War Vet Sues Michael Moore

An Iraq war vet has filed a lawsuit against the anti-American film-maker Michael Moore for doing what Michael Moore does; take events out of context and uses them as propaganda. (NY Post) A double-amputee Iraq-war vet is suing Michael Moore for $85 million, claiming the portly peacenik recycled an old interview and used it out of context to make him appear anti-war in "Fahrenheit 9/11."

Sgt. Peter Damon, 33, who strongly supports America's invasion of Iraq, said he never agreed to be in the 2004 movie, which trashes President Bush… "They took the clip because it was a gut-wrenching scene," Damon said yesterday. "They sandwiched it in. [Moore] was using me as ammunition."

Mr. Damon has appeared in the movie FarenHYPE 9/11 which details every lie that Moore uses in his fake documentary. And he is not the only person featured in Moore’s movie to come out and say they were taken out of context and that he manipulated scenes to make it seem like they were anti-war.

At this point there is no human being with at least half a brain that takes Michael Moore’s mockumentary seriously or respects the man as an individual. But of course, the far-left in America are not normal human beings but more like puppets being strung along by the mutual hatred they share with morons such as the film director. And I don’t doubt that some people, even after they read this, will still support him. They still support him despite Moore being one of the biggest hypocrites in this country. Not only does he constantly lie; but do you remember Halliburton? The company Moore hates and claims controls the Bush Adminisrtaion? Well, he owns stock in that company; in fact he owns 2000 shares of Halliburton. He also owns stock in the “evil war machine” Boeing and in the huge “evil” drug companies. -Story-

Yet, once again, I am forced to point out these types of stories. And like usual, it will be shrugged off by the opposition party. This is what the left does and will continue to do. They launch baseless and phony attacks that the media is more than happy to propagate and never corrects once the truth comes out.

Fox News and Dead White Girls

There is one thing that I hate about Fox News and that is how they obsess over dead white girls. It’s bad enough they report on Natalie Holloway every minute of every day but now they're all over this new murder of a college student who was strangled with her bikini top. Cute, white, strangled with a bikini…that's all Fox needs to spend weeks exploiting the story and to bring 50 experts in that say the same damn things over and over and over; milking the death of this girl for all its worth. I’m waiting for Greta van Sustren to do an entire hour on this story, pretending like she really cares or feels bad.

Fox has already called the killer the “bikini strangler” and is speculating on the countless possibilities of who, what, where, and why. They're also brining on the girl's friends to talk about the murdered college student. I’m hoping the killer is caught soon; not just to bring him to justice but to shut Fox News up.

What upsets me is that since Natalie Holloway disappeared, thousands of other people have been kidnapped or murdered and are missing, hoping someone would care enough to come save them. But no, you have to be of a certain persuasion for Greta or Fox to care.

A Beautiful girl who went to the university I currently attend was kidnapped, dragged to the desert, raped and then stabbed 30 times. She was missing for months and did anyone give a shit? No! Her last name was Martinez; which disqualified her, like thousands of others, from being “newsworthy”.

Oh, That Memorial Day Hatred

On this Memorial Day I leave you with the words of wisdom hatred from our pals at the Daily Kos. This must be that tolerance and keen intellectualism we hear liberals boast about so much…

Today is an important day for each and everyone of us. Our ability to sit at a computer and snark is due to the sacrifice of every man and woman who has put on the uniform of the US Military. Yes, I am a liberal and...

Jeers to YOU FUCKING ASSMUNCH RETHUGLICANS and Joe Liebermanesqe Democrats YOU do not own patriotism. I hate everything that have done to my country, with every ounce of my being.

YOU are the ones who do not support the soldiers. They do not fight for your ideas, they fight for one another. So while you are swilling down you Pabst Blue Ribbon, spilling it on your Dale Ernhardt shirt, screaming USA USA, kissing your brother or sister, another one of my brothers or sisters goes on to their final reward.
YOU are the ones who put in an administration that makes wounded service personal actually pay for the damage to their equipment.
YOU are the ones who put in an administration that refused to do anything, despite being warned, about September 11th. [Sorry, this is me laughing at that]
YOU are the ones who put in an administration that cuts veteran's benefits due to the lack of funds; but can cut taxes for the wealthy who never served anyone but themselves.
YOU are the ones who put in an administration that uses the constitution for toilet paper.
YOU are the fucking homophobes that have cost the service qualified linguists, putting everyone's life, including my daughter's in danger. [Laughing again]
YOU are the idiots who think a ribbon on your car makes you a good Merikin.
YOU are the uptight, micro phalliced, mouth breathers who think a consensual blow job is worse than the treason committed by your dear decider's administration.
YOU are the ones that put in this administration to protect us and what is the FBI doing? Digging up a farm in MI. I hope the find a few terrorist there. I bet Jimmy Hoffa is laughing at you.
YOU are the fools who ruined this country.

Win…But Not by Too Much

(Kansascity.com) --High school football coaches in Connecticut will have to be on their best sportsmanship — or risk suspension starting next year.

The football committee of the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which governs high school sports, is adopting a “score management” policy that will suspend coaches whose teams win by more than 50 points. It will be considered an unsportsmanlike infraction and result in a one-game suspension.

“We were concerned with any coach running up the game,” said Tony Mosa, assistant executive director of the conference. “There’s no need for it.”--

It seems that liberalism/wussiness has infected even our great American sports. And that’s not all; they also want to outlaw dodgeball, running, swing sets, merry-go-rounds, and teeter-totters for God’s sake. -

Have you ever seen Demolition Man? I think deep down they want to create the
San Angeles society as seen in that movie. Where everything deemed bad or potentially harmful is outlawed such as profanity (verbal morality code) and fatty foods. All of this in the name of a more “advanced and pleasant society”.

Has CNN Lied Again?

CNN, the cable news network that tired to embarrass Bush, flashed subliminal Xs over Cheney’s face, Insinuated George Bush colluded with Osama Bin Laden to time the release of his video and audio tapes and lied about Bush ordering the leak of Valerie Plame's name- seems to be at it again.

On Friday CNN ran a story with this as their headline:
Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program. And they wrote this in the body of the article: Iran has a right to develop nuclear technology and the international community should drop its demands that Tehran prove it's not trying to build a nuclear weapon, Iraq's foreign minister said Friday.

"Iran doesn't claim that they want to obtain a nuclear weapon or a nuclear bomb, so there is no need that we ask them for any guarantee now," Hoshyar Zebari said after meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki.

However, Iraq The Model reports that CNN misinterpreted or perhaps misrepresented what Iraq’s foreign minister actually said.

(ITM) I wasn't there at the press conference but I was able to find an audio clip of the same part of minister Zibari's statement through Radio Sawa, and what he said here is so much different from what the CNN claimed he did (my translation):

We respect Iran's and every other nation's right to pursue nuclear technology for research purposes and peaceful use given they accept [giving] the internationally required guarantees that this will not lead to an armament race in the region…Audio clip
available here (Arabic)

Listening to the 2nd version of the story (in Zibari's own voice) it is clear that Iraq recognizes Iran's right to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes exclusively and is moreover asking Iran for guarantees, not the other way around CNN!

So, was this another slimy attempt to undermine the war in Iraq or was it a simple error on the part of CNN? I think they wanted to use the Foreign Minister's statements as something to point to and say, "you see, Iraq thinks Iran should have nukes; is that what we are fighting for"? It's a way for CNN to kill two birds with one stone: it props up Iran and undermines the Iraq war...

Cross-posted at The Intelligence Report

Haditha and Its Exploitation

A group of U.S. Marines is under investigation for the possible slaughter of two dozen Iraqi civilians in the city of Haditha. (The Guardian) “In the Marine Corps, they are quietly calling it their My Lai, the massacre of hundreds of villagers in 1968 that became a symbol for American brutality in the Vietnam War. In this generation's war, the village is Haditha, north-west of Baghdad, where US marines killed two dozen Iraqi civilians, including 11 women and children.

In what is being viewed as the gravest allegation to date of war crimes in Iraq, a military investigation is expected to present findings in Baghdad next week that a small group of troops shot dead 24 unarmed Iraqi civilians, including five men in a taxi, and women and children at homes in the town last November 19.”…This was a massacre," said John Sifton of Human Rights Watch. "If these allegations are borne out, this will be the most serious war crime that has taken place in Iraq."
[Notice that little slip from the Guardian and the Human rights group. So are they saying that the terrorist-insurgents, who kill dozens of innocent people nearly everyday, are not committing war crimes? And if so, doesn’t that mean they have solidified the argument that terrorists do not have the luxury of Geneva Convention protections. Because if the human rights community doesn’t consider terrorists to be war criminals then their argument for them to have Geneva protections is destroyed.] –Damn I’m good-

If this story is true then there is no question these individuals should be prosecuted for their war crimes and the murder of the 24 civilians. However, I’m going to focus on what this means politically and how it will be used.

This incident is the best news in three years for the Democratic Party and count on them to exploit it. This story will be used in two ways by the media and the political left in this country and in Europe. As you can obviously see, in the first sentence of the Guardian article that I posted, the comparison to the My Lai massacre is in full force. And the Guardian blatantly lied to get a chance to make that comparison. They said, “The Marine Corp is quietly calling it their My Lai”. But that’s not true; the Guardian just made that up. And the reason they, and others, are going to use the My Lai Massacre comparison, is to further their own efforts to make Iraq the new Vietnam. That has been the media’s goal since day one; in fact the MSM and some Democrats like Ted Kennedy called Afghanistan a quagmire and called it the next Vietnam. So, in the following weeks, look for the My Lai reference to be used to describe the incident in Iraq.

The second way this story will be used is, of course, to attack President Bush. The attacks began last week when John Murtha claimed these Marines killed the innocent people in Haditha because of stress that goes all the way to the top (meaning it’s Bush’s fault for not cutting and running). Here’s the
video of the “Hardball” interview in which Murtha used these alleged killings to push his immediate withdrawal agenda. He also lied and claimed this incident “should’ve been investigated” when it has been under investigation since it took place. And guess what reference Chris Matthews of MSNBC used to compare the Haditha killings to?

However, it’s my hope that we, as a country, can come together and provide each other support in our time of war. And it is my hope the opposition party will not use this horrible action as a launching ground to push their desperate agenda. But since that is unlikely to happen; I will leave my Democratic friends with this quote: “Yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50 calibre machine guns… which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions." –John Kerry-

The Intelligence Report

I have a new blog site up and running called The Intelligence Report. This site will provide you with information that is highly classified and information you cannot find at any other website on the internet. I have just broken a story about ABC News and their connections to Al Qaeda. And I'm just as truthful as MoveOn.org, Air America, and CBS. So you can trust my anonymous "sources". (that's sarcasm in case you didn't know)

Source: "Al Qaeda Bribed ABC"

Galloway: Killing Tony Blair “Justified”

My favorite leftist is back from his relatively long stint of not saying or doing something absolutely absurd. George Galloway, made famous by coming to Washington to face a senate committee investigating the Oil for Food Scandal, said today, when asked, that the assassination of Prime Minister Tony Blair would be morally justified. (Independent) "Yes, [the murder of Blair] would be morally justified. I am not calling for it - but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of 7/7. It would be entirely logical and explicable. And morally equivalent to ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq - as Blair did."

So where do I begin? First, I’ll start with a little background on the man who became a rock star among the fringe-left by praising terrorism and attacking the United States. This is a guy who described the suicide bombers in Iraq as Martyrs. He also denounced those Iraqis who join their country’s security forces as “collaborators”. Galloway then claimed the insurgents are the “defenders” of not only that country but the entire Arab people. "Therefore it can be said that the Iraqi resistance is not just defending Iraq. They are defending all the Arabs and they are defending all the people of the world from American hegemony." -

Mr. Galloway also took bribes from Saddam Hussein and was caught lying by the United States Senate when he testified in front of the commission investigating the “Oil for Food Scandal”. (
Guardian) "Galloway personally solicited and was granted oil allocations from the government of Iraq during the reign of Saddam Hussein."Galloway's wife, Dr Amineh Abu-Zayyad, received approximately $150,000 in connection with one of those oil allocations." Galloway's political campaign, the Mariam Appeal, received at least $446,000 in connection with the oil allocations granted to Galloway…”

And I can’t forget to mention this utterly hilarious video of the British MP. If you haven’t seen this…It's a must see.

OK, now that we have some background, I’ll address his latest madness. I am, by no means, surprised at this type of twisted logic. I’m not surprised because I have been reporting on Galloway for a year, going back to my first blog site. When he said that killing Tony Blair is equivalent to him ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq, one has to wonder, how on earth he came to that conclusion. Did I miss something? When did the Prime Minister or President Bush order the deaths of innocent people in Iraq? Obviously it’s a complete lie but that’s not to say it’s not an applauded lie. By that I mean there are enough people in Europe and unfortunately America that have no use for the truth and in fact revel in hearing statements such as the one above. To them the truth is like a contagion they will stop at nothing to avoid. The truth, to which they are in denial, prevents them from being who they truly are.

People such as George Galloway, including many of the liberal internet-folk, would undoubtedly cheer a suicide-bomb attempt on the prime minister. They would also joyously celebrate an assassination attempt on President Bush. And if he were murdered they would mark that day, in all of their hatred and ignorance, as the greatest liberal holiday in history. So when people describe the Galloway remark as "shocking", as Drudge did in his headline, it is an underestimation of the depths of some people's hatred.

Open Thread: Guantanamo Bay

I happen to feel that Guantanamo Bay is important in the war on terror because it allows the United States to detain captured terrorists who fall under the category of illegal enemy combatant. However, the UN and other organizations have called for its closure which begs the question, “what should be done with these detainees if Gitmo were to close?”

Amnesty Intl: U.S. “Lost Moral Authority”

The left-wing political activist group posing as a Human Rights watchdog has, once again, blamed the United States for the world’s problems. In a recent “report” Amnesty International said the US has lost its moral authority and in a blazingly ignorant fashion, claimed the only way to combat terrorism is to be nice to Al Qaeda instead of defending our right to exist. "The increasing brutality of terrorist and militant attacks is a "bitter reminder that the 'war on terror' is failing and will continue to fail until human rights and human security are given precedence over narrow national security interests."

Human security? That’s interesting because your bogus report made no mention of the fact that Islamic Extremists are brutally murdering hundreds of innocent people per month in Iraq alone. Given that you are so concerned about human rights, at least that’s what you say, it should seem that imprisoning terrorists in Guantanamo Bay is a distant second to killing people…at least if your real concern is human life and its preservation. However, on that issue, I doubt Amnesty International is really concerned because terrorists are not American and their leader is Osama Bin Laden not George Bush.

"There is no doubt that it (the war on terror) has given a new lease on life to old-fashioned repression," Irene Khan, Amnesty International's secretary general, told a news conference. (The United States) has basically mortgaged its moral authority on the streets of Fallujah and Baghdad -- and lost moral authority to speak on this issue," Khan told AP Television News in regard to Darfur.

“Old fashioned repression”? What is that; a reference to Nazi Germany? Or maybe to the UN’s favorite dictator, Saddam Hussein. Or perhaps she meant the actual repression that the N. Koreans are facing under the brutal tyrant Kim Jong-il. But I doubt it…'cause once again, real dictators and terrorists, who target and kill innocent people, don’t have a US flag patched to their shoulder. And we haven’t lost our moral authority; the world has lost its moral compass. The UN is the most corrupt institution on this planet and is rabidly anti-Semitic and anti-American. In fact the genocide in Darfur is a failure of the United Nations and any group that claims the war in Iraq has undermined the effort to stop the genocide is obviously lying. The only way to stop the crisis is to send in NATO troops led by the US. But if that happened we would be labeled warmongers and condemned.

This is my favorite line from A.I. "Guantanamo prison camp is an aberration under international law. And it sends a message to other regimes around the world -- like Egypt or China -- that they too can ignore human rights. They too can lock people up in the name of national security."

A) The United States is not a regime even though the lefty group wants to describe it that way. B) Egypt and China have and will continue to violate human rights with or without the existence of Guantanamo Bay. That ridiculous statement is just like the others we hear all the time from the left. The one that immediately comes to mind is the argument in which they claim that Al Qaeda would treat captured US soldiers with respect if not for the existence of Gtimo. It's crazy but that's what they think.

Anyway, It's not difficult to understand the mentality of groups like Amnesty International. Whatever the United States does is bad and whatever terrorists do is because of the US. Al Qaeda kills 50 people in a suicide blast; we hear no outrage. The US kills 50 terrorists in Afghanistan along with 16 innocent civilians being used as human shields; The US is condemned for the collateral damage, not those who used the human shields.

But I’m sure this so called report will be posted around the globe to fuel the anti-Americanism that has become the sport of the ungrateful world.

A Poll is a Poll is a Holy Shit!

This is almost funnier than Patrick Kennedy crashing his car and blaming it on prescription medication. I was cruising through some of the insane liberal blogs and found some polls put out by the Kos Clown.

First up we have Howard “scream machine” Dean. The question was, "Do you approve of the way Howard Dean is doing his job?” -

Approve: 88%
Disapprove: 8%

88% of the clown’s followers approved of the disaster that is Howard Dean…

Next we have a leadership poll for Harry Reid. "Do you approve of the way Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is doing his job?" -

67% Approve of the job he is doing
23% Disapprove

He also put up a Straw Poll asking his readers to vote for who they want as their Democratic Presidential nominee in ‘08. Amazingly, the person who is actively pushing for impeachment and the censure of the president was their top choice. [I’m only posting the top 4] -

Russ Feingold: 46%
Wesley Clark: 15%
Mark Warner: 10%
John Edwards: 7%

And I saved the best for last. Daily Kos also posted a fantasy Straw Poll in which he included, none other, than Al Gore to the list (it's a fantasy because gore has said he won't run). I would've assumed, given he is Al Gore, that nobody would want him as their nominee. But Kos's visitors are not normal people. I don’t even think they are people. -

Al Gore demolished the other potential candidates with 68% of the vote. Not only that, many of the comments called for an Al Gore, Russ Feingold ticket in 2008. All I can say to that is, DAMN these lefties are crazy. I also hope they get their wish…a Gore/Feingold ticket would ensure Republican victory.

So there you have it; The backwards world of the Democratic Base.

And You Thought We Were Kidding

I’m not going to write anything about this story; I’m simply going to post It for you to read. I’m afraid that if I start writing an article about the following I might become so enraged at the thought of pure hypocrisy, that I'll break my computer in half:

Investors.Com) In our brave new schools, Johnny can't say the pledge, but he can recite the Quran. Yup, the same court that found the phrase "under God" unconstitutional now endorses Islamic catechism in public school.

In a recent federal decision that got surprisingly little press, even from conservative talk radio, California's 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it's OK to put public-school kids through Muslim role-playing exercises, including:

Reciting aloud Muslim prayers that begin with "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful . . . ."

Memorizing the Muslim profession of faith: "Allah is the only true God and Muhammad is his messenger."

Chanting "Praise be to Allah" in response to teacher prompts.

Professing as "true" the Muslim belief that "The Holy Quran is God's word."

Giving up candy and TV to demonstrate Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of fasting.
Designing prayer rugs, taking an Arabic name and essentially "becoming a Muslim" for two full weeks.

Parents of seventh-graders, who after 9-11 were taught the pro-Islamic lessons as part of California's world history curriculum, sued under the First Amendment ban on religious establishment. They argued, reasonably, that the government was promoting Islam. But a federal judge appointed by President Clinton told them in so many words to get over it, that the state was merely teaching kids about another "culture."

So the parents appealed. Unfortunately, the most left-wing court in the land got their case. The 9th Circuit, which previously ruled in favor of an atheist who filed suit against the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, upheld the lower court ruling.

The decision is a major victory for the multiculturalists and Islamic apologists in California and across the country who've never met a culture or religion they didn't like — with the exception of Western civilization and Christianity. They are legally in the clear to indoctrinate kids into the "peaceful" and "tolerant" religion of Islam, while continuing to denigrate Judeo-Christian values.

Democrats Cry While Jefferson’s Bribed

Here is a little bit of that corruption we hear so much about from the Democratic Party. Unfortunately for them, it’s once again, not a Republican mired in scandal. (WAPO) Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), the target of a 14-month public corruption probe, was videotaped accepting $100,000 in $100 bills from a Northern Virginia investor who was wearing an FBI wire, according to a search warrant affidavit released yesterday.

Given that his name is not Tom Delay I expect little to no outrage over this $100,000 bribe that happens to be slightly (and by slightly, I mean a lot) more relevant than “conspiring to inject corporate contributions in a state election”. However, I am starting to agree with what the Democrats are claiming is the culture of corruption in Washington. It's true, Democrats are corrupt…so thanks for pointing that out Nancy Pelosi, you were absolutely right.

This is another incident of backfire for our pals with no moral compass. It’s like I said before, The Democratic campaign for the 2006 election is to attack the GOP by driving-home the phrase “Culture of Corruption”. But the reality of the situation is that they are just as crooked as the Republican Party and that fact keeps blocking their efforts. It’s funny because the Dems were touting what they labeled a “real security plan” while, at the exact same time, they were bypassing security and
punching cops. And while they were complaining about ethics in the senate, the head Democrat on the ethics committee stepped down amid corruption charges. And when they were attacking the President over the NSA wiretaps, the DSCC used political operatives to steal Michael Steele’s financial records without a warrant.

The opposition party is almost at the point of being truly sad. It reminds me of a monster movie. You know when the monster is done reeking havoc on the country and then gets harpooned to death and you feel some sympathy for the creature? Well, that’s how I feel about the Dems. They are a creature that is hell bent on destroying our country to regain power and they just keep getting harpooned…on second thought, it’s damn funny.

Dems Grant Illegals Social Security

The Senate voted yesterday to allow illegal aliens to collect Social Security benefits based on past illegal employment -- even if the job was obtained through forged or stolen documents. -Washington Times-

The vote was on the Ensign Amendment of the Immigration Reform Act. It was designed to prevent illegal aliens from receiving social security benefits. The amendment was defeated by the vote margin
50-49 with 45 democrats voting to kill it. In other words, Democrats want Middle America, not only to fit the bill of mass illegal immigration, but they want us to allow criminals to benefit from their criminality at the expense of the honest American and lawful immigrant. And Here’s a bit of backward logic from Vermont Democrat, Patrick Leahy who voted against the amendment. "We should not steal their funds or empty their Social Security accounts. That is not fair. It does not reward their hard work or their financial contributions. It violates the trust that underlies the Social Security Trust Fund."

Leahy said it violated the “trust” that underlies social security but the “trust” is that American Citizens have money for retirement, not illegals. If I were a Democrat I would wonder why it is my party opposes fixing Social Security while voting to allow illegal aliens to receive my benefits. Why are they putting at risk the retirement savings of Americans and spitting in the faces of those immigrants who have gone through the painstaking process of legal citizenship?

Guardian: Gitmo Attack was a “Protest”

Many people hear about the liberal or the anti-American media but most people, on the left, usually deny the existence of such a thing. However, here at Opinionnation Times I pride myself on pointing out examples of what I know is biased reporting. And today's example is one from the anti-Semitic and anti-American, Guardian Unlimited.

On Thursday night, a group of terrorist detainees at Guantanamo Bay attacked U.S. guards with weapons fashioned from various objects such as fan blades and metal piping. The detainees were able to launch this attack because one of them faked a suicide attempt while the others waited for the guards to come running in. Fortunately, the guards were able to subdue the attackers with non-lethal force and escaped any serious injury. This story has been widely reported but one article caught my attention. This is how the Guardian described a planned attempt to violently kill United States soldiers.

“The incident was the second organised protest by prisoners in less than a year, following last August's mass hunger strike; it was seen by human rights activists as a sign of growing despair among the prison's inmates”

I guess Al Qaeda suspects trying to kill Americans, according to this Euro-rag paper, is just your friendly “organized protest.” The newspaper also had the gall to mention that some human rights activists view this violent outburst as a sign of despair. The Guardian then tried to sympathize with their beloved Al Qaeda members while trying to demonize the United States. Instead of pointing out how the detainees are TERRORISTS and will kill innocent people if released, the article read as if the United Nation’s call for Gitmo to be closed was a legitimate request from a legitimate world body. -give it a read.

Liberal Idiots Mock McCain

John McCain, a bonafide American hero, was booed and heckled as he delivered a commencement address at the New School in New York City. It’s true; a bunch of pot-smoking liberal whiners turned their backs and booed an American veteran who spent five years in a Vietnamese torture camp. These snot-nosed students, who drive their daddy’s BMW, had the audacity to disrespect a person like senator McCain without hesitation. And what really made me mad was that a graduate student, some 90 lb. little girl, who also gave a speech at the commencement, said this about a grown man who fought in Vietnam, served his country and survived being a POW: “The senator does not reflect the views on which this university was founded. Not only this, but his invitation was a top-down decision that did not take into account the desires and interests of the student body.” Yeah, Some little twerp actually said that while Senator McCain was sitting right there. [ Real Player: Video] Update: ETL has CNN Video

I’m not even surprised these monkeys would do that. That’s what liberal-monkeys do…they live in a fairytale world where they honestly believe they are somehow special. I’ve met these types of people; I’ve had classes with them and they are dead set on being wrong. Liberalism has become nothing more than a sideshow in America. These people are nothing and they are upset because of that fact. They have no ideas; only hatred. They have no clues; only contempt. They are tiny things that wander the streets hoping someone will notice their self-professed intellect. “Hey, look at me, I turned my back on John McCain, I’m so special.”

This is how twisted liberal America is: They self-righteously attack President Bush and McCain for overthrowing a brutal dictator and they charge George Bush with being a war criminal. Yet who did they vote for and unconditionally support in the '04 election? John Kerry! The admitted war criminal who took part in free fire zones, raided villages, likely killing women and children. He also voted for and supported the pre-emptive invasion of Iraq. So which is it morons? You claim Bush lied prior to the invasion but you supported a candidate who said the exact same things; made the exact same charges. You call Bush a war criminal but you turned right around and voted for one in John Kerry. You claim to be tolerant yet your actions prove that you are the most intolerant trolls in the country.

Here’s an idea for those who would heckle John McCain and that dumb little girl who said the senator does not reflect the university’s founding. The next time you feel the need to express your idiocy just do us a favor and kill yourself. No one wants to hear your babble so keep your whiny little ingrate-mouth shut.

Democratic Donor; Data-Mining Reporter

Leslie Cauley, the USA Today reporter that broke the now highly contested story about the NSA’s data-mining program is a democratic donor. She also has connections to a former AT&T executive who contributed major money to the Democratic Party and who was even considered a candidate to be the head of the DNC, the job currently filled by Howard Dean.[ Newsbusters ]

This new revelation has sprung forth in the midst of vehement
denials from two of the three phone companies that Cauley calims assisted the NSA in its efforts to track suspected terrorists. The USA today story provided no evidence or direct sources and was released in sync with the nomination of Michael Hayden who, if confirmed, will be the next head of the CIA. The timing of the story, as I pointed out when it broke, seemed to be an effort to damage that nomination and to give Democrats ammunition to attack Hayden for his role in setting up the NSA program.

I’m not saying the reporter is lying, even though she might be. I’m simply pointing out a disturbing pattern that has recently emerged for us to see. It started with Joseph Wilson’s lies in the New York Times designed to damage the administration. He claimed, without evidence, that “yellow-cake” uranium was never sought by Saddam Hussein in Africa and he publicly attacked the Bush administration in an effort to discredit the War in Iraq. Then, of course, we had Mary McCarty. The proven Kerry contributor and former Clinton aid who illegally leaked the “black site” story to the Washington Post. That leak seriously damaged our national security and put at risk the lives of not only the CIA and the military but the American people. I can’t forget to mention the other CIA outing of terrorist plane routes that was leaked to the New York Times; that hurt the country as well. I also can’t forget the NY Times revealing the NSA Terrorist-Surveillance Program. And now we have another Democrat giving away our secrets to Al Qaeda in a political stunt to hurt the nomination of Michael Hayden.

All of these leaks and stories seem to be politically motivated and nearly all of them have been proven inaccurate or flat out false. It’s a trend that speaks to the lengths some in the media and the opposition party will go to wound the current Administration and to hurt the War on Terror.

The Re-Rise of the Third Reich

The Iranian Government has passed legislation that would require Jews and Christians to wear badges that identify their religion. Jews would be forced to wear a yellow stripe on their clothing and Christians would be forced to wear a red badge. It is said that this law will likely pass making Iran the new Nazi government. (Canada.Com) "Human rights groups are raising alarms over a new law passed by the Iranian parliament that would require the country's Jews and Christians to wear coloured badges to identify them and other religious minorities as non-Muslims.

The law, which must still be approved by Iran's "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenehi before being put into effect, also establishes special insignia to be worn by non-Muslims. Iran's roughly 25,000 Jews would have to sew a yellow strip of cloth on the front of their clothes, while Christians would wear red badges and Zoroastrians would be forced to wear blue cloth."

Well, I have no doubt that the Iranian regime has a deep seeded quest to annihilate the Jews and all westerners while actively building nuclear weapons. That obvious fact is only one of the problems facing the world. The other huge problem is the UN placing Iran on the Disarmament Commission while condemning the United States and undermining our national security. Not only that but the head of the IAEA wanted to reward Iran for violating their own enrichment agreement calling for Europe to provide incentives to persuade the regime to cease their nuclear activities; Incentives that they promptly rejected.

When will the “world community” wake up and realize what the hell is going on? Read the first quote that I posted from the Canada.com news article: it says “Human rights groups are raising alarms over the new law…” Oh, so now they decide to jump in. Iran is a dictatorship that houses Al Qaeda, supports terrorism, is building nuclear weapons, threatens to kill every Jew on the planet, but only after forcing non-Muslims to wear badges do these so called human rights groups “raise alarms”. You better decide whose side you're on because diplomacy has failed and I think you know what happened after Europe appeased Hitler the way they are currently appeasing Ahmadinejad. ***This is Hitler with nuclear weapons***

I’m waiting for the anti-American left and the United Nations to start making excuses for this new Nazi Law. If you’re a liberal and you’re reading this, what do you have to say now? How are you going to defend this one? Weapons-grade uranium was found and you made excuses. Iran refuses all diplomatic offers, you blame the United States. You deny Iran is building nuclear weapons but support their right to do so because you resent the fact that the US and Israel have them. You like to compare George Bush to Hitler yet surprisingly you sympathize with Saddam Hussein and now with Iran. So, I’m anxious to see what type of moronic excuse you have for this one. Please enlighten us.

God: "Pat Robertson is an Idiot"

The televangelist Pat Robertson has announced that God has directly spoken to him and warned that the United States will be hit by huge storms this year. He also claimed that God told him the U.S. may be hit by a tsunami.

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. -- The Rev. Pat Robertson says God has told him that storms and possibly a tsunami will hit America's coastline this year.

The founder of the Christian Broadcasting Network has told viewers of "The 700 Club" that the revelations came to him during his annual personal prayer retreat in January. "If I heard the Lord right about 2006, the coasts of America will be lashed by storms," Robertson said May 8.

…If you heard the Lord right? This guy has entered crazy town and the storms of insanity have wiped away all possible exits. Listen, if God tells you things then I’m Gandhi drunk at a bowling alley.

I don’t know which is worse: A guy duping his followers into thinking he talks to God, in order to steal their money, or actually believing he receives annual messages from him. Either way, I am tired of having to hear about some crazed religious nut telling me he is an ambassador to Heaven.

God told you a tsunami might hit the coast, huh? Yeah, well God told me he wants you to shut the hell up.

Oh, How They Love Our Troops

Troop-basher John Murtha was on Hardball last night condemning the Marines for what he claims was the My Lai Massacre redux. When asked by Chris Matthews to explain what happened in Haditha, an Iraqi city, Murtha responded, “Well, I’ll tell you exactly what happened. One Marine was killed and the Marines just said we’re going to take care – we don’t know who the enemy is, the pressure was too much on them, so they went into houses and they actually killed civilians.” [WMV or MP4 Video via ETL]

And when asked if this action was like My Lai Murtha said, “That’s exactly right.”

With that reference Murtha is saying US Marines, in Iraq, raped and tortured civilians, killed hundreds of women and children, dragged people to a ditch and executed them. He then tried to blame what he claimed is a massacre on President Bush instead of sympathizing with the Marines who are at WAR.

This type of rhetoric is not uncommon for liberals. You might remember the former democratic presidential nominee, John Kerry, said soldiers in Iraq terrorized women and children. “There is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children and women.”

And then there's this form our Democratic friends:

Charlie Rangel said the war in Iraq is as bad as the holocaust.
Dick Durbin likened our troops to the Nazis.
John Murtha said the US Army is Broken.
Dennis Kucinich insinuated we purposely bombed innocent civilians in Afghanistan.

Hey, at least we know where they stand...And remember, don't question their patriotism.

It’s About Damn Time!

The senate just voted to build 370 miles of fencing on the Mexican-American border. Along with the triple-layer fence the senate also voted in favor of building another 500 miles of brand new vehicle barriers. This is the first real step in the long battle against those who wish to uphold the constitution and those who desperately want illegal immigrants to have unfettered access to our country, our tax dollars and our benefits. Surprisingly, the vote was overwhelmingly in favor of building the wall with 86 yay votes and only 16 nays. However, some people were not too happy with the decision.

Leave it to Dick “our soldiers are Nazis” Durbin to complain about taking steps to secure the border. He claimed if this bill passed it would hurt our relationship with Mexico by creating a "barrier" between our two countries. Well, yeah Dick…literally. And I wouldn’t call the corrupt Mexican government, assisting in narcotics and illegal immigrant traffic, a great partner worthy of a relationship. Durbin also said that “What we have here has become a symbol for the right wing in American politics.” I know what he was trying to say but I think that statement only shows how his partisanship blinds him from common sense because what he basically said is that securing the border, enforcing the law, and being fair to legal immigrants is a symbol of the right-wing. While open-borders, amnesty, unfairness and breaking the law is the symbol of the left-wing.

Unfortunately, the President’s weak speech and his intention to use the National Guard only as a smokescreen rather than as a force to stop illegal immigration is a sign that he is not acting in the best interest of the country. I think Bush is trying to pull a John Kerry by pandering to every possible crowd and like Kerry he is doing so at the detriment of the nation. Luckily, even though it seems politically motivated, many Republicans are separating from el Presidente on this issue and have begun the necessary positioning to not only force the Democrats on board but George Bush as well. I’m interested to see how this works out but at the same time I'm tired of all this political maneuvering and anxious to see something done.

Busted! Report on Ward Churchill

A newly released Committee report from the University of Colorado at Boulder concluded that the radical professor Ward Churchill plagiarized material and committed other types of academic violations. "Based on the investigation of those allegations, the committee unanimously found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Professor Churchill committed several forms of academic misconduct as defined in the policy statements of the University of Colorado at Boulder and the university of Colorado system."

The allegations included misrepresentations and plagiarism. Unfortunately, only 3 out of the 5 committee members felt his academic misconduct warrants a revocation of tenure and dismissal. The other two members felt that his offenses did not meet the requirements for removal. However, this report could lead to his tenure being revoked and hopefully to his termination.

I’m expecting these findings will be brought up tomorrow night on the O’Reilly Factor given he played a key role in helping to expose the type of indoctrination used by professors such as Churchill. It seems all the heroes of the left have been debunked and exposed as frauds, idiots and America-haters: Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, George Galloway, Ward Churchill, Al Franken…it’s all sad really. Well, maybe it's more funny than sad. And We can only wait to see what the response will be from some of his supporters. Although, I'm assuming they still love the proven liar and leftist extraordinaire. Everybody has to have a role model, right?

Read the full pdf report
here or the summary here.

Liberalism Gone Mad!

Boulder Colorado is planning to institute an anti-bias hotline designed to allow for individuals to call-in if they have been “victimized” by racial slurs or offensive language. (Colorado Daily) “One of the three ideas would be to establish a pilot Anti-Bias Hotline - a bilingual phone service for people who believe they have been victimized because of their race, sexual orientation or other classifications. Hotline users would be able to talk anonymously, while hotline volunteers would in part be trained to offer referrals.”

I will start by using one of my favorite quotes of all time because I think it fits perfectly with this story. The quote is by Dennis Miller and it states, “Political correctness is inverted McCarthyism.”

I don’t know if people realize that there is something in this country called freedom of speech? Because that concept seems to be, at least in Boulder, secondary to making people feel better. Under the system, if you offend someone at some time that person can dial up this hotline and report you. The report will then be on record and the service could recommend that you be arrested or prosecuted. Because God-forbid the constitution get in the way of lifting the poor spirits of some whiny idiot. Not to mention anyone can report anonymously and claim anything they want about you…even if it’s not true.

This is insanity and because I hate the PC crowd I hope someone will be offended by the following shirt idea of mine:

Death to Political Correctness

Camel Jockey

…They all look the same to me

CNN Tries to Embarrass Bush

CNN cut to Bush practicing his immigration speech in an attempt to undermine the primetime address.

Wolf Blitzer claimed it was inadvertent…Yeah Right Wolfy. Just like the flashing Xs you posted in front of Cheney, during one of his speeches, was a "technical error". Blitzer blamed it on the network pool feed but it’s funny how no other station cut to the rehearsal except CNN.

WMV or MP4 Video via ETL

Smokescreen on the Border

President Bush will make a primetime address tonight in which he will announce a deployment of 5000 National Guardsmen to the southern border. I am for placing troops in that area to stem the overflow of illegal aliens that are coming into this country. However, it’s being reported that the Guard is not going to be actively securing the border but simply providing logistical support, construction and transportation duties. If they are not physically along side the Border Patrol then this is only a smokescreen to make it look like something is being done when in reality this helps nothing. If you are going to use the National Guard as a resource then do it in an effective way or don’t do it at all.

Although, I understand this will help Republicans in the fall elections and will put pressure on the congress to speed up legislation for the “comprehensive” border bill but that’s still not the primary issue. It’s a clever political move except I think more would be gained both politically and in security if the Guard was used to actually stop illegal immigrants. This whole thing is an attempt to satisfy the conservative base and it pisses me off because that means they think we are as dumb as the Democratic Party. Democrats believe anything they are told to believe and they fall for the stupidest political ploys. And for me, it’s very insulting to be put down to their level.

If the Guard is going to be used just for support and construction then why not have them build a wall while they’re out there? I don’t want to hear anymore BS from President Bush; just get the job done! Build a wall, put the military out there and protect this country! What is so hard to understand about the situation? The GOP is not going to lose votes, the economy is not going to collapse and the majority of Americans are in favor of protecting the border.

Update, Post Speech 6:30:
My overall opinion of the President’s speech is: Wishy Washy. Nothing in this speech gives me any confidence or indication that this Administration really cares or really wants to do anything about this issue. And as I pointed out, the National Guard will not perform any protective function whatsoever. It’s just window-dressing.

First of all, I don’t care if amnesty is given to every illegal immigrant currently in this country. No problem at all…as long as the border is completely secured today! I can live with 10-20 million illegals in this country; that shouldn’t even be an issue. All the anti-amnesty talk does is bog down the effort to secure our southern border. Stop the flood of illegal immigrants first and then worry about those currently in the country. Build a wall, increase the number of border patrol agents, use new technology, and have the National Guard immediately cut off the flow of immigrants. 6000 Guard troops cleaning toilets isn’t going to do anything.

ACLU used NSA-Like Data Collection

Wait…What! Don’t tell me! The ACLU had a data-mining system that accumulated information on individuals without their permission…No! Then that would mean their outrage over the NSA using data collection to track terrorists is purely political. Well I never would have thought the leftist outfit was capable of this type of hypocrisy. It’s almost like they have an agenda to undermine the war on terror and one against the United States.

San Francisco Chronicle, 2004) The American Civil Liberties Union is using sophisticated technology to collect a wide variety of information about its members and donors in a fund-raising effort that has ignited a bitter debate over its leaders' commitment to privacy rights.

When the NSA story broke in USA Today, something in the back of my mind kept trying to remember an article about how the American Civil Liberties Union once used this type of technology to fatten their bank roll. Sure enough it popped up in a search that I was doing and like a bolt of lightning hitting me in the head, there it was. And a member of their board likened their efforts to a simple Google search. That can’t be any further from them claiming the government, using this same technology to track down our enemy, is comparable to a dictatorship. So which is it? A Google search or a dictatorship...or maybe it's a Google search when the ACLU does it and a dictatorship when George Bush does it. I get it now, silly me.

By the way, the ACLU just started a
petition drive that demands the telephone companies stop assisting our fight against terrorism. The letter they sent out is completely inaccurate and is obviously a contradiction given their own program which went beyond just numbers and included names, financial records and addresses.

Are These People Stupid?

The "World Community", including Kofi Annan and many Democrats are now calling for the United States to hold direct one on one talks with the radical Iranian Regime. But who was it that deplored America’s “unilateralism”? Who was that? Oh yeah, they did! The same people who are now demanding we undercut the coalition that we have built against Iran are the same people who attacked our country for “going it alone” in Iraq. Not to mention that it took great work by the Bush Administration; I mean it took years to get the Europeans together to take some meaningful action. They want us to throw that to the curb because a psycho-leader wrote one meaningless letter right after he denied the holocaust, enriched uranium, threatened Israel with nuclear destruction, housed top al Qaeda leaders, and aided in the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq by providing the insurgents with weapons, money and intelligence. Are you fuckin’ kidding me! Listen, all Iran has to do is stop building nuclear weapons and allow full access to their nuclear facilities. That’s it! That’s all they have to do; it’s not that complicated.

Madeline Albright has been making the rounds on nearly every news show pushing the idea that we should hold one on one talks with the hard-line president. (
FNC) “Albright urged the United States to engage in direct talks with Iran, saying, ‘Rather than thinking it's a clash of civilizations, I think we are in a battle of ideas.’”

Is that so; we are in battle of ideas? What the hell is she talking about…battle of ideas, gimme a break. In case you haven’t noticed Iran has refused diplomacy, they’re enriching uranium while vowing not to stop, and they are building nuclear weapons which they will pass on to our enemies which will lead to the deaths of millions of people. That’s not a battle of ideas you idiot. Oh, and by the way, how did those unilateral talks with North Korea work out for you? How did Bill Clinton’s plan to negotiate with North Korea’s dictator work out, huh? Oh right…they currently have nuclear weapons and are building more. Great job! We will just follow your plan and keep pushing the issue off until Iran gets the bomb and people die.

"The Decider"

I was going to post something on this when it first came out but more pressing stories kept popping up.

President Bush, in a
press conference, backed Donald Rumsfeld and called himself “the decider” on the issue. Seconds after President Bush used that phrase the whacked-left went nuts and claimed he was an idiot because “decider” is not a word. They gathered, like a pack of retarded hyenas, at their favorite websites to make fun of him. But, as usual, the facts proved them wrong. It is an actual word that has an actual meaning…

De*cid*er: is a noun
Or "something that settles the outcome of a contest or argument."

Around the same time, Tim Robbins attacked the President and claimed he was “renditioning” innocent people to be tortured. It just so happens that “renditioning" is not a real word…I thought it was funny because Robbins, like most libs, like to call Bush stupid. And even though they make fun of Georgie Boy, he still received better grades than Kerry did at Yale.
If Bush is dumb that would make them dumber, right?

Bill Bans “mom” and “dad” from Textbooks

You’re not going to believe this but I assure you it is very true. A bill has been steam-rolling its way through, none other than the California State Congress, that will ban the words “mom” and "dad” from every textbook grades 1-12. Not only that, the bill forces schools to educate students about the contributions that homosexual individuals have made to society. All of this nonsense in an attempt to “accurately portray the sexual diversity of our society”. [Story]

In this not so subtle, yet accepted indoctrination, lies the heart of the beast that wishes are country harm. This is just as bad as if a state forced students to learn the Bible. What makes gay people so special that students must learn about their contributions? Hell, I’m special so I demand that California teach how great I am because if they don’t, then that’s discrimination. How dare they not teach my contributions!

What’s next? School kids can no longer comment on the environment because some people might be color-blind and get offended that others get to see the blue sky and green grass? Or how about the contributions of transsexuals to this country or those who practice bestiality? I’m sure at one point in history there was some guy that liked to bang horses who did something good for society. What about midgets? They’re discriminated against all the time…let’s have midget Monday in every school! How 'bout that!

...What the hell is going on in this country?

Weapons-Grade Uranium Found in Iran

Well, as the head of the IAEA wants to actually reward Iran for ignoring their 30-day demand, weapons inspectors have said they found traces of weapons-grade uranium at a military facility inside that country. The only reason to enrich uranium to this density is to use it in a nuclear warhead. (Breitbart) "The U.N. atomic agency has found traces of highly enriched uranium at an Iranian site linked to the country's defense ministry, diplomats said Friday. The finding added to concerns that Tehran was hiding activities that could be used to make nuclear arms.

The diplomats, who demanded anonymity in exchange for revealing the confidential information, said the findings were preliminary and still had to be confirmed through other lab tests. But they said the density of enrichment appeared close to or beyond weapons grade _ the level used to make nuclear warheads."

That puts to rest the stupid claims from those that have insisted Iran is just after a peaceful energy program. It's obvious diplomacy has given Iran the time to build nuclear weapons, they are building nuclear weapons and if nothing is done, millions of people will die. And what pisses me off is that Hitler Ahmadinejad writes one letter to the US and all of a sudden, to the left, he is a damn hero. Any person that claims Iran is only after energy, diplomacy is working, or supports Iran building nuclear weapons because it's unfair that Israel has them, is an idiot and should be immediately shot in the face.

Oh How the Lies Fly at CNN

Jack Cafferty, of CNN, allowed his discontent for our president to lead him to denounce his country today by claiming we live in a dictatorship. No, he wasn’t referring to Iran, North Korea, or China because he saves his really strong vitriolic remarks for his own country while understating the real threat that actual dictators pose to us. His statement was in response to the new USA Today story about the NSA gathering records of phone numbers.

Cafferty is the same person who claimed that George W. Bush colluded with Osama Bin Laden to time the release of the terrorist’s video and audio tapes [CNN Implies Bush Put Out Osama Video]. All you have to do on CNN is launch baseless attacks at the President or the GOP and you have a job.

In the latest crazed-Cafferty-comment he said, “We better hope that nothing happens to Arlen Specter, the republican head of the senate judiciary committee, cause he might be all that’s standing between us and a full blown dictatorship in this country.” He then went on to mischaracterize the Justice Department's investigation into the NSA surveillance program, which is separate from this new program, to scare CNN viewers. He also insinuated that the military, ordered by President Bush, has not been looking for Osama Bin Laden. All lies by the way.

Check out the Video: WMV or MP4 version via ETL

NSA Compiles Millions of Records...Good!

This morning USA Today put out a piece, although fair, designed to help the democrats attack General Hayden in the upcoming CIA conformation hearings. The report indicates that the Government has collected millions of records of phone information and has compiled those records into a database. The database is used, according to the paper, to generate patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity. This story has no direct evidence to support their claim nor does it provide any information other than the anonymous source told me it was true. The newspaper provided legitimate rebuttals to the initial story but, as known beforehand, the media doesn’t care to give out any facts just the big “shocker” headline.

According to USA Today, the NSA isn’t even listening or recording phone conversations but simply compiling information in a database to generate patterns. No human being, if this report is true, sees the phone information or the records. It doesn’t even collect names or conversations. Plus, the new Patriot Act specifcally authorizes this type of collection. Of course that doesn’t matter to our Democratic friends that see another opportunity to attack the president for setting up a terrorist prevention program. I guess the Democrats believe that George Bush is seeking all of these records so he can look at every single one and have a good chuckle as if this was some kind of a frat party. As I have said before, the Democrats didn’t care much about privacy when they used a political operative to steal the financial records of Michael Steele. But when it comes to tracking, oh say, terrorists!…then they get upset.

Update: The database only looks at numbers and every number that number connects to. So that way if a call is flagged this new database can quickly bring up every number that the suspected terrorist's number links to. It’s a very great idea and that is why I support it. It makes sense. But I'm not surprised that many people, both Democrat and Republican, are jumping on this story. The GOP feels this is a liability in the upcoming election and the Dems feel this can be used to attack President Bush. I do however, agree that this program should be looked into. Unfortunately, the demagoguery on the part of the opposition party is so outrages that when the facts come out and disprove their wild and idiotic accusations, as usual, it doesn’t really matter because the intended damage is already done. The Bush-haters will hate and beat their chests like the rabid monkeys they are and they will continue to look for more ways to hurt our country. And here I thought we were at war...silly me.

"The UN Exposed" on the Daily Show

Fox News reporter Eric Shawn was the guest on the Daily Show last night. He was promoting his new book about the United Nations corruption and its diluted efforts to live up to its ideals. The book is called “The UN Exposed” and it is a must read for the people who have yet to come to conclusion that this organization is a failed institute. Many people on the left see the UN as a beacon of hope, which is an indicator of how delusional people can be. And this delusion is not only for the average whacked-liberal; it also takes root in some comedians, including Jon Stewart.

During the interview, Stewart had a difficult time understanding how the UN’s unwillingness to enforce the 17 resolutions it directed towards Iraq led to the war we are currently in. He couldn’t quite grasp how the fact that France and Russia’s promise to veto any war resolution, and their intentions to lift sanctions, gave Saddam Hussein a reason not to comply. If the UN backed the US instead of aiding Saddam Hussein, this war would have never happened. But don’t tell the libs that…they don’t like the truth.

Jon Stewart also tried to downplay the corruption of the United Nations by likening it to the United States...Yes Jon, all countries are corrupt to some degree. But we are talking about the UN. So save your America-bashing for the other 20 minutes of the show. Thanks. It’s funny to watch these people squirm in an attempt to find a way to defend the indefensible. It’s like watching a roach on its back, trying in vain, to flip itself over.

And when Eric Shawn brought up the current Iran issue, Jon Stewart tried to veer the subject away from the inevitable UN-assisted catastrophe by complimenting the organization’s ability to bring countries together. OK jonny boy, we get it, you love the UN; it’s your messiah. Another thing I noticed is how the morons in the audience never laugh or cheer when they hear the truth. You could say Bush is evil and the war is for oil…huge applause; people pissing themselves. Then you can say, legalize weed…huge applause; people crapping themselves. But if you mention how France, Russia and the UN were bribed by Hussein, all you get is…but America blah, blah, blah.

I’m hoping a video of the interview is posted but if you want to see Eric Shawn on Hannity & Colmes you can check it out here:
WMV or MP4 video via ETL

What the Fuck!

(Daily Bulletin) While Minuteman civilian patrols are keeping an eye out for illegal border crossers, the U.S. Border Patrol is keeping an eye out for Minutemen -- and telling the Mexican government where they are.

According to three documents on the Mexican Secretary of Foreign Relations Web site, the U.S. Border Patrol is to notify the Mexican government as to the location of Minutemen and other civilian border patrol groups when they participate in apprehending illegal immigrants -- and if and when violence is used against border crossers... A U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman confirmed the notification process, describing it as a standard procedure meant to reassure the Mexican government that migrants' rights are being observed.

What! The U.S. government’s rationale for spying on American citizens, who are no threat to the nation, is the observing of “migrant rights”. They have no right to cross the border! If any questions remain in your mind about how our government has betrayed its people then this discovery and admission should leave you no doubt.

***I have always thought that our government wanted, not necessarily illegal immigration, but the non-stop drug flow into this country to continue unabated. And this has me conflicted because I understand the reasoning. The United States has a need for what is know as “Black Operations” to operate in situations that are “illegal” and cannot have any connection to our government itself. The need for black ops is critical especially now in the war on terror given that we have to be in countries that don’t want us to be there. It is my belief that these operations are directly funded by the drugs and drug money that is confiscated at the southern border. That is why the head of Homeland Security and other Intel services have ordered the border patrol to ignore the Minutemen’s tips on immigrant traffic while spying on them so their locations can be provided to the Mexicans. The reason this money is used to fund “illegal” incursions is because it is free, but more importantly, it cannot be traced back to any official expenditure put forth by the government. Secret wars cost money and what better place to get billions of dollars of untraceable currency than on the southern border.***

However, the U.S Government has been actively undermining the Constitution of the United States of America and that makes the ousting of the leaders directly responsible for this action justified and according to our founding, legal. Those responsible for facilitating illegal immigration and drug traffic into this country are now, without doubt, an Enemy of the State. Although I agree with their intentions to fund covert actions, I do not agree with risking our security and allowing this country to be overrun with illegal immigrants. If my theory is correct, which I think it is, a very simple cost-benefit analysis should show that funding action designed to protect our country does not outweigh the real risk of a nuclear device being smuggled through the border and detonated in a major U.S. city.

Call your local leaders, call your senator and call the White House and demand this policy be stopped. This border issue, if unchecked, will lead to a violent uprising and frankly, it might be necessary.

The War In Iraq

Some people in this country, including myself and perhaps the president, feel it is our duty as a nation, when in our interest, to use our power as a force to overthrow regimes or to establish footholds in strategic places. I could write an entire book about the intricacies of this subject and the following but this is a website so I will stick to the basics.

Iraq was invaded and Hussein was overthrown for many reasons. However, the main reason had nothing to do with Weapons of Mass Destruction. I accept that and I knew that then based on a careful study of the situation and my analysis of the Bush Administration. This line of thought is based on the post 9/11 mindset which I hope many other people would adopt. That, of course, is wishful thinking but none the less, I hope others can come to share my outlook. I will start with the push to war and why I feel it was important.

The President of the United States was presented, I’m sure, with many plans or scenarios that outlined the strategic possibilities and goals that were worth consideration in terms of Iraq. Among the key players in the administration and even in the previous administration basically felt one of two ways about the situation. A) Regime change in Iraq is necessary but that necessity should be dealt with by using diplomatic pressure. Or B) Regime change in Iraq is necessary but that necessity cannot be dealt with by diplomacy and war is the only option. I happen to share the second view and that is the way I feel about the current situation with Iran. This stance is based on what I think is commonsense and an understating of the consequences and benefits of either allowing a regime like that of Saddam Hussein to stay active or to take action to overthrow it. The cost of inaction far outweighs the cost of what we are seeing today and that position is justified by the consequences the world witnessed after the appeasement of a certain madman by the name of Adolf Hitler. For this reason, I understand and even support, I say that cautiously, how the WMD argument was used to gain support for the current conflict. And by “used” I mean it was a convenient way to get the American people on their side. And before some people fly off the handle and start bashing the president; this form of manipulation has been used by Democrats during war time including WW2.

The truth is this: the WMD argument was so clear-cut to use to push for what some, including myself, felt was a necessary step in the long term effort for the security of America, that it was used. Saying to the world that Hussein had such weapons was probably the only way this war, deemed necessary, was going to happen. Now, if the president came out and said we want to take out Saddam Hussein because he is an enemy and just because he is Saddam Hussein, I would have said, do it. I would have supported it…even if 9/11 never happened. But that is me and I know many people would support that goal in spirit but not in a real effort. So, even though the regime acquiring nuclear weapons was a real and dangerous threat it was still only the secondary motive. The primary motive being a strategic first step in undermining the entire Middle East structure of anti-American regimes… but that is way too complicated to discuss on a blog so I will leave it at that. WMD being the administration's secondary motive says a lot about how intense their feelings, like the feelings of most Democrats, were about regime change in the heart of the Middle East. That is not to say that the WMD issue is not important because it is and I’ll try to explain why. Also, for the people who think that the Democratic leadership did not want this war as much as the Bush Administration, I’m sorry to say that you are sadly mistaken. Don’t mistake their current political rhetoric for their true beliefs because it is only being used for political advancement.

John Kerry himself pushed for ground troops in 1998
saying, "I think there is a disconnect between the depth of the threat that Hussein presents to the world and what we are talking about doing. We have to prepared to go the full distance… I’m personally prepared [to send ground troops] if that is what it meant; if he can rebuild chemical and biological [weapons]. We will not eliminate the problem [Hussein] with a bombing attack… [Talking about the idea of going to war with Iraq] I am way ahead of the commander in chief, and probably way ahead of my colleagues, and certainly of much of the country. But I believe this. I believe that he has used these weapons before, he has invaded another country, he views himself as a modern day Nebakanezer... And I think we have to stand up to that." This war was wanted, and rightly so, by many democrats in power. That's why they voted for it.

Moving on… The reason so many leaders of both parties wanted regime change in Iraq is because their outlook, despite their rhetoric, is similar to mine. It is a no-nonsense view of national security. Saddam Hussein, like the current Iranian regime, was in fact a direct enemy of the United States of America. It was in our vital long-term interest to remove him from power just as it is vitally important to prevent Iran from furthering their quest to acquire nuclear weapons. And the argument of Hussein was isolated is only valid if nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons were not part of reality. Because being isolated has nothing to do with, nor does it prevent, a regime from providing an organization hell-bent on the destruction of Israel and the United States with weapons designed to inflict massive damage to a civilian population.

Saddam Hussein would have eventually reconstituted his weapons program and he would have provided or directly used that technology to kill thousands if not millions of people. Do you think the hatred and the desperate need on the part of Islamic extremists to kill as many people as possible is fake or somehow hyped? It’s not; it’s real and very soon you and I will witness massive death. Rouge elements in rouge regimes will stop at nothing to fulfill what they believe is their god-demanded duty to destroy the non-Muslim inhabitants of this world; starting with the Jews. How are you going to feel when, not if, the first nuclear device is detonated in one of our major cities? Some people are clueless and completely unhinged from reality that they will never understand what I’m talking about but when they are dead, I’m sure they won’t be complaining.

Saddam Hussein would have provided the people who wish to destroy us, with the means to do so. Just as Iran is sure to do when they get their hands on the bomb. Peace is impossible and those of you who do not realize that very simple fact are lost in a world of ignorance. And those who think that suicidal maniacs are worried about committing suicide by passing nukes to Al Qaeda, are the dumbest people on this planet. The phrase “Iran won’t pass on their weapons to terrorists because that would be suicide” is the single most moronic statement I have ever heard. Just because a jihadist might be a high ranking official in a rogue regime doesn’t make him a rational person. A jihadist willing to blow himself up or who is on a quest for holy war is by no means hindered by the thought of suicide…they actually embrace it. And it’s that understanding that is behind the need for our country to start using its military might to counter the very real threat of nuclear devastation. This is not some quaint concept that has no bearing on our decision makers. I think it is the only concept that truly matters when weighing this war on terror.

But, for the idealists, it is true; words are weapons too...isn’t that a profound flower blooming with happiness? unfortunately, those words usually arm our enemies and convince impressionable youths to strap a bomb-belt to their waist and blow up a bus full of innocent people or fly jetliners into buildings.