To Hell with Organized Religion

What is religion? In my opinion, organized religion is CONTROL. It’s an accepted indoctrination on the part of millions of Americans who send their children to churches, synagogues or Mosques to be told what to believe. And much of the material they are told, and in some ways forced to believe, is not fitting with reality. I know many of my conservative friends might be upset at the thought of being used by religion but that’s what’s happening and what has always happened. I’m not saying that your local places of worship are not filled with caring and nice people because I’m sure they are. What I am saying is that Church is not God. The Vatican is not God.

Religion is a tool that is used on the highest of levels to control people’s beliefs. In some cases it is a pure effort based on what is felt to be right and in some cases it’s a devious scheme to keep individuals in line. For example, Pat Robertson, the televangelist, flat-out lies by telling his followers that God speaks to him and warns him of pending occurrences. He lies to get their money and they happily send him a check. The Point is: Religion is a manifestation of power. Power that ultimately takes away from the very same God people claim to worship. And using that phrase “worship” brings me to another point.

Worshiping in Churches is something God does not want you to do. Think about it. The concept of worshiping is a man-made concept that is based on an egotistical mindset. Claiming that you need to worship God is, in my opinion, a direct slap in the face to him. By claiming God wants or needs to be worshiped is ascribing, to the Divine, human character flaws such as the need to be loved. Placing man’s insecurities upon God is something, if you believe in his existence, that should not be done. The Church gets you to believe that you need to worship in order to fulfill your faith by convincing you that they are the key to Heaven. But that is not true; in fact I think God reveres those people who question what his self-appointed spokesmen say and those who think logically for themselves.

I believe in God and I believe in Angels because I can feel them. I don’t trust words from books written by people who claimed to have spoken to God or people who claim to have the answers. I don’t base my beliefs on religious institutions nor will I ever do so. We all have our ways and I can’t tell you what to believe or how to feel. But the one thing I do know is that if you’re afraid of questioning your beliefs, you are not truly free.

Saddam Forced To Watch South Park

Saddam Hussein, according to Trey Parker and Matt Stone (the creators of South Park), is being forced to watch the animated movie South Park: Bigger Longer and Uncut in his prison cell. Now this is interesting (for those who haven’t seen the movie or heard of the Comedy Central series) because in “Bigger Longer and Uncut” Saddam Hussein is one of the main characters. In fact, he is the Devil’s dildo-loving, homosexual lover.

Yahoo News) Former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein is being made to watch his appearance in cult cartoon South Park while he is behind bars. The deposed leader on trial in Iraq was featured in the movie spin-off as the lover of the devil. South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut featured Hussein and Satan attempting to take over the world together.

Speaking at the Edinburgh International Television Festival, South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone said US Marines guarding the former dictator during his trial for genocide were making him watch the movie "repeatedly".

This is the single greatest thing I have ever read in my life: A brutal tyrant who has killed hundreds of thousands of people; who has sent innocent human beings through meat grinders, dipped human beings in acid baths and sprayed towns with chemical weapons-- is now in prison watching a cartoon in which he is the gay-lover of Satan. That is so over-the-top crazy that it’s hard for me to wrap my head around. All I can say is, Bravo to the Marines; that is genius.

PlameGate Conspiracy Bites the Dust

The countless accusations and conspiracies surrounding the Valerie Plame incident have, once again, been proven moronic on the part of the opposition party. According to the new book out by Michael Isikoff and David Corn (by no means conservative) the outing of Plame’s status came not from Karl Rove or President Bush but was accidentally mentioned to former CNN analyst, Robert Novak by then Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. And it is important to note that Mr. Armitage is an opponent of the Iraq war, including some key parts of the Bush Foreign policy.

Armitage had been at home reading the newspaper and had come across a column by journalist Robert Novak. Months earlier, Novak had caused a huge stir when he revealed that Valerie Plame, wife of Iraq-war critic Joseph Wilson, was a CIA officer. Ever since, Washington had been trying to find out who leaked the information to Novak. The columnist himself had kept quiet. But now, in a second column, Novak provided a tantalizing clue: his primary source, he wrote, was a “senior administration official” who was “not a partisan gunslinger.” Armitage was shaken. After reading the column, he knew immediately who the leaker was. On the phone with Powell that morning, Armitage was “in deep distress,” says a source directly familiar with the conversation who asked not to be identified because of legal sensitivities. “I’m sure he’s talking about me.”

Armitage’s admission led to a flurry of anxious phone calls and meetings that day at the State Department. (Days earlier, the Justice Department had launched a criminal investigation into the Plame leak after the CIA informed officials there that she was an undercover officer.) Within hours, William Howard Taft IV, the State Department’s legal adviser, notified a senior Justice official that Armitage had information relevant to the case. The next day, a team of FBI agents and Justice prosecutors investigating the leak questioned the deputy secretary. Armitage acknowledged that he had passed along to Novak information contained in a classified State Department memo: that Wilson’s wife worked on weapons-of-mass-destruction issues at the CIA. (The memo made no reference to her undercover status.) Armitage had met with Novak in his State Department office on July 8, 2003—just days before Novak published his first piece identifying Plame. Powell, Armitage and Taft, the only three officials at the State Department who knew the story, never breathed a word of it publicly and Armitage’s role remained secret.
Let’s Review: Dick Cheney had nothing to do with it. Karl Rove had nothing to do with it. President Bush had nothing to do with it. The Fitzgerald investigation has yielded no damning evidence because it doesn’t exist. The shameless whining from the left looks to be, as always, in vain. And the Democrats contradictory support for the outing of top secret programs by the likes of the New York Times looks a lot more hypocritical now then it did yesterday.
Quote From ABP

The Deranged Musings of a Madman

Russell Shaw, a liberal blogger for the Huffington Post, wrote a piece that basically tries to justify another 9-11 type attack on American soil. The reason why he would like to see another terrorist attack on the United States is because he feels that if we are hit again, it will prove that George Bush hasn’t kept us safe, and it will propel the Democrats to victory in 2008. The logic, or rather twisted logic, he used to justify his argument for the killing of his fellow countrymen by a terrorist group such as Al Qaeda, is that it would ultimately save lives. In his mind, it would put Democrats in power which would in turn mean, (because Democrats are magical angels sent from heaven to better our world), that the United States would be spared countless deaths.

Now he worded the article in such a way that in case he was called out for what he said, he could simply say it was an exercise in “what ifs” but it’s obvious that he’s trying to convince himself that his extreme and idiotic beliefs are honorable.

He lists the typical fairytale talking points as reasons why it would be good for us to be targeted. Reasons like: Democrats would create universal healthcare, they would protect woman from back-alley abortions, they would fund stem cell research, enforce stricter gun control, and would raise the minimum wage; all of this, in his opinion, would save hundreds of thousands of lives making another 9/11 a good thing. And even though his reasons don’t make sense in that Democrats, while in power, never created universal healthcare and won't in the future, there is no evidence that raising the minimum wage alleviates poverty, gun control doesn’t stem violence or violent acts, and stem cell research is already being funded, he still asks the question: If you knew us getting hit again would launch a chain of transformative, cascading events that would enable a better nation where millions who would have died will live longer, would such a calculus have any moral validity?

This piece is so Na├»ve and grotesquely self-righteous that I can’t even think about it for very long because my head starts spinning and I feel like vomiting. But if you want to delve in the warped psyche of a deranged Bush-hater, then go ahead and read his
Ace of Spades.

My New Smith & Wesson

Today was a great day for gun ownership in this country. I purchased the brand new Smith and Wesson M&P .40. A gripping firearm that, if pointed at you, would be put the shit in your pants in half a second.

The M&P 40

And very soon I will qualify with this bad boy. I qualified with 100s for the 357 and just yesterday with a 45 semi-auto. But now I have, in my possession, the Military and Police .40 and will likely not want to shoot anything else; at least for a while.

Model: M&P
Caliber: .40S&W
Capacity: 15+1 Rounds
Barrel Length: 4.25"
Front Sight: Steel Ramp Dovetail Mount - Tritium Sights Optional
Rear Sight: Steel Novak® Lo-Mount Carry - Tritium Sights Optional
Trigger Pull: 6.5 lbs.
Trigger Travel: Rest to Fire .300 in.
Trigger Reset: Approx. .140 in.
Frame: Large
Finish: Slide and Barrel Black Melonite®, 68HRc
Overall Length: 7.5"
Material: Zytel Polymer Frame, Stainless Steel Barrel/Slide and Structural Components
Weight Empty (No Mag): 24.25 oz.
Overall Height: 5.5"
Width: 1.2"
Sight Length: 6.4"

NSA Judge Gave Money to ACLU

If you were wondering why the recent ruling of one Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ignored precedent and her opinion was criticized by a wide range of legal scholars, then look no further than here. It turns out that when the ACLU was shopping around for appointed judges to hear their truly lousy case based on what their clients claimed was “fear” of being overheard in their business conversations overseas, they found a candidate that evidently holds their sympathy. Judicial Watch has uncovered the fact that Anna Diggs Taylor serves as a secretary and a trustee for the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan. And this foundation, at her direction, donated $45,000 to the America Civil Liberties Union.

So the ACLU found a Judge who was appointed by Jimmy Carter and who directed funds to their organization to hear their case; a case that will most definitely be overturned. To me the simple fact that Taylor is a huge supporter of the ACLU is enough to understand how she came to her decision on the NSA warrant-less surveillance program. Because it seems to me that the leftist lady in robes was dead set on making a political statement instead of a fair independent decision—but that’s how the game works. And we all know how far some groups will go to undermine the war on terror and we have all come to know why.

'Condemning Iran is Supporting Bush'

Many people have noticed the absent outrage over the Iran crisis coming from our pals on the left. We have seen the lack of condemnation directed at our enemies and have seen the blame and coarseness being directed at the United States and in particular, President Bush. I have suggested why this is the case in the past so I was pleasantly surprised when someone finally admitted to why we are seeing little outrage for Iran’s Hitler-light. So why have they completely ignored the very dangerous threat of Iran and why are they so hesitant to condemn the regime or support action against it? --Because it might help Bush.

Kevin Drum of the Washington Monthly: I know perfectly well that criticism of Iran is not just criticism of Iran. Whether I want it to or not, it also provides support for the Bush administration's determined and deliberate effort to whip up enthusiasm for a military strike. Only a naif would view criticism of Iran in a vacuum, without also seeing the way it will be used by an administration that has demonstrated time and again that it can't be trusted to act wisely.

So what to do? For the most part, I end up saying very little. And Beinart is right: there's a sense in which that betrays my own liberal ideals. But he's also wrong, because like it or not, my words — and those of other liberals — would end up being used to advance George Bush's distinctly illiberal ends. And I'm simply not willing to be a pawn in the Bush administration's latest marketing campaign.

Finally! Someone had the courage to admit that their hatred for our President has caused them to effectively root against our country and embolden our enemies. What a relief to know that the many hours of pointing out example after example and point after point has become solidified by the admission of one of those people who I, and many of you, have been fighting against. This is another lesson in why our struggles have basically come down to it being the far-left, Al Qaeda, Iran, North Korea, Hezbollah, and Hamas, versus the United States. Remember that this mindset; the Bush-Hating liberal mindset, is the underlying reason for their treachery. From NSA leaks, to sympathizing with terrorists to undermining the war on terror; it is all based on one thing…
H/T: Ace of Spades

Muslim Sensitivity Training

Why are Muslims so Angry? Well, Mr. Garrison has the answer in one of the best episodes of South Park.

Mr. Garrison: Welcome to Muslim-Sensitivity Training. It is important for us to understand why the Muslim feel the way they do, and why we can never show an image of Muhammad….

Mr. Garrison: Let's all look at why Muslims are upset: [turns and picks up a stick of chalk] First of all, in the Muslim religion, you're not allowed to have what? [no response] Sex. Good. [writes "NO SEX" on the board] There's no sex until marriage in the Muslim world. Now, this would be fine except that in the Muslim religion you also can't... Anybody? [no response] Jack off. [writes "NO JACKING OFF" on the board] Okay, jacking it is strictly forbidden in the Muslim religion. And what do we know about the places Muslims live? They live in? [no response] Good, sand. [writes "SAND" on the board] Now put yourself in the shoes of a Muslim. It's Friday night, but you can't have sex, and you can't jack off. There's sand in your eyes and probably in the crack of your ass, and then some cartoon comes along from a country where people are getting laid, and mocks your prophet. Well you know what? I'd be pretty pissed off too!

No sex, no jacking off, no alcohol, and you live in the desert with sand in your ass…Yeah, that’ll do it. Now if we can just get them to loosen up with the tenets of their faith we can solve this whole Middle East Crisis in not time!

You Must be a Liberal

-If you believe that George Bush planned and executed 9/11 with hundreds of conspirators from top aids to low level FAA workers and have no doubts that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled explosions and not by two huge fully fueled airliners, then you must be a Liberal.

-If you believe Democrats care about the poor and are tolerant of others, you must be a liberal.

-If you’re flying in private jets while preaching to America the dangers of global warming, you must be a liberal

-If the bulk of your wealth is in offshore banks to avoid paying taxes but you’re against the Bush tax cuts, in favor of the death tax, and attack Republicans for “helping the rich get richer and the poor get poorer", then you must be a liberal.

-If you believe that it’s not the terrorist-insurgents that have killed thousands of US servicemen in Iraq but George Bush himself, then you must be a liberal.

-If you read AmericaBlog or the Daily Kos and think to yourself, this is a truthful and intelligent blog, you must be a liberal.

If You think trees have feelings, animals can conceptualize but a fetus is just a blob of protoplasm, then you must be a liberal.(-)

-If you have said the phrase neocon Nazi in the last two weeks, you must be a liberal.

-If you believe that Israel is a rogue state and Hezbollah are the protectors of the people of Lebanon, you must be a liberal.

-And if you’re reading this and suddenly feel the need to call me a chickenhawk or keyboard commando or some other lame label you picked up from some stupid website or if you think coming up with a counter list makes you special, then you must be a liberal.

We the People and Al Qaeda...

The NSA’s warrantless wiretapping program, in a lawsuit filed by the ACLU, has been ruled unconstitutional by US District Court judge Anna Diggs Taylor. And just for the record, Taylor was appointed by none other than Jimmy Carter, the country’s foremost terrorist-enabler.

This ruling is a welcomed one by the far-left who have wished for no less than the complete removal of all realistic terrorist-fighting methods and who are under the false impression, according the FISA Act author, that the NSA’s program is illegal. However, the ruling of one Carter-appointed judge will be appealed and will likely be overturned in the near future. For those of us who are worried that this vital program will be shut down need not panic but only realize how important it is to vote Republican in November and in 2008; so that we ensure that no more insane judges are nominated to such important seats of power.

#1 President on Mid East Matters?

Jonathan Tobin, the executive editor of the Jewish Exponent, claimed on Your World with Neil Cavuto that President Bush has been the best president on Middle East matters in recent history. This opinion is based on what Tobin described as the removal of failed policies and the fact that George Bush has Israel’s back in regards to its military efforts to combat terrorism.

TOBIN: I think it's pretty easy to see why. Unlike President Carter and certainly President Clinton, who is the immediate past example, President Bush has gotten rid of some of the failed policies of the past, which, whenever there has been a crisis involving Israel and its Arab enemies, has -- the instinct has always been to appease the Arabs and try and pressure Israel not to take a military advantage or not to defend itself fully…What we've seen in the last month is an example of President Bush having Israel's back. He gave Israel the green light it needed to do what it thought it needed to do…

In my opinion, Mr. Tobin is accurate to say that President Bush has been a better President in terms of the Middle East and Israel than President Clinton or Carter. I only say that because it’s nearly impossible to be any worse than either Clinton or Carter in this regard. Through the unbelievable appeasement of both the Democratic leaders mentioned is where I believe groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda gained strength. If the Middle East is the maniac and terrorist groups are the weapon then Clinton and Carter would be the two dead people (America) who just got shot because they blindly hoped that if they begged the maniac he would spare them.

What we are seeing today, and even in Iraq, is the result of the failed policies of past Administrations and the United Nations who thought by putting off the inevitable, the inevitable would somehow go away. In that sense, George Bush has been a better force because he has removed the old mindset that has brought us to this point in the first place.

Many people will disagree because they think the Middle East has become a bloody mess. That war is not the answer and only makes things worse. Of Course, in my opinion, that’s a genuinely misguided view because that lack of action that they claim was peace is one of the main reasons we are in the predicament that we currently find ourselves. --- Overall, what would be the best policy for the United States to have?

A Stage in the Devil’s Theater

There is not much news that can be reported on that hasn’t already been discussed all over the net so I decided to post a video that I was reluctant to post a few days ago. Sometimes a person is exposed on a video that gives people, who continually deny such actions take place, a moment of pause and hopefully a dose of reality. There are people in this wolrd, many people in fact, who don’t believe this type of thing takes place; whose sympathies lie not with the right but with the enemy. And for you this video is for…

***A Must See***

I hope you took the short amount of time it takes to watch this embed. And now that you have seen what can only be described as demonically propagadnous I will share with you another bit of information that I recently learned.

A photojournalist named Byran Denton, who has worked with the New York Times, has admitted to seeing Lebanese journalists and photographers unearthing dead human bodies and using those bodies to stage pictures for the world to see. He has seen wire news photographers digging up the remains of those deceased and putting them in the arms of people to get the desired picture of carnage. Via LGF.

I have been working in lebanon since all this started, and seeing the behavior of many of the lebanese wire service photographers has been a bit unsettling. while hajj has garnered a lot of attention for his doctoring of images digitally, whether guilty or not, i have been witness to the daily practice of directed shots, one case where a group of wire photogs were choreographing the unearthing of bodies, directing emergency workers here and there, asking them to position bodies just so, even remove bodies that have already been put in graves so that they can photograph them in peoples arms. these photographers have come away with powerful shots, that required no manipulation digitally, but instead, manipulation on a human level, and this itself is a bigger ethical problem.

We Surrender, They Whine, Some Skew

Well now that Israel and the US effectively surrendered to the terrorist-organization Hezbollah and one of their greatest assets, the United Nations, we can rest easy at the beautiful “peace” we will now see in the Middle East.

The UN deal has no mention of Hezbollah being disarmed nor does it call for the kidnapped Israeli soldier to be returned.

--In other news, two of the captured terrorist plotters who planned to blow up commerical airliners, are now claiming mistreatment by British authorities (What a shocker, huh). suspected terrorists complaining about their treatment …who’d a thunk it.

--What else is going on? Oh, maybe some possible media bias. A couple of days after NBC insinuated that the Bush administration planned the release of the terror-plot news to help their political standing; they produced an anonymous source to help back up the claim. But a quick review of their wording gives the impression that NBC might be reaching for a story rather than reporting a fact. I’m paraphrasing here but what they basically wrote is that “an anonymous senior British official, knowledgable about the case, suggested the attack was not imminent.” Yeah, the unnamed guy suggested something about something that NBC says he has knowledge of but countless other reports contradict. -
Story- you can bet that’s enough to get some people to believe…

NBC: Why No Terror Plot Leak?

In a great example of either complete idiocy or inherent bias, an NBC reporter stationed at the Western White House named Kevin Corke, wondered why President Bush didn’t disclose details of the plot that was recently thwarted by British authorities. "Yeah well said because a lot of people here are going to be asking the question, not only today but in the days to come, if, if the administration has known about this potential plot what was the hold up in getting the word out, especially domestically?... but still it does beg the question how long ago did they know of this and why are we just hearing about it right now?"

Yes, what was the hold up, why are we just hearing about it now? What a great question. Hmm, maybe it was a serious effort of complex surveillance, tracking, and human intelligence that was operating from deep undercover in a situation that required discreet and delicate operational perfection with possible devastating consequences in the combating of global terrorism... maybe that's it.

This must be some type of NY Times syndrome where the media desires to put the American public at risk by providing all of our enemies with valued intelligence information. Just two posts down I hinted, in a sarcastic way, at the type of insanity that would be coming from the media and the left in regards to this story.

And like clockwork, crazies from the major liberal websites along with the media, came out claiming that Bush knew about the plot and this story is only being reported to benefit the Administration. Hell,
nearly 50% of the Kos Clowns believe that this threat was not even real but was only meant to be used as a way for “BushCo”, as they phrased it, to “keep us all scarred”. Other major left-wing sites have called it hype and as you can see the MSM is looking for any excuse, even questioning why he kept a secret operation a secret, to rag on Bush. By the way, NSA roving wiretaps along with many of the other tracking methods decried by the left as fascist, were used to stop this plan.

Update, Saturday: Olbermann questions timing of story. Floats conspiracy theories that Bush got Blair to release the story in a politically timed event. The insanity continues...

What Human Shields…

For the anti-American, Anti-Israel Left…you might want to close your eyes and not read any further. This is your Truth Warning.

The picture below is a recent photo of a Palestinian terrorist or “Freedom Fighter” as so many like to call them, shooting at Israeli forces while surrounded by civilians including young kids.

Now, if you lefties ignored my advice and are still reading this then let me explain to you how it works. You see the terrorist with the highly advanced M4 Carbine; well he is using human shields. And say when an Apache helicopter hits him with a rocket, that rocket kills him and those people placed around him. Then after he and the others are killed his terrorist’s buddies, in a propaganda effort, retrieve his weapon and all extremist garb from his body. So that we have a staged story that Israel killed a group of innocent civilians just minding their own business; which the media is more than happy to propagate.

--And here comes the video which shows another group of the left’s beloved terrorists or as Cindy Sheehan describes them, “freedom fighters”, dragging young children around while launching attacks on opposition forces.

I know that some people don’t like the truth but it is what it is. I have even read many comments on certain political sites that have flat-out denied that Hamas and Hezbollah use human shields. But hey, what can you do...
Vid H/T:Drinking From Home

Oh, That War on Terror Thing

It’s like we are combating global terrorism or something. Maybe we can come together as a country and unite against our common enemy… nah, it’s all Bush’s fault. In fact he was deeply involved with the planning; he even provided the advanced explosives to this terrorist cell in hopes to shape the debate for November.

LONDON, Aug. 10-- British authorities said Thursday they had disrupted a well-advanced "major terrorist plot" to blow up passenger flights between the United Kingdom and the United States using liquid explosives, prompting a full-scale security clampdown at U.S. and British airports and a cascade of delays in transatlantic flights.
But whatever you do, don’t send them to Gitmo…they might become hate-filled and violent.

Update: 49% of the Kos Clowns believe the thwarted airline terror-plot was just “more BushCo Drama designed to keep us all afraid.” 1122 votes; 50% feel the plot was legit and 49% believe it was all “BushCo” lies. I guess you can’t fix stupid…POLL

Best Actress in a Bombing Role

By now you have read about the Reuters photos that were doctored to show a more devastating outlook of the Lebanese landscape. And you might have seen the other examples of pictures that looked staged for the public eye; like the Koran burning in the bombed out building. But the recent questions have been directed at the Associated Press for their use of an Israeli air strike victim.

It seems that the same woman was pictured at two different buildings in the same clothes wailing in agony over the loss of her home and family.
Reuters captured the grieving lady in front of her apartment screaming for the cameras and the Associated Press captured the woman 2 weeks later in front of another house which they also claimed was her home. Same lady, two different homes, both times mourning the loss of her property.

A Lebanese woman wails after looking at the wreckage of her apartment, in a building, that was demolished by the Israeli attacks in southern Beirut July 22, 2006. REUTERS/Issam Kobeisi

A Lebanese woman reacts at the destruction after she came to inspect her house in the suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, Saturday, Aug. 5, 2006, after Israeli warplanes repeatedly bombed the area overnight.(AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

If only Hollywood actors were this good…She’s got my nomination!
Whether she was purposely used by the media to get the photo they wanted or if she is an operative of Anti-Israeli forces in Lebanon, is not yet determined. However, what I can say is that nothing coming out of the Middle East can really be trusted. Especially from news agencies that have a tendency to skew reality against Israel.
Drinking From Home Made the Find

Fascist-Left Hacks Lieberman Site

The day the polls opened in the heated Connecticut Primary, Joseph Lieberman’s campaign website was hacked and shut down. There is little doubt in the minds of the Lieberman camp on who is responsible. According to the senator’s campaign manager, the Ned Lamont internet supporters sabotaged their site to better their chances at overthrowing Lieberman.

It’s just another sick example of
liberal fascism. Either you adhere to every belief of the far-left or you will be destroyed politically. It’s that good ole open minded tolerance.

Update: Kos Clown denies any hacking; attacks Lieberman Campaign. He claims that this is ridiculous and he would like to see the charges backed up with evidence. But we all know that the left doesn’t care for evidence when it is not in their favor as seen with the Silberman-Robb report that concluded based on facts and evidence that Bush did not lie or mislead us into war. And the lack of facts and evidence doesn’t stop the left from making up wild conspiracies about Republicans stealing elections or Bush being involved in the plot of 9-11.

Update, 10:00pm: Senator Lieberman loses CT Primary. As an American I’m disappointed. And if I were a moderate or fair-minded Democrat I would take a deeper look at where your party is headed.

Never Mind the Glaring Hypocrisy

When a committed Democrat like Lanny Davis, the former White House Special Counsel to President Clinton, starts to see how deranged and totally unhinged Liberal America has become, then you know that it’s bad. But even when he finally admitted to the true nature of modern day liberalism he still could not hold back his own hatred.

(Bigotry and hate aren't just for right-wingers anymore) My brief and unhappy experience with the hate and vitriol of bloggers on the liberal side of the aisle comes from the last several months I spent campaigning for a longtime friend, Joe Lieberman. This kind of scary hatred, my dad used to tell me, comes only from the right wing-- in his day from people such as the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy, with his tirades against "communists and their fellow travelers".

I came to believe that we liberals couldn't possibly be so intolerant and hateful, because our ideology was famous for ACLU-type commitments to free speech, dissent and, especially, tolerance for those who differed with us. And in recent years-- I held on to the view that the left was inherently more tolerant and less hateful than the right… Now, in the closing days of the Lieberman primary campaign, I have reluctantly concluded that I was wrong. The far right does not have a monopoly on bigotry and hatred and sanctimony.

So Davis is making a point about how the left has devolved into a pack of hyenas, who are full of hate and intolerance, by misguidedly attacking “right-wingers” with slurs of bigotry and racism. I suppose, in the liberal world, denouncing your party’s hatred by using hate-filled attacks on people is not a contradiction.

Usually Liberals are so deep in their own hypocritical world that they can’t see the forest for the trees, nor do they want to. His statements in this article prove this to be true. He came to believe that liberals couldn’t be intolerant because his ideology is that of the ACLU and he held onto the view that the left was “inherently more tolerant and less hateful than the right”. The kicker was when he said, “The far right does not have a monopoly on bigotry and hatred and sanctimony.” Lanny Davis can’t even see that he is what he is denouncing.

Hillary Clinton Slams Rumsfeld

I don’t agree with Senator Clinton on very much but I do share her feelings about our current Defense Secretary. Hillary has been on the offensive in her attacks on Donald Rumsfeld which was capped off by her call for his resignation. "I think the president should choose to accept Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation ... The secretary has lost credibility with the Congress and with the people ... It's time for him to step down,” Clinton said Yesterday. "I just don't understand why we can't get new leadership that would give us a fighting chance to turn the situation around before it's too late."

I agree 100%; I don’t understand it either! Iraq is a disaster and quite possibly a failure. We have US generals on the ground talking about a civil war and we have an administration that has lost all credibility with the American people. We are in a situation where our own leadership is either in denial or has completely lost touch with the reality of the situation. Plain and simple; it is incompetence. On the political front, Iraq is advancing. On the security front, Iraq is collapsing. If the President was the leader I knew him to be in his first term, he would have already fired the grossly incompetent head of the DOD. I’ve said it before and some of my Republican friends scoffed, but I will say it again. WE ARE LOSING IN IRAQ.

It pains me to say it but Hillary Clinton is spot on. We didn’t go into Iraq with enough troops… I blamed it on the ridiculous “hearts and minds” strategy. Rumsfeld underestimated the strength and potential of the Insurgency; that’s very clear. And what upsets me is that after it was clear they underestimated the enemy, nothing was done to rectify the obvious problem. It’s like they shoved fingers in their ears and proceeded to slam their heads on a desk yelling la, la, la, I can’t hear you, Iraq will work itself out. Military vehicles aren’t even up-armored and many of the service personnel lack the proper body armor for heaven’s sake. The only thing I disagree with Hillary about, in this instance, is her views on disbanding the Iraqi army…that was something that needed to be done.

All in all, something has to change in our Iraq strategy or it’s a waste. Get rid of the hearts and minds concept and begin to shut down the Sunni Triangle. Either send more troops, in an effort to use overwhelming force to stabilize the provincial hot spots with hopes to stop the violence and further train the Iraqi military, or risk civil war and our untimely withdrawal. Iraq is so important to our long-term strategic objectives that is hard to just say pull out. But something has to change… and I mean fast. It’s obvious the Democrats can’t do it but it seems like this current administration is incapable as well. They just don’t have the will.

Eliminating Israel Will Solve the Crisis

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Thursday the solution to the Middle East crisis is to destroy Israel. Ahmadinejad also called for an immediate halt to fighting in Lebanon between Israel and the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah. "Although the main solution is for the elimination of the Zionist regime, at this stage an immediate cease-fire must be implemented," Ahmadinejad said, according to state-run television in a report posted on its Web site.

Ahh, now I get it. The ultimate goal for groups like Hezbollah and regimes like Iran is to completely destroy Israel. And it is that unwavering necessity that underlies their actions…well, that would mean this is some type of Jihad, right? So, now that it’s official, can we as a world, come together and combat this global threat? Hey, who am I kidding, let’s just stick to condemning Israel.

Just to prove how useless the “world community” is; the French Foreign Minister was actually surprised by his buddy Ahmadinejad. "I totally condemn these words," Philippe Douste-Blazy said... The crisis had presented an opportunity for Iran to "show that it can play a positive and stabilizing role in the region."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is that not hysterically insane? Iran be a stabilizer in the region? What the hell is this guy talking about? Iran is the key player in the destabilization of the Mid East and is regarded as the puppet master of this current conflict. The Foreign Minister also said that he totally condemns those words… gee whiz, those “words”. A) That’s a belief and B) words can’t be condemned; people can though. But keep it up, I’m sure your condemnation of words will magically bring about an unprecedented enlightenment of the extremist mind. And these are the types of people some politicians want us to listen to... We are doomed.

Carter: Israel Kills Civilians to Blame Hezbollah

In a Washington Post editorial, Jimmy Carter claimed that Israel is purposely targeting innocent civilians to "punish" so they can blame it on Hamas and Hezbollah. And no, that’s not a joke…

It is inarguable that Israel has a right to defend itself against attacks on its citizens, but it is inhumane and counterproductive to punish civilian populations in the illogical hope that somehow they will blame Hamas and Hezbollah for provoking the devastating response. The result instead has been that broad Arab and worldwide support has been rallied for these groups, while condemnation of both Israel and the United States has intensified.
This is one of those posts that need no analysis. But I will say, just for the record, that Hezbollah is the terrorist organization that uses populated areas to launch attacks from and regularly uses human shields in the hopes to use their deaths as propaganda. But, of course, a terrorist sympathizer will ignore that simple reality and run head first, while looking to blame Israel, into the concrete wall of stupidity.

So Where the Hell is the Outrage?

Once again, scandalous stories of horrid abuse are coming out of Gitmo. Unfortunately, for some, it's not the type of abuse that can be used to attack the administration or the military. And it’s really not the type of story the media likes to hype. (Associated Press) The prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay during the war on terror have attacked their military guards hundreds of times, turning broken toilet parts, utensils, radios and even a bloody lizard tail into makeshift weapons, Pentagon reports say. Incident reports reviewed by The Associated Press indicate Military Police guards are routinely head-butted, spat upon and doused by “cocktails” of feces, urine, vomit and sperm collected in meal cups by the prisoners.

They’ve been repeatedly grabbed, punched or assaulted by prisoners who reach through the small “bean holes” used to deliver food and blankets through cell doors, the reports say. Serious assaults requiring medical attention…

Very plainly, there are far more cases of abuse directed at US prison guards at Guantanamo Bay than there are of prisoner abuse directed at detainees by military personnel. I know what your thinking and yes; these brutal and genocidal terrorists have garnered the sympathy of millions of people all across the world but the US service personnel in charge of caring for our enemies receive ZERO sympathy. Let me repeat that: nothing, nada, zip, zero... In fact they only receive condemnation and slurs of Nazism from a certain political party and America-haters around the globe.

Isn’t it heartbreaking to know that only a very small number of detainee abuse ever actually occurred at Gitmo and that small number of cases was completely blown up to create a fire of anti-American sentiment; a sentiment that was designed and embraced by our enemies. All the while the real abuse and violence has been directed at the United States military guards who are basically helping to protect the same people who constantly condemn them. Something tells me that the UN, ACLU, the far-left, and the Human Rights organizations that have sympathized with the terrorists housed at Gimto will not share those feelings with the real victims in all of this.