For Those Who Still Deny Hussein had Connections to Terrorists

For the Far-left in the country that do not think Hussein had links to Terrorists. Read the story at Media Research or watch the video



From My Original Entry: Hussein's Terrorist Training Camps

It turns out that indeed,
according to newly discovered records, Saddam Hussein trained thousands of terrorists in the years prior to the US led invasion. It’s well known that Iraq had links to individual terrorists but what was never figured by most people, is that Hussein actually trained a substantial number of Islamic Extremists. This, if true, and it looks as if it is, changes the entire political debate. The Administration’s contention that Iraq had substantial ties to terrorism has been in dispute since the beginning of the war. This revelation will end the debate about Hussein and the claim of his secular beliefs preventing him from engaging in Islama-fascist undertakings.

Bill Clinton Wants Hamas to be Respected

Bill Clinton is urging the United States to cozy up with the terrorist organization Hamas by establishing a dialogue and not to break off contact simply because they kill people in a way we don’t like. Hamas, the terrorist group that specifically targets innocent people to murder, is being praised by our former president. I was waiting for the Europeans to break first and show their terrorist-sympathizer-tendencies but it seems Bill got it done saying at a World Economic Forum, Hamas might "acquire a greater sense of responsibility, and as they do we have to be willing to act on that." He went on to say, “One of the politically correct things in American politics ... is we just don't talk to some people that we don't like, particularly if they ever killed anybody in a way that we hate.”
-Quotes from
NewsMax and the AP-

I see Bill never learns. After Bill Clinton appeased terrorism throughout his entire administration it led to not only a dozen attacks on the US including the USS Cole but in large part to 9-11. Clinton’s horrid inaction, not only allowed Al Qaeda to flourish but it gave them incentive to attack the United States. The refusal by the Clinton administration to be given Osama Bin Laden comes to mind. As does the fear they had of collateral damage as displayed when Osama was targeted by Intel but got away because Clinton was mired in scandal and could not afford any more bad press. Not to mention the memo the left likes to bring up: “Bin Laden determined to attack in US”. That memo was, of course, ignored by the Clinton administration for a long time and then passed on to the Bush administration.

I don’t know what exactly Bill is trying to do. For the most part, Bill only cares about his self-perceived legacy and perhaps he is trying to solidify his attempts at Mid East peace during the 90’s, who knows. All I know is that Hamas targets innocent people to kill and has one overall goal which is to destroy Israel and kill every Jew in the Middle East. I guess Bill Clinton thinks it is perfectly fine to be a terrorist organization if that organization is in control of a state.

Kennedy Goes Crazy on the Senate Floor

This is why I love Democrats…they are nuts!

Ted Kennedy, after trying to smear Samuel Alito by falsely painting him as a racists and a bigot, tries to re-mount his self-righteous high horse. Hilarious! What a liar and a partisan hack.


WMP version via Expose the Left

Al Zawahri calls Bush a 'Butcher' in a new tape


Al-Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahri said in a videotape aired Monday that President Bush was a "butcher" and a "failure" because of a deadly U.S. airstrike in Pakistan targeting the bin Laden deputy.
Al-Zawahri, shown in the video wearing white robes and a white turban, said a Jan. 13 airstrike in the eastern village of Damadola killed "innocents," and he said the United States had ignored an offer from al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden for a truce.
"Butcher of Washington, you are not only defeated and a liar, but also a failure. You are a curse on your own nation," he said, referring to Bush. "Bush, do you know where I am? I am among the Muslim masses." Click on the USA Today link to read the full story

Opinionnation Times
So now we are seeing AL Qaeda’s new propaganda strategy…use the talking points of the Democratic Party. This is very interesting to see happening. The question is, will the Dems fall in line and start using Al Zawahri as their new Michael Moore. I have a feeling that this new trend of Al Qaeda following the Democrats lead in denouncing the removal of Saddam Hussein, denouncing the killing of 4 top Al Qaeda members in Pakistan, and calling the war on terror a failure will get some traction among the far-left. My question is, if Bush is such a failure why is Afghanistan freer and why is it that the Taliban were obliterated. The other question is, why if Bush is a failure is Al-Zawahri hiding like a chicken. And if he is so interested in Martyrdom then why is it that he is running and hiding using video tapes to say something. I don’t see Osama or Al-Zawahri strapping a suicide belt around their waist looking for the “infidels” to blow up. You know what this new video reminds me of; it reminds me of “Baghdad Bob” announcing, while US tanks are in the background, that America has failed to defeat the Iraqi Army. They[Al Qaeda] are losing and they are desperate to break the will of the American people. That is the only way they can win. If they get the left to surrender, which is what they are trying to do by releasing such tapes, they can claim victory.

As for the Pakistan air strike; I am sure some Bush-haters will blame America for placing terrorists inside this village and then placing innocent people all around 4 top Al Qaeda officials. As we have come to see the far-left thinks we are responsible for this village harboring terrorists and therefore we are to blame. Do I feel bad because innocent people died in this strike…actually no, not really. Do I feel bad that the left is blaming America and not the people who actually were harboring terrorists…yes I do. Those who willingly put innocent people at risk by aiding terrorists are to blame for the collateral damage, not America.

Iraqi General Comes Clean on WMD

Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction were moved to Syria before the invasion. According to an Iraqi General, Saddam Hussein knew America was going to invade and had his weapons transported to Syria. General Georges Sada, a man you might not have heard of yet, because the left-wing media refuses to report on or give Mr. Sada a forum to speak, has knowledge of what happened to the WMD. The New York Sun had an exclusive interview with General Sada who has just released a book, “Saddam’s Secrets”. It is the General's contention that Saddam transported his WMD via airplane to Syria before the invasion. He has said that two Iraqi Boeing planes were converted into cargo planes. It took 56 trips, on these formerly civilian airliners, which were disguised as an Iraqi aid package, for the weapons to be completely smuggled to Syria. “There are weapons of mass destruction gone out from Iraq to Syria, and they must be found and returned to safe hands. I am confident they were taken over,” General Sada Claims. This also fits in with an underreported fact that Israel has been adamant that Iraq moved its weapons to Syria before the invasion. As a person who has read, “Saddam’s Bomb maker”, written by the former head of Hussein’s WMD program, and who is now reading “Saddam’s Secrets”, I have to tell you that I have almost no doubt that Hussein moved his WMD.

Can it be that Saddam did like most people suspected he had done two years ago and hid his weapons? Saddam Hussein killed thousands of people using Chemical weapons and his goal was to ultimately acquire Nuclear Weapons. According to every Iraqi official and Iraqi documentation that I have read, Saddam Hussein wished to lift sanctions with the help of France and Russia and then reconstitute his nuclear program. There is no doubt that Hussein had chemical weapons and most likely biological weapons. To me, I don't really care if he did or did not have WMD. I would have supported Clinton if he decided to enforce his regime change policy and take out that genocidal tyrant. With or without WMD; removing Saddam Hussein was the right thing to do.

Here is an official UN report that the mainstream media also refused to report for the public:
UNITED NATIONS(AP) - U.N. satellite imagery experts have determined that material that could be used to make biological or chemical weapons and banned long-range missiles has been removed from 109 sites in Iraq, U.N. weapons inspectors said in a report obtained Thursday.
In the report to the U.N. Security Council, acting chief weapons inspector Demetrius Perricos said he's reached no conclusions about who removed the items or where they went. He said it could have been moved elsewhere in Iraq, sold as scrap, melted down or purchased. He said the missing material could be used for legitimate purposes. "However, they can also be utilized for prohibited purposes if in a good state of repair." Perricos said analysts found, for example, that 53 of the 98 vessels that could be used for a wide range of chemical reactions had disappeared. "Due to its characteristics, this equipment can be used for the production of both commercial chemicals and chemical warfare agents," he said. The report said 37 of 405 fermenters ranging in size from 2 gallons to 1,250 gallons had been removed. Those could be used to produce pharmaceuticals and vaccines as well as biological warfare agents such as anthrax. The largest percentages of missing items were at the 58 missile facilities, which include some of the key production sites for both solid and liquid propellant missiles, the report said.

Polls Show Hillary Would Lose in '08

New polls indicate that Hillary Clinton would have little to no chance to win a presidential bid in 2008. According to a CNN/Gallup poll released Thursday, only 16% of those polled said they would vote for Hillary for president while 51% of people said they would definitely NOT vote for Mrs. Clinton. The New York Post has also indicated that 43% of women do not want to see the former first lady as president. Hillary’s feeble attempt to move to the center on key political issues seems to have failed in the minds of most people. That failure leads me to this point: One of the many mistakes the Democrats made in 2004 was that they nominated an extreme liberal that was viewed as being weak on terror. They thought that since John Kerry served in Vietnam it would create a sense of a pro-military and strong-on-terror message. That of course failed because most people knew that John Kerry was beholden to the UN and their corrupt organization. Hillary Clinton is also an extreme liberal that has attacked the President for taking necessary steps to protect America; Namely the Patriot Act and the NSA terrorist surveillance program. She has done this while supporting the President’s decision to remove Saddam Hussein.

Hillary Clinton has a tight rope to walk and people, especially democratic strategists, are seeing John Kerry all over again. What Kerry did during the ’04 campaign is that he tried to satisfy the far-left by pretending he was against the war in Iraq and he tried to satisfy moderates by pretending he was strongly in favor of the war. This is where Kerry lost the election; do you remember the famous quote, “I voted for the 87 billion dollars; before I voted against it.” Well, what the America people rightly recognized is that John Kerry had no legitimate stance on any important issue; and this is true for one simple reason. He was afraid to alienate his far-left base. Hillary is in a similar situation in that she also has to set aside her true beliefs and engage in a pandering campaign. Like I have pointed out, the far-left is outraged at Hillary’s support of the war in Iraq. But Hillary in her heart, despite what she says, supports the war 100%. So, what she has been forced to do is to use double-speak to get across a message of “I support this war but I don’t support this war.” Like in 2004, this political positioning has been poorly executed. Example: The NSA spy program is supported by the majority of the American people. Most Americans according to an Opinion Dynamics poll say they are willing to sacrifice some freedoms in order to protect the country. Most people don’t mind the NSA using warrant-less surveillance to track suspected threats; they understand. However, once again, the Democrats have misjudged the American people. They have launched an attack on the President by claiming he has broken that law in terms of the NSA program and is power hungry. This is a huge miscalculation on their part and will likely backfire resulting in another major election loss.

What the Democrats have to do, in order to win in 2008, is elect an honest democrat such as Joseph Lieberman. Nominating Hillary would be great for the Republican Party as polls and conventional wisdom show. If they decide to, once again, bow down to the far-left and nominate an extreme liberal, they will lose. The American people will reject Hillary Clinton because, like John Kerry, she molds her positions on political calculation; not on what she truly believes
.

Obstructionism: Dems to Filibuster Alito

Do the Democrats ever learn? John Kerry has now vowed to support a filibuster against the well-qualified and outstanding judge, Samuel Alito. John Kerry is among the most liberal Senators that are in power today and his partisanship has been well documented. In this case he has refused to do his duty as a United States senator by obstructing the nomination process of Mr. Samuel Alito. Ted Kennedy has also agreed to support a filibuster but that was never in any doubt. Now, as I predicted in several entries, the Democratic Party has been forced into obstructing this historic process using lies and by threatening a filibuster. There is no doubt that this move to block a well-qualified Judge was preplanned and is now being executed for the express purpose of satisfying the owners of the Democratic Party. Once again our Democratic friends have bowed down to the wishes of the far-left and indeed have been “bribed” to dishonor the senate more than they already have.

What amazes me is that liberals in America are accepting of this outrages act of partisan hackery. They are accepting because they view this weak threat as something they can slam George Bush with. It is like history is repeating itself. In 2004 the Democrats lied and misled the entire nation to try and overthrow the legitimate President of the United States. We saw the Democrats embrace Hollywood propaganda. We saw the Democrats embrace terrorism by denouncing George Bush and the necessary tactics his administration uses to protect the American People. A quick Review of the deplorable acts of the Democrats: Gave terrorists CIA plane routes and the location of secret prisons. They lied about their support for the war in Iraq. They called Afghanistan a quagmire. Dems compared the US military and their tactics to the forces of Hitler and Stalin. John Kerry claimed our Brave US service people were “terrorizing” Iraqi women and children. An LA Times writer says he doesn’t support the troops. Democrats blamed a hurricane on George Bush. The far-left attacked their own senators for not following orders. They slandered an honorable judge with hypocritical charges of racism and bigotry. They lie and undermine our war on terror while pretending they are righteous and good. And they wonder why they are labeled by some as being “anti-American.” To me they are not anti-American; their desperation for power and their hatred for President Bush has led the Democratic Party to undermine the country and our safety for short-term political gain. What they are too blind to see is that their terrible negligence usually backfires and they hurt their own chances of election. If they weren’t endangering our country and corrupting our system of government, I might be content with allowing them to shoot themselves in the foot.

Air America is Tanking

So, Air America has now gone from an over hyped propaganda radio station to an enterprise that actually has to pay for its smear to be heard. As reported by the O’Reilly Factor, Air America has been losing so much money and is such a failure that instead of radio stations paying them to be on the air, which is normal, Air America has to bribe stations to let them stay on the air. They have also stolen money from a boys and girls charity and refused for over a year to give it back. With ratings very low and still dipping fast Air America is only on the air because of far-left billionaires funneling money into their bank account. Given that Air America is simply a left-wing propaganda outfit it makes sense for it to be a failure and it also makes sense that liberal contributors are desperate to keep it going despite losing a ton of money. Personally I think Al Franken’s show is hilarious. I almost die laughing every time Al pretends to understand politics…very funny!

Also on the Liberal activist front is the New York Times Editorial.
The Times is now calling for the Democratic Party to filibuster the nomination of Samuel Alito. The New York Times…well you know what the NY Times represents. I’m not sure about the filibuster but the majority of the Democratic Party will likely vote No on judge Alito proving once again how partisan they are. I knew that the Democrats would vote No on Alito because that’s what they do; they lie for political gain. There is absolutely no reason why any Democrat should vote no on Judge Altio, but they will. As I explained in past entries, they decided to vote no on any candidate President Bush nominated, despite qualifications.

Liberals Attack the Truth

Recently a Washington Post website had to be taken down because the far-left sent vulgar and obscene comments to Deborah Howell an ombudsman for Washington Post.com. The hate-filled left got upset at Deborah for accurately pointing out that Jack Abramoff and his firms gave money to both Republicans and Democrats. Here are three comments that were printable as posted by Washington Post.com

"Yes, the WAPO needs an enema, and Howell should be the first thing that gets medicinally removed."

"You Deborah Howell, stop lying about Democrats getting money from Abramoff. Democrats do not control anything in Washington, so why would he waste money bribing them. Think and do your research, and stop being an idiot."

"This rag must be something that I pulled off a barscreen at a sewage treatment plant. Howell is simply a paid liar. How this creature endures itself is something I don't understand. What a piece of flotsam."

Yes ladies and gentlemen these are the future morons liberals of America; the Daily Show crowd in its entire splendor. Well, as we have come to realize that the left in this country utterly loath the first amendment and accuracy in the media, we have seen them take out their frustration on anyone who doesn’t say what they want to hear. In an earlier post I pointed out that there is an entire website that was designed to send hate-mail to Chris Matthews because he accurately compared the new talking points of Osama Bin Laden to the insanity of Michael Moore.
This has become a common occurrence with the far-left. They attacked and threatened Joseph Lieberman for supporting the effort in Iraq. They attacked Nancy Pelosi for saying she wants to win this upcoming election fight by electoral vote. Hillary Clinton has been threatened by the far-left numerous times for her support of the war in Iraq. Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton are liberals and yet if they take one position the far-left does not like; the left acts like wild chimpanzees eating their own feces. (For those who don’t get that analogy: Clinton is the feces and the far-left are the chimps).

Iraqi Woman Passionately Thanks President Bush

An Iraqi Woman has a message for the American people and those questioning the removal of Saddam Hussein: It was very emotional and inspiring.


WMP Version via Politcal Teen

Iraqi Woman: Mr. President, I would like to share this thought with all the nation and everybody who is questioning what happened to the chemical weapons. Saddam burned 4,500 villages. I lost more than 10 members of my family on the ground. We found their bones after when you freed Iraq. Saddam himself and his people, his followers, they have chemical weapons. Please stop questioning the administration and their decision. It was the best decision anybody could make. Freeing 27 million people!

Dems Vote No on Alito

It seems that the Judiciary Committee's recommendation of Sam Alito is going to be split down party lines. As predicted Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, and Ted Kennedy all gave in to partisanship and will vote no on Samuel Alito. It is not surprising that the Democrats would play politics with the nomination process because, as you know, they have been playing politics in the war on terror for over a year now.

Like I mentioned in previous posts the owners of the Democratic Party have pressured senators like Chuck Schumer into lying about Sam Aito. Schumer and the rest of the Democrats sitting on the Judiciary Committee have tried to slander Alito by claiming he is a racist and by claiming he is out of the mainstream (extremist). Now is the time to remind people that during the nomination of Justice Ginsberg, the Committee unanimously supported her, despite her being a left-wing ideologue. Back then, before the democrats were infected with the Extreme Liberalism virus, the Republican party voted for Ginsburg on her merits and qualifications; not ideology. Unlike today, where we have partisan Democrats falling in line with far-left pressure groups and or voting no specifically because of ideology. Chuck Schumer said right after the 2004 presidential election, that he would make his Supreme Court vote on ideology, not on qualifications.

Overall, the Democrats have created a “culture of corruption” in the senate. You see, they are corrupt in that they will purposely endanger and hurt the country for political gain. They lie about the run up to the war in Iraq for political gain; they slander an honorable judge for political gain; they embrace Intel leaks that truly endanger the CIA and the military but condemn leaks that are 1/100 as important. The problem the Democrats have is that their money comes from extremists that threaten them if they do not follow orders. Sure, this makes the far-left anti-free expression crowd happy but it hurts the country because the far-left is crazy.

Bush-Hating 201: The Liberal Disease

Opinionnation Times:
The Despondent nature of their uncontrollable urge to hate Bush is their catalyst. They must all say the same thing or else they shrivel up and drift away on the winds of reason and rational thought. We know that if the left were forced to look at facts and reason they would implode and stream out to form a puddle of self-loathing. That is why they must congregate and that is why they are content with being wrong.

So where did this uncontrollable urge to hate the president come from? I like to think of Liberalism as a disease that, in an almost animalistic way, rips apart the common sense of an individual and then proceeds to release neurotoxins to prevent any rational thought from penetrating the opinions of the individual. Most of us have immunity to the disease but at times it spawns to form a new strain of virus that seems to be transmitted via the media. The latest strain was spawned after the 2000 presidential election where the Supreme Court ruled George W. Bush won Florida’s electoral votes. The decision was made before every recount confirmed that Bush had indeed won Florida.

From that day forward, the “W” strain of the extreme liberalism virus has infected the moderate more immune liberal, and has created what we now see today. Their hate-filled rancor has spewed from their collective group-think creating a cesspool of intolerance and disillusionment. This misguided hatred of a single man has led many of these people to turn their backs on their country. They desperately want the US to lose the war in Iraq because as I pointed out in Bush-Blaming 101, “If we win in Iraq the Dems view it as a Bush victory not an American victory. That means that they view a loss in Iraq as a Bush loss not an American loss.” These people blame America for creating terrorism and they use America and George Bush as an excuse for Al Qaeda killing innocent people. Just think back; how many times have liberals directly blamed Al Qaeda and other terrorists for purposely killing tens of thousands of innocent people in Iraq. They blame America for that saying, “we brought it to Iraq.” That is how devastating this disease is. They refuse to blame the real enemies of Islam [Al Qaeda] and immediately blame America and George Bush. Remember, If we win in Iraq the Dems view it as a Bush victory not an American victory. That means that they view a loss in Iraq as a Bush loss not an American loss.

Al Libbi Confession Led to Pakistani Air strike

Never let them tell you coercive interrogation does not work


"Al-Libbi, a Libyan, had confessed to Pakistani interrogators after his capture in May 2005 he met al-Zawahri at Damadola, near the Afghan border, earlier in the year. Al-Libbi was captured after a shootout in another remote hamlet in northwestern Pakistan.

U.S. and Pakistani intelligence — with the aid of local tribesmen and Afghans — began monitoring the home after al-Libbi’s confession, the officials said. Pakistani authorities suspect al-Qaida operatives had gathered last week at Damadola to plan attacks early this year in Afghanistan and Pakistan..." --press the AP link above for full story--

Opinionnation Times
This attack killed high ranking Al Qaeda members including their top bomb maker and Chemist. Al-Libbi is now in American custody and I’m sure he has garnered the sympathy of the ACLU and other far-left organizations. Note to the ACLU: Stop undermining the war and stop sympathizing with AL Qaeda

The Typical Argument

The typical liberal in his infinite wisdom brought to you in the form of an Opinionnation free-write.

The Quagmire that is the quagmire is controlled by Halliburton because oil is king to them and the war is for oil. Impeach Bush for enforcing Clinton’s regime change policy because he caused a Hurricane on the gulf coast because black people were there and we know how Democrats love black people. I thought spying never happened under the NSA…I really thought it was No Such Agency. The economy or Economy or whatever is bad. Not good economy just bad. Bush is to blame for bad economy because we said so even though all the latest economic numbers proves us Democrats wrong, we still say it because people believe us. We like Mexicans but Republicans don’t, they hate Mexicans and Indians and Pakistanis and they hate Jews.


We liberals like drinking wine coolers while pretending we care because it makes us feel better. We don’t play politics with war we love war but hate this war and love the troops even though they are Nazis and terrorists but we can all support the troops but not the war, right? Bush betrayed his country by going to war and the Democrats who voted for war were in a Harry Potter spell that turned Kennedy into a frog and the rest of us into mindless sheep. Iraq is a Civil war because Sean Penn went down to Iraq and let the world know the truth. Bush lied, thousands died and stuff… Saddam was a great leader…we liberals remember how beautiful and peaceful Iraq was before the war because Michael Moore said it was peaceful. We love America; the land that is to blame for everything including genocide in Africa, global warming, death and destruction, hurricanes, and aids…but we all love America. Evil Republicans. Boo, hoo, hoo.

Liberals whine over Matthew's Comment

In reference to Bin Laden's new audiotape: Chris Matthews said that Osama’s new talking points sound like an over the top Michael Moore.

This is true; I’m not making it up. The far-left internet folk, who I like to call “pathetic clowns” are upset that Chris Matthews exercised his first amendment right by making an accurate comparison of Osama Bin Laden’s new quotes to the talking points of Michael Moore. They have actually set up a blog site to simply send Chris Matthews their hate mail. It is beyond pathetic. Do you want to know why they [liberals] do this. I'll explain: The Despondent nature of their uncontrollable urge to hate Bush is their catalyst. They must all say the same thing or else they shrivel up and drift away on the winds of reason and rational thought. We know that if the left were forced to look at facts and reason they would implode and stream out to form a puddle of self-loathing. That is why they must congregate and that is why they are content with being wrong.


I was reading some of the comments posted and a lot of them actually want MSNBC to fire Chris Matthews. It’s another example of how the far-left in this country are hypocrites. They self-righteously claim they are for free speech but when someone says something they don’t like, they desperately try and stop that speech. Imagine if college liberals, the same that heckle Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, had a place to congregate…that place would be known as the internet. They are so pathetic that thousands of these things[liberals] visit the same far-left website and all say the same thing in the comment sections. It’s as if that is the only place they are taken serious, oh wait, it is. Poor Liberals…what a sad display of desperate hatred and group-think. Here is the Website: Whiny Liberal.

Media Bias: CNN Implies Bush put out Bin Laden Tape

This is what the Left wing media does. And this is why they fall into the category of left wing media. Carefully consider the beginning of this segment where CNN’s Jack Cafferty implies Bush planned the release of this Bin Laden tape. Then notice how many left wing BS viewer comments they put up and read… Just another example of the bias. “…Is it possible Bin Laden is working out of the white house.” That’s an actual comment they read. They weed out common sense and jump right into the loony-bin file.

WMP version

Osama Bin Laden/Howard Dean in '08

Excerpts of New Bin Laden Tape: Bin Laden embraces the Democrat's talking points.
"There is no problem in this solution, but it will prevent hundreds of billions from going to influential people and warlords in America - those who supported Bush's electoral campaign - and from this, we can understand Bush and his gang's insistence on continuing the war."

"if you are sincere in your desire for peace and security, we have answered you. And if Bush decides to carry on with his lies and oppression, then it would be useful for you to read the book 'The Rogue State.'"

"But I plan to speak about the repeated errors your President Bush has committed in comments on the results of your polls that show an overwhelming majority of you want the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. But he (Bush) has opposed this wish and said that withdrawing troops sends the wrong message to opponents…”


"My message to you is about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how to end them. I did not intend to speak to you about this because this issue has already been decided. Only metal breaks metal, and our situation, thank God, is only getting better and better, while your situation is the opposite of that."

The above talking points sound very familiar... The left in this country is, and will continue, providing Al Qaeda comfort in knowing that one political party in America is weak and willing to be defeated. I said recently, “They[Al Qaeda] do this because they understand anti-war activists and anti-American media around the world will predictably blame the U.S. for forcing Islamic extremists to kill innocent people. The far-left in America is in fact, a tool that Al Qaeda uses to wage a propaganda war in hopes that they can break the will of the American people.” Now, of course this is true despite the lefts inability or refusal to recognize it. The Proof is there for everyone to see. Just a Reminder: AL Qaeda called US troop cuts a victory

Osama Calls for Truce...While Dems call for Surrender

-France announces it is willing to use nuclear weapons against any terrorist state.
-Osama is calling for a truce in Iraq and Afghanistan
-Europe isn't taking any shit from Iran.

George Bush…you are good!

Detailed commentary to come on how the Bush strategy is working, but first. So, Democrats are calling for immediate withdrawal [surrender] and Osama Bin Laden is calling for a truce in Iraq and Afghanistan. I have to say, I really don’t blame Osama for calling for a truce. Terrorists in Afghanistan are being annihilated and there are huge divisions in Iraq between Al Qaeda and Saddam loyalists. Afghanistan is free and Iraq is fighting for its freedom. There has been some backlash against Al Qaeda's targeting of innocent Muslims to kill and that anti-Al Qaeda sentiment seems to be growing. The strategy is working and you are blind if you can’t see it.

Our homeland has not been attacked yet. Our economy is stable. The Presidents will is strong and our military has done and is doing a great job! Keep up the Great work!

The Daily Show on Democrats

Even the left-wing Daily Show is getting the picture. When Nancy Pelosi gets attacked by the far-left for calling for the Democrats to solve their lack of power by electoral means, you know we live in a crazy political time.
-John Stewart on the Dems: So the democratic platform appears to be:
Democrats are our government's slaves.
New Orleans can’t be rebuilt without Willy Wonka.
And voting is for pussies
.-

I almost died laughing…This Is Great!

Watch the Video Here

Breaking News: Pakistani Air Strike Proves Vital

I have been reporting on the previously "controversial" Predator Drone bombing of a Pakistani Village that was meant to take out Al Qaeda's #2 man. I reported consistantly and accurately in support of the attack and I'm glad I did.

ABC has now learned that top Al Qaeda leaders were taken out in that village missile attack. "ABC News has learned that al Qaeda's master bomb maker and chemical weapons expert was one of the men killed in last week's U.S. missile attack in eastern Pakistan. Midhat Mursi, 52, also known as Abu Khabab al-Masri, was identified by Pakistani authorities as one of three known al Qaeda leaders present at an apparent terror summit conference in the village of Damadola." ABC Report

You might recognize the name al-Masri. He was, emphasis on WAS, Al Qaeda’s top bomb maker and chemical expert. He undoubtedly aided in the deaths of many innocent people. Ayman al-Zawahiri was supposed to be there as well but apparently changed his mind

ACLU Ad Exploits Martin Luther King, Jr

The ACLU, like AL Gore and Ray Nagin, has used the Honorable Martin Luther King’s name to attack the President of the United States. Although, I know that most of us expected the shameless far-left to stoop to this level of propaganda and hatred, it still should be pointed out. The ACLU ran this ad to the right trying, like Al Gore, to compare the intercepting of suspected terrorist communications with the wiretapping of Dr. King in the 60’s. Of course, like Al Gore, the ACLU refused to mention under what administration the wiretapping of Dr. King took place. Maybe a 2002 Atlantic Monthly article can help these pariahs of loathsome demagoguery. Atlantic Monthly: “On October 10, 1963, U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy committed what is widely viewed as one of the most ignominious acts in modern American history: he authorized the Federal Bureau of Investigation to begin wiretapping the telephones of the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.”
Well, now that we have exposed these people once again I hope their lies will cease and they will apologize for undermining America’s effort to combat global terrorism…Yeah right!

In a previous entry of mine I quoted some of today’s black leaders and how they virtually piss on the words of Dr. King. I left out one, even more dubious claim. The claim from New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin, Who blamed President Bush for the Hurricanes that hit New Orleans. He said” Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it’s destroyed and put stress on this country…Surely he doesn’t approve of us being in Iraq under false pretenses.” This level of vitriol is shocking. Does anyone on the left recognize this treason or is it; “as long as they bash Bush they can say whatever they want, no matter how crazy it is.”


What say the left? You say they don't undermine the war; you support their lies; you dismiss their hatred; you use their propaganda; You don't condemn terrorism first you condemn America; I bet you can't even bring yourself to condemn this ACLU ad.

Opinionnation Follw Up

Last week I was one of the only, if not the only, blogger to report on Donny Deutsch calling O’Reilly a thug. The Political Teen picked up on the story and provided the video of the incident. I wrote, "He attacked Bill O'Reilly because Deutsch said that Cindy Sheehan has the right to say whatever she wants...What was typical, is that he attacked Bill O’Reilly for calling for the boycotts of stores...He calls for free speech then attacks those who speak freely for something he doesn’t like." Enjoy the Video:

Video

Here is the Political Teen article: Donny Deutsch calls O'Reilly a Terrorist

Here was my Report:
Donny Deutsch calls O'Reilly a Thug

Pre-Judging the Pakistan Air strike

Pakistan has confirmed that at least four terrorists were killed in the formerly proclaimed “botched” CIA strike of a Pakistani village. Sources have also stated that Al Zarwahri, along with 12 other top terrorists were invited to the strike location but did not show. USA Today reports: “Two Pakistani intelligence officials said Ayman al-Zawahri, Osama bin Laden's top lieutenant, had been invited to a dinner in the village to mark the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha but passed it up and sent some aides instead.”

It was reported that 14 people were killed in the Predator Drone attack but only 13 bodies were seen to be buried. It is not yet known if Al Zawahri is alive or dead but the silence of Al Qaeda’s propaganda websites, speaks volumes. As for the innocent casualties, I’m not so sure that they weren’t strategically placed by the same terrorists that they welcome and hide amongst their village. Saddam Hussein used this tactic before the bombing strikes in Iraq; He forced women and children to stay in areas that were likely to be targets of Coalition precision air strikes. Of course this tactic worked and the world predictably blamed the United States for targeting innocent civilians. That’s not to say mistakes were not made in target packaging in Iraq or Pakistan but this is a war. One thing is for sure and that is our enemies are hiding and running and their primary method of resistance has been to purposely kill innocent people. They do this because they understand anti-war activists and anti-American media around the world will predictably blame the U.S. for forcing Islamic extremists to kill innocent people. The far-left in America is in fact, a tool that Al Qaeda uses to wage a propaganda war in hopes that they can break the will of the American people.

Al Gore Attacks President Bush

I know that no one takes Al Gore seriously anymore but he gave a speech today that passed outrages and bordered insane. The partisan hack Al Gore calls for us to put aside partisan differences.

Al Gore used a Martin Luther King reference to attack the President saying, “It is important to recall that for the last years of his life doctor king was illegally wiretapped…
Whose private conversations were intercepted by the US government in that period…the government tried to destroy his marriage and take him off his pedestal.”

[ What Gore left out was that It was a Democratic administration that was, in his words, “illegally wiretapping” Doctor King. He also described what the Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Ted Kennedy, and Dick Durbin did to an honorable judge by the name of Samual Alito. They slandered him; trying to take him off his “pedestal”. ]

Al Gore went on to say, “It is imperative that the rule of law be restored to our country. A president who breaks the law; is a threat to the very structure of our government."

[ Again, someone needs to inform Al Gore that lying under oath to a grand jury, is breaking the law. So Al Gore called his former boss, Bill Clinton, a threat to the very structure of our government ]

Al Gore: “At present we still have much to learn about the NSA domestic surveillance. What we do know…virtually compels the conclusion that the President has been breaking the law.”

[ So Al, You don’t know much about the situation and you have already concluded that President Bush broke the law. Someone Needs to remind Al that his own administration's attorney general argued the rights of the executive to use warrant-less wiretaps. ]

Gore also went on to insinuate that we live under a tyranny too reminiscent to British Kings
He also compared Iraq to Vietnam. He called the war in Iraq (removal of Saddam Hussein) a colossal mistake.

The C-Span video of Speech

Current Black Leaders Undercut Dr. King

"But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred...We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline...This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day...I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers..."

I Wish African-American so called “leaders” would heed Dr. King’s words. Unfortunately, today’s “leaders” have drunk from the cup of bitterness and hatred. How dare these hypocrites speak of the great Martin Luther King today.

Exploiting Racial Tensions for Political Gain
-Louis Farrakhan claimed that the levee system in New Orleans was blown up. He claimed that it was blown up in order to kill off the black population of New Orleans. The hero to the left and to a radical group of black Muslims made this claim in North Carolina saying, "I heard from a very reliable source who saw a 25 foot deep crater under the levee breach," Farrakhan explained. ”It may have been blown up to destroy the black part of town and keep the white part dry."

-Harry Belefonte said at Duke University: (Yes, Duke Actually invited the madman to speak) "Dr. King lives. His spirit lives." He said this just days after he called President Bush the biggest tyrant and terrorist in the world.

-Howard Dean struck again the other day. He attacked Ken Mehlman the head of the GOP for planning to give a speech in front of the NAACP.Dean said crazily, "I'm shocked that he would have the nerve to show his face in front of any African American organization after the way they treated those people in New Orleans." (As if Democrats own black people)

-Jesse Jackson. The racist Jesse Jackson has now Insinuated that George Bush is a racist. That he purposely failed in aid for Hurricane Katrina because he hates blacks.

Washington Times- Black Democrats Throw Oreos at Conservative Republican
Black Democratic leaders in Maryland say that racially tinged attacks against Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele in his bid for the U.S. Senate are fair because he is a conservative Republican.
Such attacks against the first black man to win a statewide election in Maryland include pelting him with Oreo cookies during a campaign appearance, calling him an "Uncle Tom" and depicting him as a black-faced minstrel on a liberal Web blog.

George Galloway Pretends to be a Cat



George Galloway: Anti-War British MP Pretends to Be A Cat on Reality TV


I was going to do a story about this a couple of days ago but there was no video available for me to use. Now there is…enjoy.If you can't see it above, click here

I have had very heated debates with anti-war nuts about the anti-American and anti-Semitic George Galloway. I argued his guilt before it was actually announced that he indeed stole money from the Oil for Food Program. The UN confirmed his lies as did the US Senate. Many Europeans defended George Galloway because he was spewing anti-American propaganda. That of course is all the leftist mentality needs to be convinced.

George Galloway:
-He illegally profited from the Oil for Food Scandal.
-He lied under oath during a senate hearing.

Galloway was a hero to the anti-war movement saying:
"Therefore it can be said that the Iraqi resistance is not just defending Iraq. They are defending all the Arabs and they are defending all the people of the world from American hegemony."

He also denounced those Iraqis who had joined the security forces as "collaborators" and said it was "normal" for them to be targets for suicide bombers - who have killed hundreds of them.

“Actually, the Iraqi resistance does not target its own civilians. But the people that are being fought by the resistance in Iraq are the people that are working for the occupation.”

Pakistan Shamelessly Protests the U.S.

Recently the CIA had intelligence that they thought identified Al Qaeda’s number two, Ayman al Zawahiri. It turned out to be bad Intel and regrettably the CIA’s predator drone killed some innocent civilians. Pakistani tribesmen, who support and conceal Osama Bin Laden, have claimed that no terrorists were among the dead. I don’t necessarily believe that to be true. Due to the accidental deaths of innocent Pakistanis [Muslim] huge protest are now breaking out condemning the United States. Nationwide protests against the US have occurred including 10,000 people chanting “death to America,” in Karachi. These protests mean nothing and will never mean anything to me…you know why?

-Terrorists kill 131 people in Iraq
-Al Qaeda bombs Amman hotel, killing Muslims including a wedding party
-Overall, Al Qaeda and terrorist insurgents have killed tens of thousands innocent Muslims in Iraq
-AL Qaeda has killed people in Pakistan.

So, until I see protests condemning the killing of their own people by terrorists I don’t really care what they protest! I’m waiting to see these so called “enraged” people get upset at the group that has killed more Muslims then the US. In Iraq the majority of casualties are from terrorists [Islamic] targeting and killing innocent people…where the hell is the outrage at that! How many innocent people have they killed in Iraq…20,000 maybe 40,000? They kill and target Muslims for slaughter every single day and now all of a sudden they care about ten or so people killed by accident! Until there are tens of thousands of protests against the Muslim-killing group Al Qaeda, this protest means nothing

If the far-left and anti-war groups try and make this into the, “evil America” game I will go off. I can hear these people now; “America is causing terrorism by killing innocent Muslims, and it’s our fault they hate us.” That is what the left is going to do and will be waiting to report that anti-American propaganda. The media has jumped all over the chance to use the headline “Pakistan Rallies to Condemn the US”. The headline should read, "Pakistan does not care about their people."

--Breaking News: Al-Zawahri Was Supposed to Be At Attack Site

A Typical Run-in With the Insane Liberal

Tonight I was skimming through some left wing sites, namely Ariana Huffington's blog the Huffington Post. It led to the typical exchange of me asking for proof and then some idiot going off into a rant about how he is a liberal and blah blah blah.
Huffington Post has a scam story about how the Bush Administration ordered a smear campaign against John Murtha. Of Course this was the typical Bush-bashing story that provided no evidence or credibility. So I asked a very simple question that upset the intolerant liberal. Huffington Post Comments

I asked in reference to the smear accusation:
--"So, is there evidence of this smear campaign? Where are the documents, facts or credible sources? We reasonable people are waiting…I have skimmed through some of these typical left wing commentaries before and there is one thing they all have in common. The commonality is the lack of investigatory evidence and substance put forth to substantiate such partisan claims. I hope to see the irrefutable evidence you possess...but I doubt it exists."

And this is how I was proven wrong by a liberal using its keen intellect (word for word, this is what the moron had to say)
--"You no like it here, you f*ck off. This is a liberal sight and we talk amongst each other. There is no need to prove anything to a carved in granite neocon, lamo such as yourself. By the way shove your itsy bitsy conservative blog sight up your ass."


Notice how it says “this is a liberal site and we talk amongst each other.” That is the group think mentality that has infected morons such as this for a long time now. I read through a lot of the comments and it’s nothing but the same ol’ same ol’. It’s the ignorant liberal at its finest. I guess the lesson is; you can't reason with the unreasonable.

Human Engineering and Nazism

Outside of the abortion issue in America, I had this thought that maybe some of you can speak to. Now, I am for limited abortion but as I mentioned, this is not necessarily about the issue itself.

I'm writing this as a concerned American for the future. I will preface by saying that if I were in this situation I might do the same thing.

86% of fetuses diagnosed with Down syndrome in America are aborted. The reason this upsets me is because, in a way, it seems like Nazism. To me it's like weeding out the weak breed of humanity in order to create the master race. As a person who loathes the comparisons made by some politicos to our county to Nazi Germany, I say this with all do respect.

Separate yourself from our current reality and ask, does terminating genetically weak humans sound like something, if the Nazis were capable of doing, they would do. I was thinking about the future of genetic engineering and I must say it's frightening. I understand the use and agree with stem cell research but that's not what I'm referring to. I have problems with engineering your children’s hair color, physical attributes etc. Morality calls on us to control our technology and our medical advancements. The thought of genetically modifying a child for reasons outside of health is terribly upsetting. We know science rarely can be stopped and usually does not wait to ask the moral questions necessary to ensure our societal underpinning. Trying to justify and make human engineering acceptable is reminiscent of Nazi Germany’s attempts to create the “ideal” human. Of Course there are huge differences between current genetic research and the wish for a master race but there are also dreadful similarities. Will the Godless want of creating what I now refer to as “stock” children be stemmed by morality or will it surpass the goals of the Third Reich with a more subtle yet more effective application of human engineering?

Liberalism and Intolerance

Extreme Liberalism is the most intolerant form of politics. If you disagree with affirmative action you're a racist. If you speak out against terrorism you're anti-Muslim. If you disagree with terminating a growing life by crushing its skull you hate women and their rights. If you’re for civil Unions you hate gay people. If you believe in God you're some idiot far-right zealot. If you’re against the ACLU because they push the minorities view on the majority you're against civil liberty. Liberals play the race card like there was no tomorrow. They slander and lie while they pretend to be righteous. Republicans aren't the intolerant party that's reserved for democrats.

Liberalism of this kind endangers the country on many levels. First and foremost, are the national security issues we face today. Their standard operating procedure prior to 9-11 was to cut Intelligence and Defense spending. Now they are complaining about how the intelligence before the war in Iraq was flawed. They spent over a decade trying to dismantle our Intel and Defense and then blame Bush for the CIA and NSA being incompetent organizations. We see how they are intolerant of views that differ from their insane ideology. I have read many blogs that denounced Joseph Lieberman for simply giving a truthful account of the political progress in Iraq. Just for giving his opinion he is attacked. And it’s not just by bloggers, huge left wing activist groups have threatened Joseph Lieberman to shut his mouth and fall in line. We have news commentators like Donny Deutsch who demands free speech but when it is someone he disagrees with he is against that freedom. We saw Cindy Sheehan threaten Hillary Clinton to say she was against the war. We saw far-left groups who claim they are for free speech, denying Hillary Clinton the chance to speak freely.

Extreme Liberalism is a fascist ideology that has now become a movement to shut down the free speech of whom they disagree. It has become an anti-Military movement that is so insane they refuse things like this:
San Francisco refuses the historic WW2 ship the USS Iowa saying, “If I was going to commit any money in recognition of war, then it should be toward peace, given what are war is in Iraq now.” This extreme liberalism is upsetting to me because many people find it acceptable. Unlike Communism or direct fascism, this type of liberalism seems to corrupt youths under the radar. That is why this ideology is among the most intolerant in the country. It is fused together by hypocrisy and intolerance.

Dems Of The Dead

Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein on Judge Alito


Dems Drive Alito's Wife To Tears

I wanted to avoid making another entry about the conformation hearings but the partisanship of the Democratic Party has called for it to be pointed out. As many people know by now, Samuel Alitos wife was brought to tears by the democrat’s attempts to wrongly paint Judge Alito as a racist and a bigot. It is not surprising to me that the heartless Democrats would stoop to the level of mis-characterizing this man’s record and history for no other reason but to make themselves feel better.

There is no reason, given that Judge Alito will be confirmed, for them to attack his character other than to satisfy their far-left base. And that’s what this is all about. We see Hillary Clinton being attacked by the far-left for supporting the war in Iraq. We saw Joseph Lieberman threatened when he gave an opinion that differed from MoveOn.org’s insane ideology. In this case Democrats such as Chuck Schumer have been told to vote no and to attack Judge Alito’s character. There is no doubt that Chuck Schumer will do as he is told and vote no to confirm the well qualified judge. Democrats just don't like democracy when it’s not putting them in power or allowing them to choose judicial nominees.

The Democrats will lie and say that he dodged and did not fully answer questions relevant to the conformation standards. They will lie and say Alito was not candid enough and that forced them to vote no. Of course, this is preplanned and part of their strategy of needless obstruction. These partisan hacks decided, long before the hearings started, to vote against Judge Alito.

Donny Deutsch Calls O'Reilly a Thug

The Typical Hypocrisy.
Tonight Donny Deutsch called Bill O’Reilly a “thug” on his low rated show the Big Idea. He then criticized O’Reilly for criticizing Cindy Sheehan. He attacked Bill O'Reilly because Deutsch said that Cindy Sheehan has the right to say whatever she wants because of her heartbreaking loss. What was typical, is that he attacked Bill O’Reilly for calling for the boycotts of stores that forced their employees to not say Merry Christmas. It’s the typical hypocrisy that embodies Donny Deutsch and his ilk. He calls for free speech then attacks those who speak freely for something he doesn’t like. He said in reference to O’Reilly calling for boycotts, “who the hell is he to decide…” He also showed clips of Bill on David Letterman's show and said that he loved Letterman for asking such questions. Although he ignored the fact that Letterman made himself look ignorant…but that’s the type of thing we expect from people like Donny Deutsch.

What is wrong with saying that Cindy Sheehan has made insane comments directed at this President and about the country; I just said it. Do you have a problem with that Donny? She called the terrorists in Iraq freedom fighters. Her son died for his country and her loss is obviously a deep tragedy for her to deal with. She has freely expressed herself but the fact is, she is aligned with anti-American groups and she has made ridiculous comments. I repsect her right to protest but, in my opinion, she has crossed the line.

Obstructionism: Kennedy Whines Like Baby

Video of the Exchange: Click Here

Ted Kennedy tried to obstruct the conformation hearings today by demanding a vote to subpoena information about a Princeton alumni group Judge Alito was once a part of. In a baby like fit, Kennedy threatened to stop the hearings unless he got his way. However, the committee chairman put the Massachusetts senator in place. This behavior is what I predicted in previous articles and I knew some partisan hack was going to be desperate enough to try this.

Before The War In Iraq

1993, Feb. 26: The World Trade Center was bombed by Al Qaeda. Six people killed and over 1,000 injured.
1993, Oct. 4: 18 US servicemen killed by an Al Qaeda-trained Somalia militia
1996, June 25: 19 US servicemen killed in an attack on a US military housing complex in Saudi Arabia. Al Qaeda and Hezbollah were involved
1998, Feb. 22: Osama Bin Laden issues fatwa against the United States. Bin Laden calls on every Muslim to kill Americans.
1998, Aug. 7: 222 people killed in an Al Qaeda attack on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania
2000, Oct. 12: 17 American sailors killed in a suicide attack on the USS Cole perpetrated by Al Qaeda.
2001, Sept. 11: 3,000 people murdered in the worst attack on US soil.

It seems we were at war long before Iraq. Iraq was not the catalyst for terrorism as many liberals like to claim. Any person who thinks that fighting terrorism makes us less safe, in my opinion, is ignorant of history. This war on terrorism was waged long before George Bush was elected into office and will continue long after his term expires. The appeasement of terrorism displayed during the Clinton Administration was unhelpful in stemming attacks from Al Qaeda, as you can clearly see. So, you unrealistic peace lovers might consider reality for a change. Hey, I’m all for peace… When Americans aren’t being attacked and when a dictator has not used WMD on more than a dozen occasions. Or like Hillary Clinton said, “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock; His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members.” (which is true) I’m all for peace when UN resolutions are being taken seriously and the UN is not systematically corrupt. Remember, when Americans were being attacked in an unrecognized war on terror, we were not in Iraq. At the time, according to liberal logic, we were in an illegal and immoral war launched by Clinton in Kosovo and Bosnia.

Let’s all recognize this. We have not yet been attacked on US soil again. Al Qaeda has called Iraq the central front in this war. Libya voluntarily gave up its WMD program. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Yemen and others have cracked down on Terrorists. Afghanistan has been liberated and elections have been hugely successful. America is truly greeted as liberators there and Afghanistan is now a true ally of the United States. Iraq is still chaotic but that’s really only due to our enemy’s realization that they are losing and need to put up the fight of their lives. But even with the carnage these Insurgents are causing, the Iraqi people have participated in historic elections; formed a constitution; began the political processes of governance; and have taken huge steps in forming a new country. Most importantly, we need to remember this war on terror is serious. Don’t let the Iraqis down like the peace movement let over 3,000,000 slaughtered Cambodians and S. Vietnamese down. The future is at stake and an entire region is at stake.

Is War Inevitable?

Iran has removed the seals on its nuclear enrichment facilities that were placed there, for negotiation purposes, two years ago. This is a major move on the part of Iran to continue its “diplomatic” quest to build nuclear weapons. The top US representative of the IAEA said that, "The regime continues to choose confrontation over co-operation, a choice that deepens the isolation of Iran and harms the interests of the Iranian people."

The new hard-line Iranian president has called for the extermination of Israel, he has called the holocaust a myth and he has vowed to build nuclear reactors. No sane person on this earth believes that Iran is building these nuclear facilities for energy efficiency. It is strongly known that Iran seeks to enrich uranium to build its first nuclear weapon. Even France, given that they are not supporting this regime, is on board in threatening sanctions against Iran.

Recently it was reported that the US and NATO were going through plans for a bombing campaign against Iran. The question is, should the US and NATO attempt to stop the Iranian Government from building nuclear weapons or should we allow Iran to build this type of weapon as it sees fit?
Given that if Iran had these weapons they would likely use them against Israel and other US allies, it’s imperative that the world community does not allow this reckless regime to continue its quest for WMD. I have no doubt that if it gets to the point of no return President Bush will cease playing these useless games and initiate a bombing campaign to hit Iran’s military infrastructure and target all known nuclear facilities. Counting on the world community is iffy but it seems that NATO would be on board, as it should be.

Their High Horse Hypocrisy

I'm waiting for the Transcript to come through so when it does I will provide it here. Chuck Schumer fell in line today with his Far-left handlers by reading an opening statement that seemed to be written by MoveOn.org itself. The conformation hearing of the well Qualified Sam Alito was threatened yesterday with a filibuster by Schumer and other obstructionist democrats. Schumer Threatens Filibuster. Today, in the beginning of the Supreme Court confirmation hearing, we heard Schumer threaten Alito by attempting to order him to answer all questions despite precedent. Schumer also said that this nomination was to “placate the far-right.” Dick Durbin, the democrat who compared the US military to Nazis, is as I type using this hearing to attack the president’s authority to fight the war on terrorism. He is now using the life of Rosa Parks in an attempt to insinuate that Alito will take away are basic freedoms. He is now trying to blame Judge Alito's stance on Coal mining regulation for the Sago mine accident. I can’t type fast enough to write down all of this nonsense.

A Small Sample of The Partisanship:
"In an era when the White House is abusing power, is excusing and authorizing torture and is spying on American citizens, I find Judge Alito's support for an all-powerful executive branch to be genuinely troubling," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.

"Your record raises troubling questions about whether you appreciate the checks and balances in our Constitution...to protect us from a government or a president determined to seize too much power over our lives," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

"The same critics who called the president on the carpet for naming Harriet Miers have rolled out the red carpet for you," Schumer said. "We would be remiss if we did not explore why." Chuck Schumer, D-NY

Obstructionism: The Same Old Game

Chuck Schumer has one thing he wants the new Supreme Court nominee to say in order for him to vote for Samuel Alito. That of Course is that Sam is pro-abortion and will promise to Schumer himself that he will vote in line with the liberals of the Supreme Court. The problem is that John Roberts is not a liberal picked by a liberal president; He is a conservative nominee picked by a conservative president. People like Schumer are using the politics of obstruction to try and raise money from their owners. Tim Russert Takes Down Schumer

Extreme activists groups like MoveOn.org have ordered their employees [the Democrats] to put up a fight against the superbly qualified Sam Alito. After MoveOn.org announced in ’04 that they had “bought and paid for the Democratic Party,” they have been active in manipulating their liberal minions. We saw it when Joseph Lieberman returned from Iraq and was viciously attacked and threatened for praising the political progress there. Now we see Schumer, who was among the few that actually voted against Chief Justice John Roberts, being led by a leash to obstruct the nomination of this current nominee.


Schumer Tries To Explain His Inconsistencies

Get WMP Format Here

Hussein's Terrorist Training Camps.

While visiting a friend’s blog, The Rage Blog, I found out about new information dealing with terrorist training camps in Iraq. It turns out that indeed, according to these newly discovered records, Saddam Hussein trained thousands of terrorists in the years prior to the US led invasion. It’s well known that Iraq had links to individual terrorists but what was never figured by most people, is that Hussein actually trained a substantial number of Islamic Extremists. This, if true, and it looks as if it is, changes the entire political debate. The Administration’s contention that Iraq had substantial ties to terrorism has been in dispute since the beginning of the war. This revelation will end the debate about Hussein and the claim of his secular beliefs preventing him from engaging in Islama-fascist undertakings. As a staunch supporter of enforcing Bill Clinton’s regime change policy, this adds to the importance of removing the Brutal tyrant.

The Weekly standard has obtained conformation of this new evidence from several government officials. The war in Iraq has been used by the opposition party as a tool of political advancement. Will this help expose the Party, who has for good or bad reasons, undermined this war for over a year now? I hope so. We as a country need a legitimate debate on the subject but unfortunately that’s not what we have been exposed to. The facts are: Hussein used WMD to kill his own people and others; Iraq had connections to individual terrorists; Hussein provided aid to Palestinian suicide bombers and provided shelter for terrorists; Hussein invaded Kuwait; He has according to this new evidence, trained thousands of terrorists; Iraq violated 17 UN resolutions; Iraq violated the surrender agreement it signed after the first Gulf War; Hussein was a professed enemy of the United States; Saddam Hussein is a war criminal of the worst kind; Hussein tried to assassinate an American president; Saddam according to Iraqi documents wished to re-constitute his Weapons programs after He along with France and Russia successfully lifted UN sanctions. What say the liberals...

The Media Doesn't Want You To Know

What the American Media does not want you to know.

Three Algerian terrorists were caught, with the aid of wiretaps, in Italy. These terrorists were plotting major attacks against the United States. An Italian newspaper reported this capture and NewsMax has indicated that the attackers were planning to hit US stadiums and other huge venue targets. Italian News Paper

NewsMax- "My impression is that the major media want to use the NSA story to try and impeach the president," says Cliff Kincaid, editor of the Accuracy in Media Report published by the grassroots Accuracy in Media organization.
"If you remind people that terrorists actually are planning to kill us, that tends to support the case made by President Bush. They will ignore any issue that shows that this kind of [wiretapping] tactic can work in the war on terror.”

The key issue is the protection of the American people. I know people think warrant-less wiretaps are illegal but as we know President Clinton and Carter, among others, used this surveillance technique. So the claim that it is illegal does not really negate history or the fact that there has yet to be an investigation proving it was illegal. People on the left still think the war in Iraq was illegal, so they are not the people who should be looked to for the truth. They still claim Bush lied despite all the official investigations proving otherwise. It will be the same for this issue. The president’s actions will be upheld and no charges will be filed.

Bush-Blaming 101

First they blamed him for creating more terrorism.
Then they blamed him for creating global warming.
Then they blamed Bush for Hurricane Katrina.
Now the blame-Bushites are blaming Bush for the Sago Mine accident.
Bush Killed Miners

So, why do they feel the need to attack the president like they do? The Blame-Bushite falls into 3 categories. [Blame-Bush 101]

1. They simply hate George Bush. And they hate while crying for peace in the world. They're hypocrites in case you didn't know.

2. They see a way to use the blame Bush approach. It can rally their base and raise money from the far-left. They do this at any cost to the country.

3. They hate his policies because they are leftist, socialists, anarchists, or of some other crazy ideology.

The Democrats Iraq dilemma:
If we win in Iraq the Dems view it as a Bush victory not an American victory. That means that they view a loss in Iraq as a Bush loss not an American loss.


Breaking News: Al Qaeda Claims US Withdrawal in Iraq as Victory.

Where's The Outrage

In light of this NSA wiretapping scandal and all the outrage being displayed by the left, I thought I would remind them of a simple reality. Notice the camera placed on a street post designed to videotape any American who walks in its range. Without warrant or personal permission these cameras have videoed millions of Americans. These cameras are placed in order to limit Criminal activity and to stop traffic violations. Why? To save lives and to protect innocent Americans; just like spying on suspected terrorists is designed to save lives.. So, which is worse if any? A complex web of cameras tracking all vehicle and individual traffic without personal consent or warrant; or tracking a few thousand suspected terrorist phone calls without warrant or personal permission?

what about the paparazzi using a telephoto lens to take a picture of Lindsey Lohan while she is relaxing in her back yard. Is the left outraged at Lindsey Lohan’s privacy rights being violated or do they only care about the rights of suspected terrorists? This is what I call selective outrage. You see how stupid this entire issue is. The ACLU is videotaping police to try and find incriminating evidence for prosectution.
ACLU Provides Cameras. Trying to catch cops, according to their logic, is more important then trying to catch an extremist cell willing to use a Chemical or Biological weapon on the American people. Fortunately, The American people aren't going to buy into their selective outrage.

Sympathy For Terrorism

While Hollywood is trying to make terrorists and the extremist mentality seem sympathetic to America and the world, these people are purposely slaughtering innocent children. The Hollywood-liberal mentality, of we should not view this type of carnage in the terms of good and evil, is sickening to me. We have "Syriana" trying to give credence to why twisted individuals target innocent civilians to kill for a political or ideological statement. We have “Paradise Now” a film about how two men get recruited for a suicide bombing. Both films are nominated for Golden Globe awards.

Today, over 130 people were murdered by terrorist insurgents in Iraq for no other reason then to prevent freedom and to try to stem the political progress of Iraq. Very sympathetic figures if you ask Hollywood. The far-left wants us to sympathize with mass murderers because they feel that if we know why they commit such vile acts we could negotiate some sort of truce with them. It’s crazy, but crazy is the primary synonym of the far-left. We know what drives a terrorist to kill their own people; impure hatred. They hate for oversimplified reasons that have been smashed into their psyche by the controlling forces of the Middle East. There are very serious and legitimate reasons why many people view the West as corrupt, but that in no way calls for the slaughter of innocent people. Germany, Italy and Japan were our hated enemies during the WW2 era. They killed hundreds of thousands of Americans in an attempt to conquer Europe. That does not mean that today we have the right or the excuse to kill every German, Italian or Japanese person possible. Targeting your own people for destruction simply because they wish to establish a government is not excusable. Strapping a bomb to your torso and walking into a Muslim wedding reception to blow yourself up is not an action worth sympathy. Targeting Iraqi police to scare others not to join up to defend their country, is not an action that warrants sympathy. Do you get it Hollywood? Hating President Bush while giving credence to the barbaric actions of terrorists is very disturbing; but they do it.

Mr. Abramoff Brings Down Washington


With high ranking republicans and high Ranking democrats in the cross-hairs of Jack Abramoff, his life may be in danger. I might be flagged for publishing an article with the word assassination in the text but this plea deal made by Jack Abramoff puts his life at risk. Imagine a lobbyist with detailed information on high ranking government officials who broke the law and who now puts members of the government at risk of serving time in federal prison. Imagine a Washington insider with dirt on major political leaders; both Democrat and Republican. Look at it in Mafia terms. In order to save himself from going to prison, this Mob Hit man, rats out the Gambino family. This man might not make it to court…some “accidental” death might occur before he brings down these political heavyweights. I’m coming out of my Republican shell on this one because my loyalty is to my country first. If it turns out that members of the Republican Party have illegally taken bribes, outside the norm, then they deserve to go to jail. Same with the Democrats…but they have been involved in more corruption than the Republicans, so they’re used to it.

If you are unaware of this man he was the top GOP lobbyist in Washington D.C. He had deals and contributed to both Democrats and Republicans. He recently
plead guilty to fraud charges for a shortened prison sentence in return for evidence against Congressional leaders.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not na├»ve enough to think that corruption is not a part of Washington, but if you get caught then you’re a bad politician. From Tom Delay to Harry Reid, this is going to be quite interesting to see play out.

O'Reilly vs. Letterman


Bill O’Reilly went on David Letterman’s show and faced typical left-wing BS. David Letterman claimed that 60% of what Bill had to say was crap. Then when asked if he ever actually watched Bill’s show, he admitted to never watching it. When asked why it was he thought Bill was full of crap, letterman said because he read it somewhere. Letterman also had problems with Bill bringing up the fact that Cindy Sheehan called the terrorists in Iraq freedom fighters. As if pointing out the fact that Cindy Sheehan has made ridiculous claims against George Bush, means you are trying to silence her right to protest. Any person who says this deserves to be pointed out as a far-left loon: “Now that we have decimated [Iraq], the borders are open, freedom fighters from other countries are going in, and [U.S. troops] have created more terrorism by going to an Islamic country."

Remember when I wrote a piece not to long ago on the Qualifications of The Liberal Blogger. Qualification # 3 was: “You hate Fox News because someone told you to hate Fox News.” Well, of course what I wrote is true and Letterman did what most on the left do, and that’s believe what they're told to believe without evidence or substance. Why is it that these people end up fitting the mold of the typical Hollywood Liberal? Letterman and Jon Stewart and all of these morons have no clue about anything relevant to politics…Jon Stewart is not even funny.


Video:O'Reilly vs. Letterman