are willing to throw National Security out the window and it’s obvious.

From Whiny Democrat to the "DarkSide"

I’m in college and a Government major who happens to be Republican. However, this was not always so. I was a Democrat in my high school days and a very convincing one at that. I was actually in a government class during the 2000 presidential election. It was probably one of the most unique experiences of my high school education even though my actual schooling took a back seat to sports. It’s funny because in my government class we had mock presidential debates and guess who was chosen to speak as Al Gore. Yep, I had the challenge of making Al Gore seem intelligible and a better candidate then George Bush. Believe it or not, at that time I was like the typical Bush-hater. I used to hate George Bush. Back then I was really na├»ve in terms of politics so I basically did what I claim Liberals do all the time, which is to believe whatever is said in the media and by Bush’s political opponents. So, what was it that turned me to the “Dark side?” What turned this Bush-hating, Democrat loving guy into what people call a right-wing zealot? (Other than me realizing that the Democrats are wrong about nearly everything)

On September 11, 2001 this nation was attacked by an enemy who has lurked within our midst for over a decade. On this day my world view and political perspective changed. No longer was I willing to be told what to believe and no longer was I willing to hate my president. The bold policies of President Bush and his willingness to act despite political attacks and propaganda from his opponents were key reasons in my changing political perspective. His passionate speech at ground zero is among the greatest speeches a president has ever given. Click here to see it in Windows Media Player or watch it on my sidebar. Bush Rallies New York: CNN Video

After this Ground Zero Address I knew President Bush was the right President for our time. Like Reagan before him, Bush’s foreign policy is despised by the left and by other countries. But, like Ronald Reagan, George Bush has a chance to affect change that will be remembered throughout history. Afghanistan is a functioning Democracy despite the Democrats claims of it being a quagmire. Despite the naysayers saying that the Middle East isn’t ready to be free; the historic pace of cultural progress being witnessed throughout the Middle East is continuing. I’m not saying that this progress will lead to definite reforms but anyone who says that this is not worth the effort, is not a true humanitarian. George Bush has the potential of being one of the greatest presidents in American History. We should all hope, despite our political background, that our effort to reform the Middle East into a freer region helps humanity.

Americans Want Wiretapping

The majority of Americans believe the NSA should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects in other countries and people living in the United States. 64% of Americans think this type of spying should be allowed and only 26% of Americans think George Bush is the only president to authorize this type of Spying. Almost 50% of people believe, as they should, that President Bush is not the first president to use this method of surveillance. Rasmussen Poll Result

I expect this poll result to be on the front page of the New York Times. We all know how intensely the Times has been covering the wiretapping of suspected terrorists on their front pages. I suspect, now that the American people have weighed in on the issue, the NY Times will be as adamant with publishing this poll as they were when they revealed covert prisons in Europe and secret CIA plane routes and disclosed how the Government tracks terrorists through wiretapping. Somehow I doubt the Times will run this story...maybe it's just me.

So, it seems the American people aren’t as dumb as most on the left want them to be. Like I have said before, the majority of Americans understand the need to track suspected terrorists. The constant undermining of our terrorist-fighting efforts, that is being perpetrated by the far-left and the media, is dangerous and treasonous. If only we can get mainstream Democrats to come to their senses we might be able to stop the far-left from aiding the enemy.

Blame America!

Our unfriendly neighbors to the north are now blaming America for its violence. I guess given their insane mental state it’s not really surprising. Canada Blames America for Shooting.

The mayor of Toronto, where a mall shooting took place said, "It's a sign that the lack of gun laws in the U.S. is allowing guns to flood across the border that are literally being used to kill people in the streets of Toronto.”

He went on to say,"The U.S. is exporting its problem of violence to the streets of Toronto."

“…ensure that Canadian cities do not descend into the kind of rampant gun violence we have seen elsewhere," the Prime minister of Canada said.

So once again it’s America’s fault for people’s actions. Blame America for a kid shooting someone in the streets of Toronto. Canada thinks it’s some type of moral haven where pretty elves and hobbits make home. I’m getting tired of these countries, which only exists because of the United States, running their mouths as if they know something. Did you know that over 70 percent of Canadians hate George Bush and 40 percent feel he is more of a threat to world peace the Osama Bin Laden? That only shows what we all knew to be true and that is Canadians, at least 70% of them, are America-haters. Can you believe that 40% of Canadians think Bush is the threat to world peace? Well, given that the Canadian version of world peace involves turning away from mass rape, torture and genocide, it's not surprising. They're hypocrites because they claim morality but that morality comes with allowing genocide. I guess according to these people, it’s OK to murder hundreds of thousands of people as long as it’s under a dictatorship. “Watch out America, Saddam has a sovereign right to kill its people so don’t mess with him you meanies. America you’re the war criminal for overthrowing our lovely genocidal dictatorship. We Canuks don't mind genocide but hate America because it’s a threat to world peace.” It’s most likely a deep seeded psychological disorder that causes such actions. It’s like Canada is in denial and the only way they know to cope with reality is to blame America. America has become their way to stay happy without having to face the fact that some Canadians are killers. It’s like their own “blame the black man mentality.” We pure white people would never do such a thing and if we did it’s because the black man made us.

So we caused an individual to shoot someone in Toronto and we are a bigger threat to world peace than Osama Bin Laden. What a world we live in when Democrats in this country start sounding like Canadians and visa versa. Canada, land of the snow and home of the Haters. "Pro sovereign dictatorship and genocide but Anti-American"

Colin Powell and Domestic Spying

Yesterday on ABC Colin Powell commented on the fact that President Bush authorized domestic spying.

“But I'm very aware, from my earlier incarnation as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and as a national security advisor, of these kinds of activities.

And in the aftermath of 9/11, the American people had one concern, and that was to protect us. And so, I see absolutely nothing wrong with the president authorizing these kinds of actions.”

He went on to say that it wouldn’t have been hard to get the warrants, “But for reasons that the president has discussed and the attorney general has spoken to, they chose not to do it that way, and they have briefed members of the Congress over the years on this program.”

So what does this mean? To me it means that an honorable individual who has had major disagreements with President Bush has put the controversy to rest. He has said what most people believe; that this program was very necessary in the fight against terrorism, and legal. Although, that’s not going to stop a certain political party that has aided our enemy for nearly a year now but it will help to isolate their selective outrage. The Democrats deny being weak on terrorism but they can’t stop themselves from supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations. And you know what’s interesting; this type of wiretapping would be less necessary if the Democratic Party had not dismantled our Intelligence gathering capability. When you drastically slash the budgets for the organizations that provide life saving Intelligence then complain when that agency is left only to use wiretaps, you must be a democrat.

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays

Qualifications For a Liberal Blog

Lately, I have been visiting more blogs through Blog Explosion and blog clicker and I have realized something about the liberal blogger… They’re insane! (no offense)

Qualifications to be a liberal blogger:


1. Hypocrisy must run deep within your blood.
2. You have to have a dumb “impeach Bush” tag at the corner of your blog
3. You hate Fox News because someone told you to hate Fox News.
4. You don’t think the Media is biased
5. You have to say Bush is corrupt or else you wont fit in
6. The Valerie Plame leak is worse then outlining secret prisons and plane routes of the CIA.
7. Insanity is a must
8. Bush killed 2,000 soldiers in Iraq not Al Qaeda and Insurgents.
9. you have to say The war is for oil or else your mind explodes from trying to think for yourself
10. Democrats were magically tricked into voting for the war and the Patriot Act
11. You have to think Al Franken is funny and understands politics.
12. You must get your news from a comedy show on Comedy Central
13. You have to be dumb enough to think Democrats care about the poor
14. You have to think that Hitler is more comparable to George Bush than to Saddam Hussein.
15. You have to blame Bush for everything even a Hurricane
16. You have to actually believe Fahrenheit 9-11 was an accurate accounting of the Bush Administration
17. Whine! You must whine!

Spy vs. Spy

Clinton launched an illegal and immoral war in Bosnia and Kosovo, appeased terrorism, lied (and I’m not talking about Monica), killed innocent civilians in Iraq, bombed Iraq on the same Intel Bush used, made regime change in Iraq US policy, divided the country, is a redneck from Arkansas, Pardoned hundreds of criminals, Halliburton was used for contracts, employed shady staff like Sandy Berger, and many more. Using Liberal logic Bush and Clinton are the same.

It seems that this type of warrant-less searches and wiretaps have been happening for a long time. Could it be that the Clinton Administration was involved in this type of espionage? Yes, of course his administration was involved and advocated this type of warrant-less wire tapping, and I’m glad that they did. Because when all the political rhetoric goes away, the defense of America is all that matters.

National Review
"The Department of Justice believes, and the case law supports, that the president has inherent authority to conduct warrant-less physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes," Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on July 14, 1994."It is important to understand," Gorelick continued, "that the rules and methodology for criminal searches are inconsistent with the collection of foreign intelligence and would unduly frustrate the president in carrying out his foreign intelligence responsibilities."

NewsMax
“During the 1990's under President Clinton, the National Security Agency monitored millions of private phone calls placed by U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries under a super secret program code-named Echelon.”

Opinionnation
I love when facts come out and end up proving my point. I have no doubt that the majority of Americans understand the need for our Government to spy on individuals whom they believe are a threat. Do I want them exploiting this power…No, I don’t. But do I want the government to do their job…Yes, I do. Do you think we are fighting a war that requires espionage at the most secret levels? Do you think that the government's failing before 9-11 should be repeated? Do you think that paperwork is the end all be all? Do you really think your rights are being violated? My rights have never been violated. The fact is, if I visit via internet, or call a known terrorist group or support group, I expect to be flagged. If I wasn't flagged then my government and Intel agencies would be among the worst in the world. If my government was not spying on individuals that have adequate ties to terrorism, be they foreign or American, I would be scared shitless.

Valerie Plame In Pajamas

Joe, I'm Sorry. I Didn't Plan This...But, He Is The Former President


Above is the headline I sent in to the Drudge Report. I hope they use it. He asked readers to come up with a headline that fits the new pajama picture put out by Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson.

Valerie Plame and her husband Joe Wilson have posed for a new photo shoot. Call me a right-wing hawk, but if she was covert and endangered why on earth is she doing more publicity stunts. If she was truly covert and in danger, wouldn't her contacts and inside informers have all been flagged by now. If the [enemy] knows her face then they now know that her contacts are possible informers or CIA colleagues. Maybe Joe should have thought about that before writing an op-ed piece in the most recognizable news paper in the world.

What gets me upset is that Joe reported to the NY times that Saddam Hussein did not seek "yellow cake" in Africa. But he never proves it. How does he know and who told him. That would be like if he went to Iran and asked, "The United States thinks your building this nuclear program to develop a nuclear weapon, is that true?" And when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of Iran says, "no, it is for peaceful energy," Wilson goes to the NY Times and slams the Administration saying, "I was sent to Iran and I can tell you for sure that Bush is lying, Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful."

Fascism Is On The Move

The Fascism of the Democratic Party is on the move. How quickly they will turn on their own members. Honesty is really unwelcome among the ranks of the Democrats.

Joe Lieberman, the Democratic senator has been slandered by his own party for several weeks now and it’s just getting worse. I reported on how their Party was actively trying to stem the opinions of people they disagreed with. Hillary Clinton, who was shouted down by a far-left group for supporting the war in Iraq and Ann Coulter who was shouted down as she was trying to give a speech, are two recent examples. The other example was when Joseph Lieberman came back from Iraq and pointed out how much progress we have made there. He was viciously attacked by many in his party for refusing to parrot the party line of, " Iraq is a disaster and we need to surrender." He was threatened, by the far left activist group Move On.org, to fall in line or they will rally their 10,000 Connecticut members to support an opposing candidate that would do what he was told. Move On.org, the organization that claimed in 2004 that they had bought and paid for the Democratic Party, has now been joined by leading left wing Democrats in Connecticut. This comment was made by the chairman of the Fairfield Democratic Committee in Connecticut: "It's at the point where he's no longer interested in his own party's opinion, he's really out of touch with reality. For me, he's crossed the line a number of times."

Dissension is constantly squashed in the Democratic Party as seen, quite clearly, with Joseph Lieberman. Because a Democratic leader in Washington must follow orders or they will be slandered and attacked and overthrown by their professed owners. That explains why so many leading Democrats are constantly lying about Iraq, The Patriot Act and the newly disclosed spy charges. They have to lie, or else they risk being brought down by the far-left groups that own them.

The Democrats Knew

The Democrats knew about the Administration spying on suspected terrorists. Listen to Harry Reid, the democratic minority leader, trip over his tongue in this Fox News interview. Watch how he dodges questions and uses spin to avoid looking stupid. This is a great display of why the Democratic leadership is pathetic. Listen when Chris Wallace asks Harry Reid if he was briefed by the President about spying on terrorists without a warrant. This is classic. Also listen to his double speak about Iraq and about the Patriot Act.

Treason

Opinionnation
After the NY Times illegally disclosed that the NSA tracks terrorists without a warrant President Bush announced today that he indeed ordered the surveillance of individuals linked to Al Qaeda on his weekly radio address. He said all surveillance was done within the law and that it helped save American lives. "Before we intercept these communications, the government must have information that establishes a clear link to these terrorist networks," President Bush said. He also said, "The unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk.Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies, and endangers our country."

Have these idiots forgotten 9-11. They complain about Bush bringing up 9-11 all the time but for some reason they have forgotten what happened. Media like the New York Times, like I have said on many occasions, is actively aiding our enemy for the express purpose of damaging the President. The NY Times does not care about the American people nor are they endangering our country and our troops for righteous reasons. This is another sick display of treason perpetrated by the far-left and the media. We have Democrats and weak Republicans complaining about George Bush using surveillance to track individuals that have links to Al Qaeda. Are you fucking kidding me! Excuse my language but this is sickening. These techniques have been approved by congress and the Justice Department and they are designed to prevent another attack on US soil. This is not used to spy on innocent people this is used to spy on people who have been adequately linked to our enemy. I wanted to do an entry today that didn’t deal with how the Democrats and the far-left are endangering our country but this has gone too far.

There are people in this country who actual think the New York Times is not biased. There are levels of stupidity within this country that surpass comprehension. There are people who don’t want the Government to track terrorists. Can you believe what’s going on; we have tools of Al Qaeda like the NY times and the far-left actively aiding the enemy. 9-11 occurred, besides Clinton’s inaction, because the government was not allowed to track or follow suspected terrorists. Any sane American understands that what Bush ordered was justified and necessary. Disclosing this highly classified information has now dropped the New York Times down to the level of Al Jazeera. There is no longer any doubt that the far-left is severely hurting our effort to fight terrorism. And the left is now filibustering the Patriot Act as I type. Imagine if these terrorist enablers and supporters were in the White House and controlled the House and Senate. We would all be dead; either that or the left would have surrendered.

I'm Outraged!, said the outrages


The Democrats got their panties in a bunch over Mr. Bush’s interview with Brit Hume of Fox News. The president, responding to a question, said he thought Delay wasn’t guilty of the charges against him. As you might imagine leaders of the Democratic Party were OUTRAGED! The president according to them was attempting to influence the jury. They called it a reckless prejudging of the case. And now they are calling for the President to reveal who leaked Valerie Plame’s name…well, other then her own husband.

"The president of the United States said a jury does not need to assemble," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. To have someone of his stature ... prejudge a case is something I've never seen before."My question to Harry Reid is, “why, if you claim that President Bush has recklessly prejudged the case, are you and other fellow Democrats doing the same thing. Why are you calling for the resignation of Tom Delay and why in the Valerie Plame case are the Democrats prematurely convicting Karl Rove. Why are you supporting organizations who have already called for Delay to be convicted?” Why is the Democratic Party consumed by hypocrisy? Mr. Reid, can you explain that to me.

Mr. Reid, your feigned outrage is typical but give us a break. We know that the Democrats are desperate and you know that the Democrats are constantly politicizing the Tom Delay case. It's just like you and other Democrats pretending you didn’t make the WMD case against Saddam. I know a lot of idiots buy into your rhetoric but I don’t. Mr. Reid your unimpressive attempt to weasel your way out of admitting the truth isn’t going to fly here. The Democrats and the liberal media constantly attempt to persuade the country that Bush ordered torture without evidence; they always claim the Bush Administration ousted a CIA agent even though the case is still underway. Just because you guys couldn't get Karl Rove doesn't mean you have to cry all the time. The Democrats and the media, in every case against the administration, prejudge and negatively influence the jury pool. It’s just another example of the pathetic nature of the once great party.

The Call to Freedom


Heavy turnout has made this historic election a grand a beautiful day in history. The first country in the history of the Middle East to vote for a constitutionally approved parliament is Iraq. This is no joke; these are real people who were brutally oppressed who are now watching and proactively aiding in their future by voting in a society that has never known such chance. Never have the Iraqi people known the actual feeling of hope. But today, despite threats from our common enemy, they built that hope from decades of torture and genocide. They have, despite the naysayers in America, proved they can have a democracy. Recent polls have over 70% of the Iraqi people saying they want democracy. They want this progress to continue and they want a chance. Any leader in this country who is calling for the immediate withdrawal of US troops is actively working against freedom and chance for the Iraqi people. Any leader or person who can’t see the history being made in front of their eyes is a dead shadow of creativity and common sense. Any leader claiming we can’t win in Iraq is actively fighting against the forces of what’s good and just in this world. Any leader, who claims this effort was not worth it, is wrong. Every leader who said this war is a quagmire should never be taken seriously again. You all know who I’m referring to. Any person who claims they care about humanity will say this effort to free the Iraqi people is one of the most important Humanitarian causes in the history of the world. You may hate George Bush but if don’t give him credit for attempting to build a free society in Iraq you’re an ideological puppet.

The Iraqi people need jobs, they need electricity, and they need America to continue to help them. I hate to say this, but now the democrats will underplay this progress and continue to lie to the American people. They will still call for retreat and they will still claim Bush lied. They will still actively work against this war effort and the Iraqi people. But for us, who can see without being told what to believe, will recognize everything the Democrats claim is bogus political rhetoric designed to undermine the President for political gain, nothing more! I call on all clear thinking and peace loving Democrats to support this very possible effort for freedom. I call on all Democrats to admit the progress in Iraq and the Middle East has been provided by the American military and the profound policies of President Bush. Afghanistan is now free and a working society and that's thanks to George Bush and the military. The Middle East has begun to shift towards more free societies thanks to the Military and George Bush. World changing and history making events have occurred because of the policies of George Bush and our brave military, who by the way, were compared to Nazis and the forces of Stalin by some leading Democrats.

Liar! LIAR! Ahhhhhhh!



They lied and thousands died! How dare those Democrats lie to us like they did! How dare they vote to remove Saddam Hussein. They manipulated Intelligence for one reason, because they planned this war since day one. The Democrats were oil hungry! They are just pandering to big oil because that’s all they care about! Halliburton! Oil! Evil! Cheney! AHHHHHHHHHH!"

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction…” -John Edwards 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.” Hillary Clinton 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Ted Kennedy 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Nancy Pelosi


"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new.” John Kerry

As you can see the left's mantra of Bush lied really only makes sense if they admit every single person listed here lied to you. Plus the many other Democrats who made the case for war against Saddam Hussein; they lied to you too. Any person who says that Bush misled these people into war is lying to you. They will desperately try to make excuses for why Bush is the liar and not their fellow Democrats. This attempt will be a pitiful display of desperation and denial but that's expected.

Dear Dems, Thanks for Nothing

This is what I call the middle finger to the democrats. It’s like they're saying, “Hey moron, we’re building a country here.” Early voting began today in Iraq’s parliamentary elections amid desperate calls from Al Qaeda not to vote.

Despite constant calls for surrender by some in America, the historic political process is continuing in Iraq. No, there is no civil war; Iraq has been rebuilding an army; voted for a transitional government; voted for a permanent government; voted for a constitution; and are about to vote in parliamentary elections. Every historic milestone for the Iraqi people is always minimized by the left and completely hidden by papers like the New York Times. “Abu Grhaib 100 times on the front page; historic elections and progress in Iraq…never heard of it.” You will hear when the elections are over and Iraq is one huge step closer to being a free society, the Democrats slightly acknowledge how great that is. Followed by Bush is a liar, let’s pull out, Bush has no plan, I support the troops but they’re terrorists Nazis.

The plan for victory: We hear claims that there is no strategy for victory in Iraq and therefore we should surrender to the terrorists. However, when asked what should be done to win the war, they say that the Iraqi military should be trained and that we should slowly turn over the country. You might wonder, “How is that different from what the Administrations plan has been all along?” It’s not…except the Dems are pretending that it never was the plan. I have a feeling that this whole situation is starting to turn. Recently, there have been Iraqi citizens turning in terrorist leadership to the United States military. That is a huge deal given the situation. The fact is, in many cases the Iraqi people are afraid that America will leave them to die like after the first Gulf War. The Iraqis, who are afraid that the "cut-and-runners" will have their way, have to stay on the fence. They feel that if they side with the Americans and then the Americans leave them at the will of the Insurgency, that’s it, they’re dead. Maybe after these elections a certain political party will join the right side in hopes that we win this war… I doubt it though.

December 11, 1941


"Delay invites danger. Rapid and united efforts by all peoples of the world who are determined to remain free will ensure world victory for the forces of justice and righteousness over the forces of savagery and barbarism." –President Roosevelt-

Looking back on History is important to understand what made this country a great nation. On December 11, 1941 the axis powers Italy and Germany declared War on the United States of America. Hitler claimed that Roosevelt caused the outbreak of war in 1939 and was secretly planning to invade Germany. (BBC) “Both Democrats and Republicans have agreed to "adjourn politics" for the duration of the war and focus on national defense.”

What a concept! At the time both Democrats and Republican’s agreed to “adjourn politics”. God, only if the Democrats had the will to stop undermining our current war we might have the honor of calling them our leaders. Unfortunately, Politics is all I see coming from Washington. A large amount of Democrats want us to lose in Iraq. Democrats have slandered the president for political gain; comparing our troops to Nazis, to the forces of Stalin; and terrorists. Democrats have called for surrender. They have systematically lied to the American people, claiming that they were misled into war. Any person who thinks Ted Kennedy or John Kerry was misled into war is wrong. You don’t support the troops, Democrats, by assuring them they can’t win in Iraq or that they are terrorists or that they are Nazis or that they equivalent to the forces of Stalin. You don’t support the troops by a systematic effort to re-write history to gain seats in the Senate. Do you think that quote Roosevelt gave to congress should be etched in the foreheads of this current Democratic Party? I do

How Dare You Not Flip-Flop!


-It’s beginning to look a lot like Fascism-
One of the few Democrats that actually cares for his country is now being attacked for his principled stance on Iraq. The Democratic Party has turned their back on being Americans and have decided to actively undermine the war and in some cases attempt to coerce people into hating the President. In fact they “torture” people with their hypocritical rhetoric until they finally say enough! We will bow down to your fascist political party. More to the point, it seems that the Democratic Party is on the side of our terrorist enemy. There is no doubt that the honorable Joseph Lieberman has recognized this obvious betrayal and has refused to go along with his colleagues attempts to force surrender in Iraq. Lieberman, being one of the authors of the Iraq Liberation Act, fully understands what a free Iraq means to the US and to the world. The act, which for you lefties was signed into policy by Bill Clinton, called for the United States to effectively produce regime change in Iraq.

Ask yourself why the Democratic Party hates the fact that Joseph Lieberman has not followed their attempts to re-write history. According to the ultra-left New York Times, the senate minority leader called Senator Lieberman to quote “express concerns with his views.” Express concerns with what view is my question. The view that trying to free 26 million people is wrong. The view that Saddam Hussein, according to nearly ever Democrat who signed the Iraq Liberation Act and who voted for war, should be removed from power. The views he expressed as an individual with the freedom to tell the truth about the Democratic Party’s attempt to undermine this war for political gain. Those views? Express concern over Mr. Lieberman’s views…yeah right, that’s code for, you do what we say or we will use groups like MoveOn to launch a campaign against you. According to the Times, MoveOn’s head propagandist in DC has called Lieberman’s stance on the war a betrayal. He has also vowed to rally MoveOn’s 10,000 Connecticut members against the Senator if the right candidate was to enter the next election. Sounds about right, doesn’t it?

Lieberman said: "We undermine the president's credibility at our nation's peril"

Liberal means Free Speech!...but not for you

There are very few things for which I would defend Hillary Clinton, because obviously, she is a political hack. However, when it comes to free speech I support her right. That is not the same for the far-left in this country. Case in Point: Code Pink a far-left activist group, which you might think supported Hillary, began to heckle the New York senator while she was giving a speech in Chicago. The whiny liberal group interrupted Mrs. Clinton’s speech by childishly yelling, “Troops out now! Troops out now! Another example recently was when the outspoken Ann Coulter was invited to speak at the University of Connecticut. Upset activists with their infantile intellect disrupted the event by playing loud music before she had a chance to speak. Given the disruption, Ann decided to skip the speech and answer some questions from the audience. However, before she began the Q&A segment she accurately described the situation. "I love to engage in repartee with people that are a lot stupider than I am," she said. `We're having a question and answer right now with the little crybabies." Coulter also made fun of Ted Kennedy saying, "If the Democrats want to stick to the middle of the road, why did they pick Ted Kennedy. Didn't he have some trouble sticking to the middle of the road?" (Get it…Ted Kennedy drove off a bridge and accidentally killed a women)

Oh, and by the way, UConn invited another speaker to discuss current events. Remember Cindy Sheehan, the mom who lost her son in Iraq, she also spoke at the university. I wonder…did the far-left attack and disrupt her speech? Of course not. Even though her accusations against Bush are insane she was treated with respect. Hypocrisy is the link that binds the liberal agenda. Remember in the Liberal mind, Free speech is for terrorist sympathizers like Ward Churchill; not for you or me or Ann Coulter.

Will They Surrender?

Are the Democrats really the type of people that will bend to the will of the Insurgency? There has been a lot of talk lately from Democrats such as John Kerry, Howard Dean, and John Murtha of actually pulling a France and waving the white flag. Not ever in my life would I have thought this day would come. A major American political party is bowing down in the face of roadside bombs and terrorist rhetoric. As an American I am deeply offended by this call for retreat from many leading Democrats. After thinking about why it is they want to surrender to the Insurgents I came to a couple conclusions.
A) The Democratic Party is so selfish and so desperate for political power that they are truly willing to undermine the war in Iraq in hopes to gain the support of their far-left base. This has been evident for the last year with comments coming from the Democrats claiming our American soldiers are Nazis; Comparing our military to the forces of Stalin; The Democrats claiming that Bush tricked them into voting for war when they knew exactly what they were voting for; Kerry claiming that the Military in Iraq are terrorists, terrorizing women and children; Al Gore and his idiocy claiming Bush betrayed the country even though under Bill Clinton he bombed Iraq and killed innocent people on the same Intel Bush used to gain support for overthrowing Saddam. Democrats calling the military broken; Democrats refusing to admit the historic progress that Iraq has made thus far. Democrats called Afghanistan a quagmire, that’s how anxious they are to lie for political power; Democrats refusing to blame the actual terrorists causing the instability in Iraq so they can Blame America and Bush. And so on and so on…

Or B) The Democrats have really given up and want to surrender to terrorists in the middle of the war on Terrorism [Because no matter what way you put it, that’s what giving up is]. They are waving the French Flag of surrender and they seem to be doing it with honor. “Please Mr. Terrorist, you can have Iraq...you broke our will to fight you.”

Personally I think it’s A. Either way they sicken me!

The Links to Terrorism

For the Far-left in the country that do not think Hussein had links to Terrorists. Read the story at Media Research or press play to watch the video

The Far-Left and Al Qaeda vs. America

The ACLU has now decided to sue the CIA for transporting an individual to a prison in Afghanistan. They have let their Civil liberties duty be taken over by a foreign policy issue. Recently, the New York Times endangered the CIA and US personnel by reporting on secret landing patterns of CIA planes carrying suspected terrorists. The EU has been calling for an explanation to why countries like, Britain allow the CIA to refuel in the country. You can imagine what FDR would say about these treasonous actions on the part of the ACLU and New York Times. Condi Rice has assured the EU that the United States does not violate any countries sovereignty and that they do not torture.

For those people who think the ACLU does not have an anti-American, anti-military agenda this should be the last straw for you. Since when does the ACLU have the right to interfere with the CIA? Recently I wrote about why I don’t mind if the military bombed Al Jazeera because they are tools of the enemy; well, it’s the same for the ACLU. The world has hit a new low for hypocrisy, leftist propaganda, and insanity. And if you happen to be a member of this fascist organization please, reconsider. Because this organization wants us to lose in Iraq, they are against free speech, they are willing to undermine the CIA and the war to make a political statement. And they hate this country.

You will be hearing about this more in a few days. I’m sure Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity will be al over this outrages lawsuit.

Democrats Miss Saddam

41 percent of Democrats give support for Saddam Hussein’s former regime. In a new Opinion/Dynamics poll, Bush’s approval ratings began to slightly rebound but what I found most interesting is that a large number of Democrats basically want Saddam Hussein back in power.
The poll asked: “Do you think the world would be better or worse off if Saddam was still in power.”

41% of Democrats said it would be better if he was in power
34% of democrats said it would be worse if he was in power

61% of people think that Hussein either hid/moved/destroyed his weapons
11% unsure where his weapons are
28% say he did not have weapons

I’m not really surprised that so many Democrats feel genocide, mass rape, and extreme torture is better for the world than voting for constitutions, assembling a country, and the Iraqis fighting for a freer society. Not surprised at all. Remember, their disdain for Bush causes their reasonability and common sense to be overpowered; so in that way it is almost expected.

CIA Leak

Is it not hypocrisy for a newspaper to illegally reveal a covert operation and have no Democrats crying about it? The Washington Post put America in danger by selfishly revealing the fact that the CIA has prison facilities [Black Sites] stationed in certain areas inside Europe. The left has been more than eager to use this ousted secret CIA operation to try and damage the Administration. Valerie Plame was claimed to be endangered by the left, but when the military and the CIA are actually in danger they are perfectly fine with it...In fact they are so fine with this they use it as a basis for an anti-military, anti-American onslaught. I find it amazingly hypocritical that people are reveling in the outing of a secret CIA operation while at the same time loathing the Valerie Plame “leak” case. They love this leak because it hurts the administration. It definitely endangers the CIA and the people who work at these facilities as well as the American public but they don’t care. It’s obvious they don’t care. So why cry, whine and call for premature resignations for the Valerie Plame case but use this obviously worse incident as ammunition? Well, I can answer that…Because many in the Democratic Party are willing to put the safety of the military in jeopardy for short term political gains.

Recently the New York Times put the CIA and American troops in danger by leaking flight information dealing with terrorist detainees. They listed a schedule of where CIA planes in Europe and the Middle East land and what they land for. The New York Times is actively giving out information that is pertinent to the enemy; Information that can really cause damage, unlike the Valerie Plame case. I am waiting to hear the American left get upset about this leak and the Washington Post leak. If they don’t get upset then they are obviously, as I said, Hypocrites.

President Bush




As a Bush supporter I hardly think any jokes about Bush are funny or even original. But when I first saw Steve Bridges on The Roast of Jeff Foxworthy I knew this man was the greatest Bush Impersonator ever! And what’s great is that it’s actually funny.
Enjoy!

"How dare you remove a brutal dictator"


You might have heard about the four so-called peace protestors being held hostage in Iraq. It turns out that they are a Christian peace activist group who loves to stick their heads in where they don’t belong. On their own website they have this picture; claiming to be stopping the Israeli army from killing innocent Palestinians. (Yeah right). That picture alone with the caption they use simply illuminates what this group is really about. This is their mission statement: "Christian Peacemaker Teams
(CPT) offers an organized, nonviolent alternative to war and other forms of lethal inter-group conflict.” And this is what they are doing in Iraq, if you can believe it: “A Baghdad-based presence since October 2002. Team members accompanied the Iraqi people through the U.S.-led 2003 war and continue during the post-war occupation to expose abusive acts by U.S. Armed Forces and support Iraqis committed to nonviolent resistance.” Quite Radical wouldn’t you say?

It just so happens that a terrorist group kidnapped some of these idiots a few days ago and released a video to prove it. Of course the video was broadcast on Al jazeera, the neighborhood terrorist propaganda mill. Al Jazeera received the video via actual terrorist for the express purpose of using it as propaganda. [So there is nothing wrong with bombing them; they are tools of the enemy] Anyway, the Islama-facist group, calling themselves “the swords of truth” claimed these people were spies for the US and UK governments. Some leftists will probably buy into that claim and condemn the US, but that’s what they do. The actual website of the CPT has already done so. This is what they said about the situation: “We are angry because what has happened to our teammates is the result of the actions of the U.S. and U.K. governments due to the illegal attack on Iraq and the continuing occupation and oppression of its people.” WOW! The ramblings of Insanity speak volumes for the reasonable. These people are nuts.

They blamed the United States not the terrorist insurgence who kidnapped them. This is what upsets me the most. US troops and Special Forces are now risking their lives to save these people. They shouldn’t waste their time unless CPT apologizes and agrees to never spread their nonsense again. Of course that won’t happen so the US shouldn’t bother. Will the Peace-Movement ever learn?