Powell Told Bush More Troops Were Needed

Colin Powell, in an interview today, said that he told President Bush, prior to the invasion of Iraq, that he should send more troops than wanted by Donald Rumsfeld and General Tommy Franks. He felt that the troop levels were inadequate for the security of Iraq especially after the fall of Baghdad. "I made the case to Gen. Franks and Secretary Rumsfeld before the president that I was not sure we had enough troops. The case was made, it was listened to, it was considered. ... A judgment was made by those responsible that the troop strength was adequate."

"The president's military advisers felt that the size of the force was adequate, they may still feel that years later. Some of us don't, I don't," Powell said. "In my perspective, I would have preferred more troops but you know, this conflict is not over."

"At the time the president was listening to those who were supposed to be providing him with military advice," Powell said. "They were anticipating a different kind of immediate aftermath of the fall of Baghdad, it turned out to be not exactly as they had anticipated."

He turned out to be exactly right and the refusal to heed the
Powell Doctrine has led to what we see in Iraq today. This is a very important subject to discuss because the more honorable men like Colin Powell come forward and point out the idiocy of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, the better. Make no mistake, we are losing in Iraq and we will lose in Iraq if nothing is done to change the current failed strategy. It is a monumental failure that calls for the current Secretary of Defense to be immediately fired for his obvious incompetence in regards to the Iraq war. The insurgency is getting stronger and more sophisticated and has infiltrated many, if not all, of the Iraqi security force apparatus. And Rummy sits back giving us the BS of “I do what the Generals tell me and they say they have what they need”. Give me Fuckin’ break!

American soldiers are dying and their mission is heading towards failure and the only way to salvage their sacrifice is to send more U.S. troops into Iraq. Is it that hard to see? Are people on the right and in the Administration so blind they can’t allow themselves to see what the hell is going on? We are LOSING! The DOD’s plan must be changed and must be changed fast. The war in Iran is inevitable and being bogged down in Iraq because of a failed strategy is unacceptable. Not to mention the needless casualties that the military is sustaining because their damn Hummers are not armored and the DOD can’t even provide adequate body armor to the troops on the ground. Wake Up! What the President needs to do is to fire Rumsfeld and ask Colin Powell to replace him. We need someone who knows how to fight a war. Not only is it vitally important to replace the Secretary of Defense but if you replace him with the honorable Colin Powell, it will automatically raise the President's poll numbers. Do something.

The Truth about the Immigration Protests

I was thinking about the immigration boycott that is scheduled for Monday, May 1st. I was wondering why exactly are these protests happening and who is organizing them. What I realized is that there is a group of people behind the scenes that are pulling the strings of the immigrants and illegal aliens that are marching in the streets. It’s one of the largest direct exploitations probably ever and I’ll try to explain why.

The puppeteers of this upcoming event, and most of the others, are after one thing and one thing only. And that is complete amnesty for Mexican natives that cross our border illegally. These protests, for the organizers, have nothing whatsoever to do with illegal immigrants and human rights; it has nothing to do with that. It’s a ruse that is being used to push a more extremist agenda. At first, I thought they wanted amnesty because they really cared about workers rights, but after thinking about it, I came to the obvious conclusion. I asked, why does this group of organizers want a complete open border with America and why are they pushing so hard to get it. And then the simplest explanation came to me and now I’m sure that I know what this is all about.

This is about a group of Mexican-American extremists who are using these immigrants to re-conquer the Southwestern United States. It’s a backdoor effort to take back the territory that these people feel is rightfully theirs. And they’re exploiting the timidness in Washington, the bleeding-heart left, and the lack of security at our southern border. They are not looking to take it back, at least not yet, with weapons or war but with an overwhelming flood of Mexican immigrants. This became evident to me after watching Javier Rodriguez, the organizer of the upcoming May Day protest and nationwide boycott, on Fox News. Watch his attitude and his behavioral pattern, especially his anti-American tendency to say, “your” president and “your” country instead of our president and our country. He also attacked the US military and insulted a mother of a US soldier fighting in Iraq while bringing up the year 1848. She became upset and fired back at Rodriguez. [Watch Video:
WMV or MP4 via ETL]

I’m close to certain that I’m right when I say this is about regaining territory that Mexico lost, and or sold, as a result or precursor to the
Mexican-American war. And if you have watched the video and the attitude of the event planner then I’m hoping that you can recognize what is going on as well. It’s a very devious scheme especially when we see how these groups are trying to tie the protests to the American Civil Rights Movement. Everything, being said by these people, is propaganda designed to get sympathetic Americans to become unknowingly complicit in their effort to change our country. We are beginning to see hints of their true goal but I think that many people gloss over what they see because they assume it's part of a “righteous” effort for “equality”. That assumption could not be any further from the truth. Albeit, many people marching are doing so because they wish to be part of America and wish to have some representational acknowledgement of their contribution to American society. Those people that wish to be Americans and work hard to assimilate should be praised for their efforts.

But as I said, the honest working immigrants are being exploited by people whose ulterior motive is the cultural and symbolic destruction of America. They want their territory back and since they can’t fight for it like honorable men they are doing what they can, which is what’s happening now, to plant the Mexican seed in the United States. The Mexican-extremists know the birth rate of Hispanics and they are counting on a complete flood of illegal immigrants birthing numerous children to eventually become numerically superior in the southern states; effectively taking back the territory they feel is theirs. That is what is happening and that is what you will not hear in the media.

United Flight 93

As an American this film is important to me and I’m sure that it's importatnt to many other people. The debate about it being too soon or too late is somewhat antiquated because it happened and these people existed. This group of individuals came together in the most dire of circumstances and they elevated themselves to the status of Hero; Heroes in the purest of sense. This war is about TRUTH. The truth that is only witnessed when life becomes angelic and when action becomes the soul of America.

Do you know what it means to be an American? It’s when a plane is hijacked by genocidal extremists that plan to kill our fellow countrymen in our nation's capital by slamming an airliner into populated targets; while we plan to take it back with honor and strength and when the face of evil meets with the face of American citizens who declare, “LET’S ROLL” and sacrifice their lives to save others. That's what it means.


May We Never Forget

Socialists: “Chimps are People Too”

The Spanish Socialist Party will introduce a bill in the Congress of Deputies calling for "the immediate inclusion of (simians) in the category of persons, and that they be given the moral and legal protection that currently are only enjoyed by human beings." The PSOE's justification is that humans share 98.4% of our genes with chimpanzees, 97.7% with gorillas, and 96.4% with orangutans.

The party will announce its Great Ape Project at a press conference tomorrow. An organization with the same name is seeking a UN declaration on simian rights which would defend ape interests "the same as those of minors and the mentally handicapped of our species."

According to the Project, "Today only members of the species Homo sapiens are considered part of the community of equals. The chimpanzee, the gorilla, and the orangutan are our species's closest relatives. They possess sufficient mental faculties and emotional life to justify their inclusion in the community of equals."
[
Story]

Well, at least we know where they stand on the important issues. Does this mean they have the right to vote? Can you imagine a bunch of poo-flinging monkeys voting in important elections…OK some did vote for Kerry but is this really necessary, I mean come on! The next thing you know gorillas will be demanding guaranteed jobs and, heaven help us, same-sex marriages. We will have rabid Chimps marching in the streets yelling “No Blood for Bananas” while eating their own crap.

Then again, that sounds oddly familiar to today’s Europe…Viva la Chimp! And the article claims that the same group is “seeking a UN declaration on simian rights which would defend ape interests”. Shit, all they have to do is get the ape to develop nuclear weapons and I’m sure the United Nations will embrace(-) the proposal.

“Crashing The Gate” Crashed at the Gate

It seems that the Daily Kos clown has no talent…I know, what’s new? But according to Nielsen BookScan and reported by Drudge, his book, “Crashing the Gate” is a total flop (outside of the internet circle), just like the radio network known as Air America. Running an internet site, that is visited by the liberal internet-folk, is somewhat different than writing a book that people want to read. It takes no talent whatsoever to post the articles that are posted at his site. The only reason it gets hits is because it spews the typical BS that only the mentally challenged care to read. Hell, all I have to do to get a million hits from the visitors he gets, is to start a blog that says the following...An Opinionnation free-write.

The Quagmire that is the quagmire is controlled by Halliburton because oil is king to them and the war is for oil. Impeach Bush for enforcing Clinton’s regime change policy because he caused a Hurricane on the gulf coast because black people were there and we know how Democrats love black people. I thought spying never happened under the NSA…I really thought it was No Such Agency. The economy or Economy or whatever is bad. Not good economy just bad. Bush is to blame for bad economy because we said so even though all the latest economic numbers proves us Democrats wrong. We still say it because people believe us. We like Mexicans but Republicans don’t, they hate Mexicans and Indians and Pakistanis and they hate Jews and black people.

We liberals like drinking wine coolers while pretending we care because it makes us feel better. We don’t play politics with war we love war but hate this war and love the troops even though they are Nazis and terrorists but we can all support the troops but not the war, right? Bush betrayed his country by going to war and the Democrats who voted for it were in a Harry Potter spell that turned Kennedy into a frog and the rest of us into mindless sheep. Iraq is a Civil war because Sean Penn went down to Iraq and let the world know the truth. Bush lied, thousands died and stuff… Saddam was a great leader…we liberals remember how beautiful and peaceful Iraq was before the war because Michael Moore said it was peaceful. We love America; the land that is to blame for everything including genocide in Africa, global warming, death and destruction, hurricanes, and Aids…but we all love America. Evil Republicans. Boo, hoo, hoo.

Basically, when it comes to satisfying the hate-thirst of liberal America, all that is needed is a website and a comment section. It’s a groupthink beyond any groupthink that you could possibly imagine. It’s like a minion of mentally misguided misfits that miss every point and make no attempt to be accurate. And that is why a no-talent blogger such as the Kos clown can’t sell any books. No one outside of the unhinged care about some guy saying the same thing every person of his ilk says every day of the week. And not even the mainstream media pushing his book helped him; and that is the same with Air America. They have the major media propping them up but what they always forget, is that no serious person cares to buy their products.

EU: No Proof of CIA Human Rights Violations

This is a story I doubt you have heard about because it contradicts the outrage displayed by many in America and throughout the world. Specifically, the Democrats and the mainstream media who exploited the Mary McCarthy leak to the Washington Post and the CIA plane route leak to the New York Times. During that time period the Democratic party went crazy with attacks on the Bush Administration claiming that he ordered torture and used secret prisons and he should be impeached. And they claimed that we are no better than our terrorist enemy. We saw major Democrats splash themselves all over the cable news programs, condemning the President in an attempt to eek out some more votes; we saw whose side they were on and how far they would go to score cheap political points. But, as usual, the facts and investigations discount their slanderous charges just like the Silberman-Robb Commission concluded Bush did not lie about pre-war Intel and just like the FISA Act author testified that Bush has done nothing illegal in terms of the NSA terrorist surveillance program.

(
Associated Press)BRUSSELS, Belgium — Investigations into reports that U.S. agents shipped prisoners through European airports to secret detention centers have produced no evidence of illegal CIA activities, the European Union's anti-terror coordinator said Thursday.

The investigations also have not turned up any proof of secret renditions of terror suspects on EU territory, Gijs de Vries told a European Parliament committee investigating the allegations.
The European Parliament's inquiry and a similar one by the continent's leading human-rights watchdog are looking into whether U.S. intelligence agents interrogated al-Qaida suspects at secret prisons in Eastern Europe and transported some on secret flights through Europe.

But investigators have not identified any human-rights violations, despite more than 50 hours of testimony by human-rights activists and individuals who claimed to have been abducted by U.S. intelligence agents, de Vries said.

"We've heard all kinds of allegations, impressions; we've heard also refutations. It's up to your committee to weigh if they are true. It does not appear to be proven beyond reasonable doubt," he said. "There has not been, to my knowledge, evidence that these illegal renditions have taken place."

The Dead Haven’t the Luxury of Regret

Why won't these Iran sympathizers just admit that they would rather have them build nuclear weapons, pass it on to terrorists and have millions of people killed, then have the United States use air strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities?

That is what we are dealing with and this is very important to understand. A large number of people across the world have sided with Iran in order to have something to poke in the eye of America. Because they view Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb as a victory against what they ignorantly claim is American imperialism. Their blind hatred has led them to an existence that calls genocide peace, rape and torture acceptable, and a nuclear armed Iran a good thing. (Let me explain that because the left won’t get it.) Hussein was committing genocide but according to these people we were the bad guy that broke the peace-genocide is a peaceful world to them, especially when weighed against the US using military force to overthrow a regime; Which also makes rape and torture acceptable to them because they would rather have that continue then have the US intervene.

With that in mind it makes it easier to understand why so many people in Europe and America have come to defend Iran. We will hear them claim that Iran is only after peaceful nuclear technology for energy efficiency. They will do this because they must, given their disease, be against anything that they view as being the position of the Bush administration. And that is the key you have to remember. These people are willing to ignore the obvious quest of Iran to build nuclear weapons simply so they are not put in a position to be in agreement with President Bush (they will deny this). That is their motivation when they argue against US action or argue in favor of Iran building nuclear weapons. Of course, other people are just anti-war to the point in which they think that negotiation with groups like Al Qaeda is possible. This group of people is less threatening because their ignorance is obvious and their message is unambiguous. But those that are manipulated by anti-Americanism are the ones we have to keep in check. And remember, some of these people are members of the “world community”. The UN is filled with these people and they will work against our interests and endanger every American. Never buy into their so-called “diplomatic” measures. The UN has voted Iran to sit on the Disarmament Commission, and the UN places human rights violators on their Human Rights Council. This is a vast effort to undermine the United States and to elevate our enemies; to give them legitimacy. If you don’t keep your eyes open to this and if nothing is done, the dead bodies from the dirty bomb won’t have the luxury of regret. Oh, by the way, Iran has
vowed to pass on its nuclear technology; and it will be to terrorists…

Kerry Claims American Troops are Stupid

During the same ABC interview in which John Kerry praised the CIA traitor Mary McCarthy, he condemned American soldiers for getting killed by IEDs. WTF!
"But there is no excuse, three and a half years later, for American troops to be driving by IEDs and getting blown up. Are you telling me they can’t drive a truck!" (click below or picture to see clip)

WMV Video or MP4 video via ETL

And if you have time to watch a video that perfectly highlights how the Democrats, specifically John Kerry, have undermined our war in Iraq, check this out. Watch how it changed...It's amazing!

John Kerry Video

To The Fellow American

In the gray world where the necessary evils reign, life hangs in the balance. Freedom itself, when at risk, will circumvent the limitations that its enemy refuses to live by. Those limitations, the restraint so aptly prided, must be drawn down for survival. And make no mistake, victory depends on it. One can flinch at the necessity of tactical warfare or one can accept reality in hopes that after the bloodshed our values will become stronger. Naïve ideals give us strength but at the same time they have the potential to cause great harm; because from the winds of the cloud suffering and death will be found. The freedom, as I know it, will stop at nothing to prevent that occurrence. Although, you might disagree, deep down I think you understand. When serious situations become deadly remember that we are one despite the intolerance and misguided philosophies. And remember, there is a fine line between dissent and treachery.

-Opinionnation, Anthony Tafoya-

John Kerry Praises Treason

John Kerry, in an interview on ABC, supported Mary McCarthy’s illegal leak of the “black site” story to the Washington Post. This interview (linked below) is conducted by George Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton aid who is questioning John Kerry about the CIA traitor who also happens to be a democrat that contributed to the ’04 Democratic campaign. Expect softball and misleading questions from George. And watch for the patented Kerry flip-flops.

In this interview John Kerry praised the CIA official that leaked classified information to the Washington Post. When asked by Stephanopoulos what his view of the issue is, he said this: "I don’t know whether she did it or not so it’s hard to have a view on it. Here’s my fundamental view of this, that you have somebody being fired from the CIA for allegedly telling the truth, and you have no one fired from the white house for revealing a CIA agent in order to support a lie. That underscores what’s really wrong in Washington, DC."
[First, she admitted leaking the information and was caught lying about it. Secondly, Kerry in a typical dodge tried comparing the Plame incident to this issue, which doesn’t make sense. This is about a proven Kerry supporter in the CIA that damaged our national security to attack the Administration. It’s about treason and Mary McCarthy aiding and abetting terrorists for political gain.] -Note: Democrats will always bring up the Plame incident to dodge this issue.

Then Stephanopoulos asked, should a CIA officer be able to make decisions of their own (in terms of leaks), Kerry responded, "Of course not. A CIA agent has the obligation to uphold the law and clearly leaking is against the law, and nobody should leak. But if you’re leaking to tell the truth, Americans are going to look at that, at least mitigate or think about what are the consequences that you, you know, put on that person. Obviously they’re not going to keep their job, but there are other larger issues here. You know, classification in Washington is a tool that is used to hide the truth from the American people…it has become a tool to hide the truth from Americans."
[Kerry in his first response attacked the administration for allegedly declassifying Intel to counter the obvious falsities of Joe Wilson, but in his second response he said, “Classification in Washington is a tool that is used to hide the truth from the American people.” So, he flip-flopped because if classification is a tool to hide the truth and the Administration declassified info so the truth could come out, then what’s his problem? He flip-flopped again when he said nobody should leak but if you’re leaking to tell the truth, it’s OK. And when he uses the word “truth” he is referring to the act of betrayal committed by McCarthy. Nice spin Kerry.]

And to wrap it up (and remember what “truth” means) Kerry said, “So I’m glad she told the truth but she’s going to obviously suffer the consequences of breaking the law.” Democrats condoning treason…
Who would have thought.
WMV or MP4 Video of Interview via ETL

Dean: Republicans “Cut and Run” in New Orleans

We "cut and run" in regards to Katrina…is that so, Deany boy? Gee, you got us there. But let me see if I can respond anyway... Once again we see the Democratic Party trying to exploit the death and destruction caused by Hurricane Katrina. They have proven that they will stop at nothing to regain power and that includes endangering the nation as seen with the CIA official/ Kerry contributor who leaked Intel to the Washington Post (Story).

You might remember that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee was caught trying to raise political funds by exploiting the deaths of their fellow citizens in the aftermath of Katrina…it was sickening. While people were dying and while the Coast Guard was trying to rescue people Chuck Schumer and the Democrats were only concerned with raising money…and of course blaming the President. They were caught red-handed by the Associated Press using Katrina to raise funds (AP Story). Remember this because anytime you hear anyone like Howard Dean or Chuck Schumer talk about Katrina or the aftermath, you know they are full of S#!t. Now with the truth in mind let’s see what the DNC is planning and saying.

(
Reuters) -The Democrats chose New Orleans for their spring meeting in part to highlight the administration's heavily criticized handling of Katrina, which killed more than 1,300 people, displaced hundreds of thousands of people and shattered New Orleans and the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Dean said Democrats offered values based on community and opportunity and a more inclusive vision for the future.

"I think Americans are tired of being lectured to by Republicans who have brought a culture of corruption, cronyism and incompetence to Washington," he said. "They offer a legacy of more of the same -- deficits, divisiveness and deceit...Republicans have cut and run when it comes to rebuilding the Gulf Coast, and we will not do that." He said voters would judge President George W. Bush's administration and the Republicans on their slow response to Hurricane Katrina and failure to develop a suitable recovery plan.-

The Democrats, after pissing on the faces of the victims of Katrina, now have the audacity to exploit that disaster again! Isn’t it somewhat hypocritical for the Dems to attack the President for doing whatever is necessary to fight the war on terror but at the same time they do whatever is necessary, including betraying the country, to get elected? And Dean mentioned a “culture of corruption”. Did he mean this:
Senior House Ethics Committee Democrat Steps Down.

CIA Traitor Worked for Clinton

TREASON!

When I’m right…I’m right. It turns out the CIA official that illegally disclosed the location of terrorist prison facilities inside Europe worked for and was appointed by the Clinton Administration. It gets better, she was also a John Kerry supporter...hmm, coincidence? Her name is Mary McCarthy and "public records show that Ms. McCarthy contributed $2,000 in 2004 to the presidential campaign of John Kerry, the Democratic nominee." She also contributed $5,000 to the Ohio Democratic Party.

-View contribution records here PML: Select 02, 04, 06 election cycle and type in McCarthy. It is contribution # 1,511 and 1,512.

If you do not know the story: Someone in the CIA leaked, to the Washington post, information on secret US prisons that housed high-ranking terrorists. They came to be known as “black sites” and it was reported that these facilities were utilized to extract information from hardened Al Qaeda. The story became a huge controversy and claims the President Bush ordered torture was the main theme from the Democratic Party. An investigation was launched and yesterday it concluded that it was Mary McCarthy who illegally released the Intel that damaged the country. [Story]

This illegal outing was politically motivated and it caused great harm to the American people and to CIA operatives serving oversees. It specifically endangered the workers at the prison facilities and definitely aided and abetted our enemy. We are at war with global terrorism and as I said before, there is a certain sect of the media that is actively working against the United States. Many Democrats are also willing to assist our enemies for political gain and that includes current politicians. I will say it again and again and again until this outrage has seeped in the minds of the American people. Many in the Democratic Party and the media have betrayed their country simply to attack the current President of the United States.

I want this traitor arrested, charged and executed for the obvious treason she committed that was driven by political motivation. The Democratic Party should be ashamed of itself for the constant undermining of the war on terror that began with their lies about the run up to the war in Iraq. Those in office who condemned the Valerie Plame leak while at the same time condoning this act of betrayal should step down and the liberals who did the same have, once again, been proven to be the worst type of Americans in this country. I have said this and will continue to say this because the truth demands that these politicians and the media be exposed for what they are.

CIA Traitor Fired for Intel Leak

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The CIA said on Friday that it fired an intelligence officer for leaking classified information that sources said contributed to a Washington Post report about secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe.

The CIA said the dismissal of a CIA officer over a media leak was extremely rare and resulted from a three-month-old in-house investigation aimed at agency operations that had been the subject of recent media leaks. "This CIA officer acknowledged having unauthorized discussions with the media in which the officer knowingly shared classified intelligence, including operational information," CIA spokeswoman Michele Neff said.

Finally! With the rabid press scrounging around for stories they can use to attack the President, the best thing our Intel services can do is take this type of leak seriously. If you recall, this had to do with the disclosing of the so-called “Black Sites” inside Europe that housed suspected terrorists. A very reasonable thing in terms of a covert operation designed to aid in the tracking and killing of terrorists around the world. You might recall that this story broke during the heated debate over the Valerie Plame incident during which time the Democrats shamelessly attempted to capitalize on the phony story. At that time I wrote, "Is it not hypocrisy for a newspaper to illegally reveal a covert operation and have no Democrats crying about it? The Washington Post put America in danger by selfishly revealing the fact that the CIA has prison facilities [Black Sites] stationed in certain areas inside Europe. The left has been more than eager to use this ousted secret CIA operation to try to damage the Administration. Valerie Plame was claimed to be endangered but when the military and the CIA are actually in danger, unlike the Plame incident, they are perfectly fine with it. In fact they are so fine with this; they use it as a basis for an anti-military, anti-American onslaught. I find it amazingly hypocritical that people are reveling in the outing of a secret CIA operation while at the same time loathing the Valerie Plame “leak” case."

And after the Justice Department announced it was going to investigate the leak in December I wrote, "I’m sure the far left in this country are excited about the Justice Department beginning its investigation of who leaked vital National Security information to the Wash. Post. We saw their feigned outrage over the leaking of the name of Valerie Plame to Robert Novak, so now we’re sure to see their outrage at this obviously more important Intelligence leak… Well, at least if the Democratic Party was truthful, we would see it. I have yet to hear the Democrats yell and whine about the illegal outing of secret prisons in Europe and the ousting of classified information on CIA plane routes transporting terrorist suspects. You heard them claim that releasing Valerie Plame’s CIA status put her and the CIA in danger. Why haven’t we heard them yelling about how giving our terrorist enemy vital information like prison facilities and plane routes, puts the CIA and our military in danger? Why the silence when the New York Times releases an illegal leak that clearly damages our National Security. Why the fake outrage with the Valerie Plame case and the silence when the CIA and the American people are truly endangered?"

So now the Democrats have a chance to prove they are not the party that constantly hurts our country for political gain. All they have to do is apologize for being hypocrites and then praise the CIA for firing the individual that caused great harm to our country. And after that all they have to do is condemn the Democratic Party as a whole, including the Washington Post and the New York Times, for purposely hurting our country to launch partisan attacks on the current Administration.

Bill Clinton Gave Iran Nuclear Blueprints

According to reports and a New York Times reporter, Bill Clinton authorized the CIA to give nuclear bomb blueprints to the Iranian regime. Last night, radio talk show host and former US Justice Department official Mark Levin shocked many listeners when he reported that President Bill Clinton gave nuclear technology to the Iranians in a harebrained scheme. He said that the transfer of classified data to Iran was personally approved by then-President Clinton and that the CIA deliberately gave Iranian physicists blueprints for part of a nuclear bomb that likely helped Tehran advance its nuclear weapons development program.

The CIA, using a double-agent Russian scientist, handed a blueprint for a nuclear bomb to Iran, according to a new book "State of War" by James Risen, the New York Times reporter, who exposed the Bush administration's controversial NSA spying operation, claims the plans contained fatal flaws designed to derail Tehran's nuclear drive.

But the deliberate errors were so rudimentary they would have been easily fixed by sophisticated Russian nuclear scientists, the book said. The operation, which took place during the Clinton administration in early 2000, was code named Operation Merlin and "may have been one of the most reckless operations in the modern history of the CIA," according to Risen.
[National Ledger]

This story has been kept under wraps by many in the media, in fact, it has gone unreported. However, the other revelation of the NY Times reporter who wrote this book, was his exposing of the NSA’s terrorist surveillance program. Now, the media jumped all over that story and created an unnecessary controversy that continues today. So, one might ask why the allegation that the CIA, with the authority of Bill Clinton, assisted Iran in its quest to build nuclear weapons has yet to be blown out of proportion? Which is more important, a President recklessly advancing Iran’s nuclear prospect or George Bush tracking suspected terrorists by legally bypassing the FISA Court? If you ask me and most people, giving nuclear technology to Iran is a far more important story than tracking suspected terrorists…well, at least if your agenda is simply reporting on the news not pushing anti-Bush rhetoric. Two stories in the same book; and the one that gets picked up is the non-story about tracking terrorists…WTF!

The New York Times reporter James Risen calls this, “one of the most reckless operations in modern history” and the damn press ignored it. What was Bill Clinton thinking if he even was thinking? Let’s put this in perspective shall we. Clinton believed North Korea’s promise to suspend their weapons technology which led to North Korea creating at least two or three nuclear bombs. And before that, Mr. Clinton refused to extradite a Muslim man by the name of Osama Bin Laden which led to the attacks of 9/11. Now it comes out that Billy Boy thought providing Iran with nuclear blueprints was a good idea.

Sometimes, I think the idea of a vast left-wing media is somewhat overblown even though I know it exists on some levels. But when the press, in their misguided love for the Clintons, refuses to point out huge stories and willingly hypes non-stories to attack President Bush, well then one can’t argue with reality. The whiny left is busy complaining about this and that…why don’t they complain about the massive failure known as the 42 president of the United States. His failures led to 9/11 which led to Iraq. His idiocy helped Iran with its nuclear weapons program and his gullibility led to N. Korea acquiring nuclear weapons. WHERE’S THE OUTRAGE!?!
Hat Tip:
RWRM

UN Elects Iran to head Disarmament Commission

Jerusalem (CNSNews.com) - Under threat of United Nations Security Council sanctions for its own nuclear program, Iran has been elected to a vice-chair position on the U.N. Disarmament Commission, whose mission includes deliberations on preventing the spread of nuclear weapons.The commission's deliberations began last Monday and are scheduled to continue until April 28. On the first day of the commission meeting, Iran along with Uruguay and Chile was elected as one of eight vice-chairs, elected to serve for one year.

Isn’t that something…Maybe the UN has been asleep for several years because I don’t know if they are aware of this, but Iran is spearheading its own WMD program. That might need to be repeated…IRAN IS A TERRORIST STATE THAT IS BUILDING NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND HAS THREATENED TO DESTROY ISRAEL. This is what Sen. Norm Coleman (R) had to say about this: "The election of Iran as a vice-chair of the U.N. Disarmament Commission at the same time as Iran clandestinely pursues its own nuclear ambitions provides yet another example of the U.N.'s inability to establish credible institutions to deal with global issues. Having the Iranians serve on this commission is like asking the fox to guard the hens, and will only ensure its ineffectiveness."

This is an outrage! Not only has the UN placed the world's worst human rights violators on their Human Rights Council but now they decide to place Iran on the Disarmament Commission. Are you fuckin' kidding me! If Hitler was still alive, I’m sure the United Nations would honor him with an award for world peace. This is the same group that John Kerry wanted the U.S. to take orders from. This has to be the last straw, doesn’t it? The United States should stop all funding and all support for this anti-Semitic and pro-terrorist organization that has an agenda against our country. In the Twilight Zone in which we live, this is shockingly typical behavior on the part of the world community. How many times do I have to point this out for people on the left to understand what’s going on. And I predicted this on Monday saying, “The world community will also weigh in on the situation by downplaying the significant steps Iran has taken in its research and development phase of nuclear technology. The UN will do this because they are pacifists.”


This is what is going on, the UN is doing what it can to support Iran’s “right” to acquire nuclear weapons. It's funny because America has been the focus of the world's hatred but actual terrorists have their sympathy. It’s also amazing because the U.S. withdrew its name from the Human Rights nomination process because it was likely that they would not be nominated due to the over-hyping of Guantanamo and Abu Grhiab. The UN condemns the United States for removing a brutal dictator, they condemn the United States for imprisoning terrorists but they reward terrorist states and those who espouse anti-Semitic views. It’s quite clear that the United Nations is pro-terrorist, pro-oppression but anti-American… Is there one legitimate reason why the US should not discontinue funding such an organization?

Clinton and Reid Blame Bush for Abortion

In a joint statement put out by senators Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid, they blamed President Bush and Republicans for the growing abortion rates in America. They claim that cuts in some health care programs have led to unwanted pregnancies with lower income individuals. “Most of these unintended pregnancies -- and the resulting abortions -- can be prevented if we eliminate the barriers that prevent women from having access to affordable and effective contraception…Ironically, those advocating the loudest for an outright ban on abortion are too often the same people who oppose prevention initiatives and instead support making contraception less accessible, particularly for low-income women who are more likely to have unplanned pregnancies…President Bush and the Republican majority in Congress have promoted budget cuts for a wide range of programs that would provide critical supports for low-income pregnant women and their children.”

It’s a typical mindset that shirks personal responsibility and places blame on outside circumstances. Because condoms and other contraceptives are so expensive, I mean that couple of dollars is for my beer, I can’t waste it. First of all, what data proves that unintended pregnancies are the result of barriers preventing women from “affordable and effective contraception?” And it’s not that expensive, unless, of course, you are referring to drugs like the morning after pill. If that’s the case then Clinton and Reid are basically saying that these people are so dumb that they are incapable of realizing that they can’t afford more expensive pregnancy prevention beforehand, and so it’s the government’s responsibility to care for them. And their joint statement claims that President Bush has “promoted” budget cuts against the so-called “critical” support for low income women. I don’t even know what that means…promoted? And if low-income women have enough time to have unprotected sex and get abortions, they have enough time to get a second job.

In their world it's Bush’s fault that people are poor and it’s Bush’s fault that “women have no choice but to get abortions”. This statement does not even address any real issue, it just uses misleading and illogical arguments to make it seem like the Democratic Party is capable of accepting more than one view on abortion. Because Harry Reid has a more acceptable opinion on the issue and Hillary Clinton supports the inhumane and barbaric practice of late-term abortion. But as we all know, most people on the left are intolerant of those that support any limitations on the so-called right of women to kill growing babies. In fact, groups like MoveOn actively oppose any person who does not completely adhere to their ideology, which includes this issue. So, if the Dems can pretend the left is tolerant of opposing views and can unite to blame Bush, then they can make it seem like they are an actual coherent political party capable of leading. We need a real debate; not a phony statement by two political hacks.

Iran: One Step Closer to the Bomb

(NY Times)Of all the claims that Iran made last week about its nuclear program, a one-sentence assertion by its president has provoked such surprise and concern among international nuclear inspectors they are planning to confront Tehran about it this week.
The assertion involves Iran's claim that even while it begins to enrich small amounts of uranium, it is pursuing a far more sophisticated way of making atomic fuel that American officials and inspectors say could speed Iran's path to developing a nuclear weapon.

Iran has consistently maintained that it abandoned work on this advanced technology, called the P-2 centrifuge, three years ago. Western analysts long suspected that Iran had a second, secret program— Then on Thursday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that Tehran was "presently conducting research" on the P-2 centrifuge, boasting that it would quadruple Iran's enrichment powers. The centrifuges are tall, thin machines that spin very fast to enrich, or concentrate, uranium's rare component, uranium 235, which can fuel nuclear reactors or atom bombs.


If this statement from Iran’s radical president holds any truth whatsoever, it means that Iran is expediting its quest to acquire nuclear weapons. If this action and the many others taken by Iran have yet to convince you of their intentions, then I implore you to take a step back for a minute. Dislodge yourself from the anti-Bush disease that has gripped you so tightly, and think of the consequences. War is not the advantageous solution to this problem but it happens to be the only realistic solution. I’m not quite sure how some people can think that Iran is simply after a peaceful energy program. Yet, sure enough, some have made that claim. It might be that their compulsion-of-hatred for America and or President Bush forces them to discount reality in order to quench that compulsion.

Perhaps the reasons behind their goal of WMD can be quibbled about but I am certain that the goal itself is not a point that requires argument. The aim of this country is to develop the weaponry that it feels it needs for one reason or another. As I mentioned before, there will be an attempt by some in the media and many people on the left to make the case for Iran to have the bomb. They will use the argument of “If we have nuclear weapons, why can’t Iran have them.” Then with that argument in place the media will start beating the drum of Iraq is a disaster, so war with Iran is impossible. The world community will also weigh in on the situation by downplaying the significant steps Iran has taken in its research and development phase of nuclear technology. The UN will do this because they are pacifists. The left-wing media will take this stance because they know that the more Iran threatens the United States and the more likely a U.S. strike is; means the fewer votes the Democrats are going to get in November and in the ’08 presidential election. The far-left here and abroad hate this country and our President and therefore they will fight hard to paint America as the bad guy.

Think about this: The United States receives more vitriolic criticism than Iran and North Korea combined. Two of the world’s worst dictatorships get criticized less than America. That is the extent to which liberalism/communism/socialism is willing to go. That hatred is what drives people to root for the country of Iran over the United States and that is what drives some people in America, including politicians, to hope we loose the war in Iraq. So, be mindful of the people who will attempt to paint us as the country to blame. Not only will they say America is the reason why Iran wants to acquire nukes but they will actively support our enemy in their quest to kill Americans. Keep in mind that Iran has aided in the deaths of American servicemen and women fighting in Iraq. Hundreds if not a thousand soldiers have been killed by terrorists financed by Iran and with weapons provided by that country. To most Americans, that is reason enough to strike but that will be completely ignored by many liberals. Because killing Americans is perfectly fine with them…but George Bush striking Iran is totally unacceptable. In fact, you have seen how the left hates the United States for simply planning an air strike. For them, killing Americans is OK but simply planning to stop them from developing the weapons it wishes to use against the United States is bad. It's Iran and the far-left vs America.

Dear Reality, Wake the Left up

-Iran refuses diplomacy: Houses top Al Qaeda leaders.
-Iran refuses peace:
They refuse Russian compromise.
-Iran defies diplomacy:
Breaks IAEA seals.
-Iran defies diplomacy: Iran given 30 days to suspend enrichment.
-Iran refuses diplomacy:
Enriches Uranium.
-Iran refuses diplomacy:
Tests secret weapons.
-Iran refuses diplomacy:
Vows to continue WMD program.
-Iran refuses diplomacy:
40,000 suicide bombers ready to kill Americans.
-Iran refuses diplomacy:
Claims Israel will be annihilated by nuclear blast.
-Iran refuses diplomacy:
Calls for Israel to be wiped off the map .
-Iran, one step closer: Iran is working on a P-2 centrifuge .

"A nuclear armed Iran is an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and our allies in the region.” –John Kerry-

Memo to those who think diplomacy and negotiation is plausible with a country that is unwilling to negotiate and refuses diplomacy: It does not work, it will not work and it’s impossible. Whose side are you on?

Bush is Turning into a Damn Democrat

When we think of the Democratic Party what do we think of? We think incompetence, political opportunists and complete hacks. We think, undermining the war on terror, anti-American and hypocrite. But what I’m referring to in this case, and has me most concerned, is The Dems have a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot and do things that are so moronic it causes people on the fence to shy away from voting for them. In this regard and perhaps in the incompetence regard, President Bush is turning into a Democrat. With that being said Bush should fire Mr. Rumsfeld or he should have him resign.

On Friday, Mr. Bush issued a strong statement of support for the current Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld. In that statement the President praised the secretary for his steadfast and energetic leadership. This comes directly after several former military generals have called for him to be fired. Mr. Bush said, "I have seen first-hand how Don relies upon our military commanders in the field and at the Pentagon to make decisions about how best to complete these missions. Secretary Rumsfeld's energetic and steady leadership is exactly what is needed at this critical period. He has my full support and deepest appreciation." [article] Did I read that correctly? His leadership is needed for this critical period…I don’t think so. In fact, I would argue that his “leadership” has worsened our country and has failed in this critical period. Don’t piss on my leg and tell me its raining señor president. This is beyond unbelievable and I’ll tell you something. If the Democrats were smart enough, which they are not, they would censure President Bush for his failure to fire Mr. Rumsfeld. And if they did that I would support it 100%. But the left is too busy aiding our enemies to care about the real problems that need to be addressed.

This moronic statement comes directly after several other Democrat-like moves from the administration. First, we had the Dubai Ports debacle in which the President fought against the American people and pushed for that obvious disaster. That port deal and the Administration's handling of it will cost us dearly in November and will aid in the Democrats quest to regain the White House…God help us. Then the President fails to show any conviction over the border situation this country is currently facing. We are being invaded by illegal aliens and he is supportive of amnesty! Not only is the flood of illegal immigrants damaging our country but the southern border, indeed both borders, have become a national security risk. While the Democrats are pandering to the illegal vote the GOP is turning into a bunch of scarred dogs, ducking away with their tails between their legs. Mark my words: If this continues the Democratic Party, with their terrorist sympathizing and their dreadful policies, will come to power.

Swallow your pride and demand the Secretary of Defense be fired for his obvious incompetence; The Incompetence that has needlessly attributed to the deaths of American servicemen and women and has turned Iraq into a disaster. Let me put it this way, do you really trust Donald Rumsfeld to plan the inevitable war with Iran? I don’t and for good reason. I was one of the
first Republicans to call for the firing of the Secretary and I still stick by that request. My loyalty is to my country first not any political party so I have no reservations about saying this. Donald Rumsfeld has hurt this country; continues to hurt this country and refuses to stop hurting this country. Not only is dumping Rummy the right thing to do because he refuses to correct the failed strategy in Iraq, but because failing to do so will cost us in the elections. And do not discount what these generals are saying because some of it is the truth.

The Far-Left and Iran vs America

It has begun. As predicted, some on the far-left have taken sides in the debate over Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. It looks as if groups have already gathered to put pressure on the world community to allow Iran to gain Weapons of Mass Destruction. Code Pink has fabricated a petition that they hope their supporters will sign. They wrote a letter that was directed to Kofi Annan; The letter basically calls for the head of the UN to denounce the United States and to use diplomatic means to prevent the possible air strike. They claim war is illegal, the war in Iraq is illegal and blah, blah, blah, the same tired and false arguments that have already been disproved. Here is part of their letter; it shows their deranged mindset:

To the Honorable Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations

We are appalled that the United States is threatening a military strike against Iran, possibly using nuclear weapons. As you are well aware, a preventive strike is illegal under international law, and the threat to use nuclear weapons against Iran, a non-nuclear weapons state, is a violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that the United States has signed. A nuclear strike against Iran would undermine the entire legal framework of disarmament and non-proliferation that so many millions of people around the world, and the United Nations itself, have worked so hard to build and protect.

Let's go through this letter so we can clearly see what Code Pink and others represent. The introduction says a lot don’t you think? “The honorable Kofi Annan” is the way they describe the man that has allowed genocide in Africa, that was complicit in propping up Saddam Hussein, and who allowed for the UN to steal money from the Iraqi poor. He has also done nothing about the UN members that rape underage African girls and he allowed for the worst human rights violators to sit on the UN Human rights commission…Very honorable in the mind of the left. Next, they are “appalled” that the United States is considering military action. So, they are not appalled at Iran seeking nuclear weapons while threatening to wipe Israel off the map? It seems their outrage is directed at the wrong country…but that’s typical. Their next argument states that a pre-emptive strike on Iran is illegal. But that is false and the fact is Iran has assisted Al Qaeda by providing money and weapons that have been used to kill Americans and American soldiers. Meaning, this is not pre-emptive, this technically is retaliatory… Sorry Code Pinko. Their next statement claims that a threat to use nuclear weapons against Iran is a violation of the NNPT. First, Iran has not been threatened with nuclear weapons. Secondly, Iran declared itself a nuclear country. So, as you can see, their arguments are completely fallacious which only proves that their anti-American and anti-military nature has caused them, as usual, to side with our enemies. And, in March, I pointed out how this group was actually advocating Iran be allowed to get WMD because it is unfair that other countries have them [
story]. Pro-Iran and anti-America…it doesn’t get any clearer than that.

The “unfair” argument will be the most prevalent among people on the left. I have already begun to see it pop up in the debate, especially at liberal websites. Watch for this, the argument will be: “If we [the United States] have nuclear weapons, why can’t Iran have them?” And make no mistake; some of these people actually feel it is a reasonable way to justify Iran getting the bomb. I have little doubt that some people in this country will start spewing this ridiculous line of reasoning and will once again prove their bias against the U.S and their support for our enemies. They just can’t help themselves. By the way, the MSM will also start taking sides in this issue and believe me when I say they will not be on our side.

Clinton Awarded for International Understanding

One of the worst presidents in history garnered another award yesterday; an award that honored his “international understanding.” Yes, you read correct, his understanding. Don’t ask me what that means because it is too far away from rational to be serious. Unfortunately however, it is serious and it only highlights the fact that we live in the Twilight Zone. Must I point out how much Bill Clinton did not understand nor care about the most important issues of our time? [Stopping and preventing terrorism] Yes, he did care about young interns and his self-image but is that really enough to earn an award? OK, I get it…he’s an incompetent pacifist that allowed North Korea to acquire nuclear weapons, because in his great understanding, he realized that if you just have faith in the word of dictators like Kim Jong-Il, everything works out just great. Also, his utter failure to recognize the seriousness of Al Qaeda after they attacked the United States on half a dozen occasions... that was great understanding. Look how well that worked out. Or perhaps they are awarding his knowledge of the law, specifically perjury. Maybe, just maybe, it’s a honoring of his lifetime achievements in the realm of politics; his unabashed lies mixed with the sickening display of pure political opportunism…yeah, that must be it.

Allow me to explain something to those unfamiliar with how the “world community” works. Whenever an award is given out by a group or an organization, especially a peace organization, using the phrase “international understanding” that means only one thing. Say it with me: Appeasement. What reality-based individuals call, “timidness at the expense of the nation”. When a leader, say for example, Bill Clinton refuses to act after an enemy kills Americans on many occasions... that represents “peace” in their minds. Peace, to these people [the world community] is measured by one thing; the use of the American military. To these types of people the barbarity of terrorism and dictatorship is very much acceptable but when the “evil” America uses force to stop the “peace” that is in actuality genocide…it’s unacceptable. What if I was to tell you that the head of the most corrupt organization on the planet was also given this exact same award? Well, it’s true. Kofi Annan, who was complicit in propping up Saddam Hussein and knew about the rape of the Iraqi poor by members of the UN, was also given the “International Understanding” award. Not only has he been given this but he was also given a Nobel Prize. Hey, look at it this way…all you have to do to win the peace prize is allow for genocide in Africa, steal money from the poor people of Iraq and allow the worst human rights violators to run the UN’s human rights organization.

This is about one thing and one thing only. Bashing America and supporting any counter-weight that aids in the bashing of American policy. Because while all of this terrorist sympathizing is going on…there is no room for freeing people is there? There is one similarity that is most often seen in the characteristic of the so-called peace or understanding awards. That characteristic is, of course, being anti-American. But being a terrorist appeaser/sympathizer is also smiled upon. Listen to the “great” words that the former president gave at the ceremony. "We should still have a preference for peace over war, a preference for cooperation over unilateralism, a preference for investing more to build a world with more partners and fewer terrorists." Wow! Hey, it’s not that these people are anti-American it’s that there are complete morons. Thanks Billy Boy I’m sure those profound and PHONY words mean a lot to the people who feel it necessary to bypass your utter failures to make a partisan and idiotic condemnation of the current administration. You know what this is? This is the real life version of the show The West Wing. Last Sunday, in the highly anticipated show, they had the Democratic candidate winning the presidential election. They couldn’t even bring themselves to face reality. In fact, in the show, which I watched, they had the electoral count reversed from the ’04 election. They had the Democrat win by the same electoral margin Bush won…it was sad. And that is basically what these phony awards are for…to make the “world community” feel better about themselves; Which is even sadder.

Kennedy: No Wind For You!

It looks like Senator Kennedy’s quest against clean energy has been echoed by the Nantucket voters. "In a nonbinding referendum yesterday, 66 percent of Nantucket voters opposed the construction of a wind farm in waters near the island" [story]. It is known as the Cape Wind Project and it was hoped that a substantial amount of energy could be gained from the cleanest energy source on earth. "Cape Wind is a proposal for America’s first offshore wind farm to be located on Horseshoe Shoal in Nantucket Sound. Cape Wind will provide three-quarters of the electricity used on Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket in average conditions. Cape Wind will contribute toward cleaner air, reduced regional greenhouse gas emissions, new jobs, lower electricity prices and reduced dependence on foreign energy sources." [CWP] And Not only was this project opposed by Senator Ted Kennedy but it was also opposed by the outspoken environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr.

You might be wondering why Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Senator Kennedy, who claim to be for the environment, are adamantly opposed to providing clean energy using wind. Well, the answer is quite simple and very typical. It just so happens that they are for clean energy as long as that clean energy does not interfere with their vacation and summer homes. Homes that are located in the area in which the Cape Wind Project was supposed to be located. By the way, this project is supported by many leading environmental groups and scientists. But like most hypocrites the Kennedys have one set of values they wish to enforce on other people but don’t want enforced on them. It’s called being a liberal. I wonder, could it be that Teddy is not really for the environment but is simply pretending so he can use it as political fotter to attack his opponents? I think so. Because clean energy is great and all…as long as it doesn’t mess with my yachts. Global Warming is bad…but to interfere with my sailing time, now that’s just wrong.

I’ll let you in on another little secret of the liberal senator from Massachusetts. You know how he has called for tax hikes on the rich. And how he claims President Bush is helping the rich get richer while the poor get poorer. The Truth is that Senator Kennedy has a large sum of his wealth located in offshore banks. He does this so he can avoid paying the heavy taxes that he wants other people to pay. It's not very consistent if you ask me.

Iran Calls on their U.S. Brothers

A Message From Inside Iran:

"I'm from Iran and let me tel you unfortunately many people here wish their U.S. brothers come to Iran the soonest possible. They think the U.S. will employ ground forces and I'm sure they're all wrong. I think the best way to get rid of this savaged regime and it's foolish Mullas is to strike them with Smart bombs. Then they would have no cabability to respond.

On the other hand, do you know why the regime insist on enriching uranium? Many poeple here in Iran think that the regiem itself wants an attack against Iran in order to blame the U.S. or any coalliton forces for their faliure to make jobs, promot the economy, social problems and etc. And I do believe they're right.

This fucking regime is very clever, don't understimate them. They're very good at propaganda. Last week, there was a program at the BBC World entitled, "Doha Debate", runned by Jim Sepastian. The topic was how many people are against Iran with nuclear power and how many are in it! You can't believe that the majority of participants agreed Iran to have nuclear power cababilities. They argued that Iran just has a civil purpose. I just mentioned this story to inform you that Iranian regime is working on the minds of poeple. So hurry up.


I can't write my name cos everything here in Iran is monitered by the regime. I'm sorry. But I'll try to inform my American friends about what the hell is going on here in Tehran. BTW, I forget to tell you that at least 70% of Iranians are Pro-Americans."

--This message was left with no name in my comment section this morning and I know it comes from the Islamic Republic of Iran. My stat counter picked it up but I will not provide any information because it could possibly endanger the person who left the comment.--

Nuclear Iran, Tactical Nuclear Strikes

It Just Got Serious People: Strike Iran and Do it Now! **Iran enriched Uranium**
Seymour Hersh wrote, “The Bush Administration, while publicly advocating diplomacy in order to stop Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon, has increased clandestine activities inside Iran and intensified planning for a possible major air attack. Current and former American military and intelligence officials said that Air Force planning groups are drawing up lists of targets, and teams of American combat troops have been ordered into Iran, under cover, to collect targeting data and to establish contact with anti-government ethnic-minority groups. The officials say that President Bush is determined to deny the Iranian regime the opportunity to begin a pilot program, planned for this spring, to enrich uranium.” He also broke a story that has some people across the country and indeed the world wondering what will happen. It turns out, according to Hersh, that President Bush and his military planners are considering a tactical nuclear strike against Iranian targets. Don’t confuse that with an all out nuclear strike; this would be a tactical weapon know as the nuclear bunker-buster. It is designed to penetrate deep into the earth’s surface and explode underground. The main focus in this weapon is its ground shock capability. Iran has hardened some if its key weapons facilities deep underground in the event of American air assault. Not only do they have bunkers for their weapons facilities but they have recently undergone efforts to fortify their command and control apparatus [sotry]. These bunkers are designed to withstand a conventional air strike and the conventional weaponry of the United States Military. Therefore the consideration of these nuclear bunker-busters is on the table…at least according to Hersh.

Frankly, while many people of a certain political party are outraged at the very thought of using this type of weapon, I am 100% supportive of the consideration. However, at this time, I do feel that this story is a phony story. It is phony not in that he is lying; it is phony because the story was leaked to him for a purpose. You might have notice the saber-rattling coming out of Iran and their new weapons tests. Well, that is part of their propaganda effort just as the "unnamed source" in the Hersh story is a propaganda tool we are using. It's called plausible deniability. It is a way to send a message to Iran and at the same time a way to deny that message publicly. It's a propaganda war and as you have probably noticed we have been losing that war for some time now. If Iran knows the US is willing to take out their underground facilities with tactical nukes they know we are serious. Once Iran started to intimidate the world by revealing the secret weapons they say they have, the United States went right into saying, “hey, all the underwater missiles you test will be nothing compared to what will be unleashed on your command and control” However, it might be true. Like I said, I hope this option is given serious thought by the administration.

What exactly would this mean for the United States and the world community? We know the world community is corrupt and unwilling to do anything in terms of Iran. We know that when push comes to shove Europe, aside from the UK, will cut tail and run away from necessary confrontation. Luckily Britain has a Prime Minister that is not as weak as the people in his country wish him to be.

This is what is going to happen. Iran will not give up its WMD program and in fact, their former president, Hashemi Rafsanjani, has confessed that Iran has already successfully enriched uranium and developed nuclear fuel [
story]. This revelation highlights the subjective reality of the left and calls for the world to recognize the objective reality for a change. Believe it or not; this has come down to the end game. It’s up to you to choose what side you are on. I know many of you Bush-haters have trouble being on America’s side but now would be the time to stop your foolishness and partisanship. This problem is not going away and it will NOT be solved diplomatically. The question is this: Are you willing to allow Iran to acquire the nuclear weapons it so desperately seeks or will you support preventing that outcome by all acceptable means necessary. On one side there is Iran being a nuclear power, which is unacceptable, and on the other hand there is the unwanted but necessary action the U.S. must take. Unfortunately, in the middle is an Iranian civilian population that is more or less, pro-American. As of this moment, U.S. covert ops is connecting with anti-government elements in Iran and as long as the United States keeps collateral damage to a minimum the population, I think, is supportive of air strikes. And the point I think is most important is that nothing that might happen due to a U.S. led strike is as bad as Iran having nuclear weapons.
--I wrote this article right before the news broke on Iran. Since then, everything has changed. The strikes have now been proven necessary for the pacifists and now I support using all means to stop them...including tactical nuclear bunker strikes.--

Hannity was Threatened by McKinney Supporter

A Cynthia McKinney supporter threatened Sean Hannity a few minutes ago with what seemed like physical violence. This happened on the Fox News show Hannity & Colmes. After the supporter claimed that McKinney was a victim of racism [shocker huh] he went on to say that he wished Sean was there so they could meet one on one. His disdain was quite evident. It was an obvious threat and when put out, Sean Hannity said, “Why, what are going to do.” The supporter then went on to threaten Sean again and when he realized he was on national TV he started to slowly back off saying, that if Sean was there Cynthia McKinney would run circles around him. Details to Come on this…

...Update, 8:40pm
I sent an email to ETL and thankfully he posted the video.

Hashim Nzinga was the supporter of Cynthia McKinney and this is what he had to say to Sean Hannity. “You better not ever run. I can’t wait ‘till I get to New York. Me and you need to be one and one [laughs cynically]." In this same interview Hashim claimed that Bush has targeted McKinney…for what I don’t know. I guess it’s all Bush’s fault again. “The woman is targeted by Bush and all the way down in Washington…she’s targeted and she’s striking out.” [Yeah, literally striking officers] Also, notice how the liberal Alan Colmes makes excuses and defends McKinney's actions.
WMV or MP4 video of incident via ETL

Democrats Pander to Illegal Immigrants

The Democrats have hit a new low today. Like with their attempts to garner the ex-con vote they are now going after the pro-illegal immigrant vote as seen with this flyer found in Dallas at the immigration protest site. Quick Reference on the con vote: The Democrats have figured out that the majority of felons tend to vote their way politically and why wouldn’t they? If I were a criminal, especially a rapist, I would vote for liberals in a heartbeat. If I were a criminal, the more liberals I help to put into office means the less time I spend in jail. You might remember the Democrats complain after the 2004 presidential election in which President Bush demolished their candidate. Well, after they got done complaining about the election results on the news, they complained in the senate. In an attempt to discredit the election the Democrats came up with the Count Every Vote Act. The Act was designed to give, among other things, ex-cons the right to vote starting in the year 2006. It’s funny because they ignore middle-America and values voters to go after the vote of rapists and illegal immigrants…

On to the current issue of passing out flyers at these rallies; I suppose it is not surprising to see their party out in force recruiting at these events. When you think about it, it seems that these people and the Democrats have a lot in common. [picture] Or maybe the upside-down American flag brings back some memories for John Kerry. [picture] It’s amazing to me to see how far this party will go in their quest to regain power. What message are they trying to send to these protesters? Harry Reid recently killed the bill that was designed to strengthen the southern border and provide some regulation of illegal immigrants. And now the Democratic Party is passing out flyers to illegal aliens and Mexicans that say “make sure your voices are heard, vote Democrat.” Does that mean we can count on the democrats to refuse to secure the borders and to assure illegal aliens that if you vote Democratic, they will choose not to enforce our laws? I think that is why they are doing this. The democrats are once again selling out America for a short term political gain.


This has become a pattern for their party. Everything the democrats do is for political reasons and those reasons happen to hurt our country. Think about it. The Democrats want to satisfy their far-left owners so they oppose the Patriot Act, they oppose tracking terrorists, and they use people like Al Gore and others to slander the president. They whine about impeachment and our desperately trying to censure Mr. Bush. They out CIA secrets that endanger our country and they slandered Justice Roberts while they lie with every breath. If only mainstream Democrats knew what their party leaders represented…Remember to vote Republican in November. We are not going allow murderers and child molesters to vote and we are not going to allow the democrats to open our borders up to an all out flood of illegal aliens.

Their Theories of Mass Delusion

Lately, some people have been entertaining the idea that President Bush knew about 9/11 beforehand and refused to do anything about it. There happens to be two branches of this argument: the first is a somewhat legitimate belief that the Administration was provided a memo having to do with Bin Laden and his determination to attack within the United States. The second argument is the conspiracy theorist belief that Bush and or the government was privy to the actual details of the plot and possibly assisted in the execution of that plot. I will preface the following paragraphs by stating that President Bush and the Administration were, in no way, part of or responsible for the attacks of September 11th 2001.

There is a legitimate argument, at least in the mind of some democrats, that since the President was provided a memo stating, Bin Laden determined to attack in the United States, he somehow holds responsibility for the attacks. However, as any fair-minded person will acknowledge, the President most responsible for the attacks of 9/11 is, without a doubt, Bill Clinton [
His failures led to 9-11]. With that obvious truth out of the way we can move to why some people think one memo about Bin Laden is a reason to blame the current administration for others failures. For a moment I will take their argument seriously and examine what the outcome would have been if prior to 9/11 Bush acted on that memo. To examine what might have happened in that case we first have to look to the present.

Democrats do not support efficiently tracking terrorists through the NSA’s terrorist surveillance program. Democrats do not support the Patriot Act in any of its forms. The Democrats do not support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive war nor do they support violating a brutal dictators sovereignty; According to Dems arguments, since Iraq was technically a sovereign country that gave Hussein the right to commit genocide. And they vehemently oppose the necessary terrorist-fighting method of racial profiling. Given that reality, what would the Democrats have supported in terms of the war on terrorism prior to the actual events of September 11th. They hate the necessary modifications in U.S. policy today and we are at war. So, if the President acted on this memo, what actions would the Democrats have supported? No surveillance, no pre-emptive strikes on Afghanistan; because we know that the left would not support taking out terrorists if there is a possibility of collateral damage…so that’s out. What about profiling Arab males in Airports throughout the country…Nope! Not something the democrats would have supported. So what prey tell should have been done in regards to this memo? Should the President have pushed for a type of Patriot Act that would allow more leeway in combating terrorism? If he did that it would have been filibustered by the opposition party. Should he have launched a pre-emptive war in Afghanistan on the basis of a memo? Or perhaps the CIA should have used more “illegal” means in their counter terrorism methodology? We all know how unrealistic the left is when it comes to covert operations and coercive interrogation. And that leads me to the question that I asked a couple of weeks ago that the left refused to directly answer. Would you have supported, knowing what we know now, the interrogation tactic of torture or coercive interrogation to extract information from Zacarias Moussaoui, who knew the actual detail of the 9/11 plot? I would. I hear the constant nay saying and the lack of ideas from Democrats and frankly it’s tiresome. It’s time to wake up and stop pretending that you would have supported realisitc action on the basis of that memo.

Moving on to the conspiracy theory that has Bush or members of his Administration being involved in the plot or execution of 9/11. Occasionally a nutter comes by and posts a comment claiming that the planes used on that day were equipped with bombs or missiles. Or that the twin towers collapsed due to precision explosives placed inside the towers. The people who believe this nonsense happen to be lean left politically…not really a surprise huh? Anyway, their claim is that Bush and the Bin Laden family were in cahoots and they planned the attacks for reasons only known to them. And then of course we have the theory that Bush planned the attacks on 9/11 for oil. They think that Bush used 9/11 so he could go to war in Iraq and steal their oil and to also enrich Halliburton. I like to call these people the Bill Maher audience or the Daily Show audience. Believe me when I say that there are a lot more of these nuts than people think. Anyway, let’s review their theories of mass delusion. First, it makes no sense that the Government would orchestrate the terrorist attacks of 9/11. If that was the case why would the government attack not only a huge economic center but the Pentagon? The plot consisted of attacks on major centers including the White House. I doubt the government would attack themselves. Lol. Moving on to the theory that explosives were used to bring down the towers. I’m not an engineering expert but that theory is impossible. Precision explosives need wiring and firing mechanisms and of course the explosive itself. We know that the fires inside the buildings were so intense that they actually melted steel wrapped in fireproofing. That means that if there happened to be explosives and wiring it would have melted them as well. The explosive theory would also suggest that the government worked hand in hand with Al Qaeda to execute the strikes. As for the explosives on the wings of the planes…those are engines. In any case, I hope that helps.

CNN Lied: Said Bush Leaked Plame’s Name

On Thursday CNN falsely reported that President Bush approved the leaking of Valerie Plame’s name in retaliation against her husband Joseph Wilson. [NewsMax](CNN) "A major story breaking now out of Washington. According to court papers that were filed by prosecutors, I. Lewis Libby, who was a key man in the office of Vice President Dick Cheney, has alleged that U.S. President George W. Bush was the man who authorized the leaking of the name of a CIA operative and the wife of a former ambassador.” Woops! Those documents do not say anything about George Bush approving Lewis Libby to out Valerie Plame. in fact the documents actually state the opposite. [FNC]"In his court filing, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald asserted that the president was unaware of the role that Libby had in fact played in disclosing Plame's CIA status." There is the truth and there is the hope. CNN hoped that Bush was responsible for the leak of Plame’s CIA status and the truth is that he was unaware of the leak. Of course CNN went with the hope and ignored the truth because of the obvious bias that their network has displayed on countless occasions.

It seems that the truth always manages to get in the way of the arguments put forth by Democrats. Not only does the President have the authority to declassify material but I am glad that the President did in this case. I’m glad he was not going to sit by while Joseph Wilson made up an assessment about Saddam Hussein seeking yellow cake from Africa. There is no way that Wilson could have acquired the information necessary to make the claim that he did in the New York Times. He wrote the piece to damage the Administration and because of that the President authorized the release of the National Intelligence Estimate which was the right thing to do. According to the NIE and to British Intelligence, Saddam Hussein did seek Uranium in Africa. I guess the question is why are the democrats so upset over this issue and why did CNN lie in an attempt to hurt President Bush? Why are they upset? Well, it’s because they are hypocrites. I have never seen the democrats complain about the left and the NY Times reveling in the outing of CIA secrets which endangered the military and the CIA. They get upset when Bush allegedly approves a leak of classified info, none of which had to do with Valerie Plame, but they’re content and supportive of the Times and others endangering the military for personal and political gain. Given that fact, it is evident that, in this case, they are displaying what is known as selective outrage. I happen to call phony outrage and it is a mainstay of the Democratic Party.


Will the left apologize for their support of disclosing information that hurts our country and puts the CIA and the military in danger? If that happens I will A) gain some respect for their party and B) I might take their arguments and outrage seriously. Plus, It would just be nice if they are able to acknowledge their hypocrisy and that it's wrong to wish harm on the military to attack the President. Anyway, the president approving the release of information is not that serious. Especially when compared to the leaks that Democrats have supported.

Update, 7:00pm. Bush Didn't Direct Libby to Leak.