Kerry Calls Troops Stupid...Again!

John Kerry has once again insulted American troops. It might have been a misstatement but chances are that it was not. John Kerry: “You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.” -Audio-

That statement obviously implies that the soldiers in Iraq are too dumb to be anything but a target practice for terrorist-insurgents; or more accurately for my liberal readers, not smart enough to not get stuck in Iraq. (By the way, just in case he forgot… he voted for this war and supported it prior to Bush coming to office)

Kerry has now been backtracking on his statement. He claims it was just a botched joke to get this: call Bush the idiot. Even his excuse is horribly inappropriate and fallacious. But he can make all the excuses he wants because his words speak for themselves.


Kerry, in the past, has insinuated troops in Iraq were too dumb to drive their humvees and chastised them for getting killed by IEDs "But there is no excuse, three and a half years later, for American troops to be driving by IEDs and getting blown up. Are you telling me they can’t drive a truck!"

And then of course there was the time when the Senator claimed US Marines terrorized women and children. -- So, whenever you hear a Democratic strategist use the argument of “why would Kerry insult American forces” or it was simple a botched joke, remember that he did condemn his fellow servicemen during Vietnam and he has made statements like this several times in the past year.

Update, 11/1/06: After Mr. Flip-Flop vowed he "would apologize to no one" he ended up apologizing. "I sincerely regret (bullshit) that my words were misinterpreted (bullshit) to wrongly imply anything negative about those in uniform, and I personally apologize (bullshit) to any service member, family member, or American who was offended." -ABC News-




pic posted at Hot Air

Radical Islam’s War Against the West

Some will never get it. Some don't want to get it... many will refuse to admit it exists. History is repeating itself and they can’t see it. We are back in 1938 and the world is once again blind.



See the whole documentary trailer
here. it's worth it

NFL Week 8 Picks

Opinionnation Picks:

-Cardinals over Packers
-Falcons over Bengals
-Saints over Ravens
-Titans over Texans
-Eagles over Jags
-Seahawks over Chiefs
-Bears over 49ers
-Giants over Bucs
-Chargers over Rams
-Colts over Broncos
-Jets over Browns
-Steelers over Raiders
-Cowboys over Panthers
-Patriots over Vikings- point total- 44

Have a good weekend

Hans Blix: I Miss Saddam Hussein

The former chief weapons inspector to the United Nations has saved his criticism not for the UN’s failure in regards to the genocide in Africa, not for North Korea, not for China, not for Iran and not for the United Nations itself, but for the United States. What a surprise, huh?

Hans Blix has publicly condemned the Untied States by claiming that Iraq is a complete failure and that the country is worse off than under the brutal rule of Saddam Hussein. (
IOL) Former United Nations chief weapons inspector Hans Blix on Wednesday described the United States-led invasion of Iraq as a "pure failure" that had left the country worse off than under the rule of Saddam Hussein. "Iraq is a pure failure," he was quoted as saying… Blix said the situation would have been better if the war had not taken place. "Saddam would still have been sitting in office. Okay, that is negative and it would not have been joyful for the Iraqi people. But what we have gotten is undoubtedly worse," he was quoted as saying.

Living under Saddam Hussein (one of the worst tyrants in all of HISTORY) is simply… Okay, it's not too joyful? Is he kidding me with that dismissive bullshit!!! --
Fuck You! If you and the United Nations did your job and enforced the 17 resolutions directed at Iraq, this whole situation would not have taken place. Maybe if you guys weren’t busy doing nothing for Africa, electing Iran to the disarmament commission, placing Cuba and China on the Human Rights Council, legitimizing terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, and oh, don’t let me forget, propping up SADDAM HUSSEIN with the Oil for Food Scandal, the UN might be considered worth a damn.

According to Hans Blix’s logic, and much of the world, it was better to be dying brutally in acid baths, torture chambers and by chemical weapons under Saddam Hussein than it is dying in a struggle to establish a democratic and a more free country…

Stunning Admission From ABC News

Political Director Says Major Media is Too Liberal -Video-
ABC News has posted an article on their website that outlines the strategy of the " Old Media’s" plans to aid the Democrats in their effort to take control of the House and Senate this November. The article comes to us during the same time the BBC finally admitted that it is run by leftist anti-Americans and the admission of the ombudsmen for the NY Times that his newspaper needlessly outed government secrets to the public.

Watch for the strategies provided by ABC's The Note to be implemented (some already have been) and keep in mind that this outline comes not from Republicans but from the staff of ABC. There is no more denying that it (the left-leaning media) exists so I don’t expect any reaction from any Democrats that might happen upon this blog. They always tuck tail and hide when they know there are no more excuses to manufacture. Just take pleasure in knowing that we don’t have to see them struggle to find a way not to look stupid.

What Happened to Their Americanism?

CNN Defends Airing of Jihadi Video
In the past, America seemed to be on one side during war time- the side of supporting our troops to victory. It was a time in which the media came together and sent back true but patriotic images that rallied the American public; back when journalists looked for images like “Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima” to send home in hopes of raising our spirit. Unfortunately, that all changed when the media and the Opposition Party saw an opportunity to gain a voter base by attacking the administration at the expense of wanting to win and at the expense of the soldier himself.

This is clearly seen with the over hyping of the prisoner abuse “scandal” at Guantanamo Bay; when facts show that the US guards are the ones being attacked and being degraded on a daily basis. It was clearly seen when the Democrats compared the US military to Nazis, cold-blooded killers, the forces of Stalin, Pol Pot and Saddam Hussein.

And now we see CNN defending their airing of jihadi propaganda. If you’re not familiar with the story: CNN has been showing terrorist videos of US forces being shot by snipers in Iraq under the guise of it being in the public's interest to see the harshness of war (it’s really meant to further the discontent by this November, but I won't mention that). Thankfully, Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter has called out CNN for its use of such videos. He very effectively points out the weaknesses of Wolf Blitzer’s arguments and asked the glaring question: “Does CNN want America to win this thing”? -
Video-

It’s left up to good bloggers to support the troops and to provide us with favorable images (
like this story). -- The difference between people like Barack Obama, who claims it is the media's job to leak vital counterterrorism secrets to the public, and me; is that I believe that in a serious war time the American media has a responsibility, under precedent, to help the morale of their fellow countrymen. -- One side wants the media to leak Intel, disinterestedly aiding the enemy, and the other side wants the media to exercise responsibility while doing what they can to bolster the troops and the American people. Although I’m not asking the media to not report bad things… yeah, report on it. But just don’t revel in it.

The NY Times Mea Culpa

Wow, first the BBC admits to being a leftist rag (see post below) and now the NY Times admits to being traitors. Well, they didn’t admit to being traitors per say, but their ombudsmen did acknowledge it was a mistake to leak the SWIFT counterterrorism program run by the NSA.

My July 2 column strongly supported The Times’s decision to publish its June 23 article on a once-secret banking-data surveillance program. After pondering for several months, I have decided I was off base. There were reasons to publish the controversial article, but they were slightly outweighed by two factors to which I gave too little emphasis. While it’s a close call now, as it was then, I don’t think the article should have been published...

Those two factors are really what bring me to this corrective commentary: the apparent legality of the program in the United States, and the absence of any evidence that anyone’s private data had actually been misused… I haven’t found any evidence in the intervening months that the surveillance program was illegal under United States laws
.

Oh, so now he feels bad about the outing of a secret government program, which potentially aided our enemies in the war on terror, and was entirely LEGAL, . Great job asshole!

BBC Executives Admit Bias

I read the Daily Mail article last night but was too busy to post about it so I thought some, “yeah, no shit” news would be a welcomed Sunday treat. (Daily Mail) It was the day that a host of BBC executives and star presenters admitted what critics have been telling them for years: the BBC is dominated by trendy, Left-leaning liberals who are biased against Christianity and in favour of multiculturalism.

A leaked account of an 'impartiality summit' called by BBC chairman Michael Grade… reveals that executives would let the Bible be thrown into a dustbin on a TV comedy show, but not the Koran, and that they would broadcast an interview with Osama Bin Laden if given the opportunity. Further, it discloses that the BBC's 'diversity tsar', wants Muslim women newsreaders to be allowed to wear veils when on air.

At the secret meeting in London last month, which was hosted by veteran broadcaster Sue Lawley, BBC executives admitted the corporation is dominated by homosexuals and people from ethnic minorities, deliberately promotes multiculturalism, is anti-American, anti-countryside and more sensitive to the feelings of Muslims than Christians.

I wonder if those people, who despise Fox News for its perceived Republican slant, will be as outraged with the BBC for its admitted bias…? Although, that would mean hypocrisy is not the lifeblood of the far-left and would mean they disagree with groups who hate America, Christians and feel the US, not terrorism, is the biggest threat to global security; which, of course, is not the case.

Time Mag: Harman Under Investigation

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee is under investigation amid charges that she improperly used her connections to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in an illegal scheme to get reappointed to her leadership position.

(Time Exclusive) The Department of Justice is investigating whether Rep. Jane Harman and the pro-Israel group worked together to get her reappointed as the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee…

The case is a spin-off of a probe that has already led to charges under the Espionage Act against two AIPAC lobbyists, whose case is still pending… The sources say the probe also involves whether, in exchange for the help from AIPAC, Harman agreed to help try to persuade the Administration to go lighter on the AIPAC officials caught up in the ongoing investigation.

Side Note: Recently, as you may have read, it was
reported that the National Intelligence Estimate leak was perpetrated by a Democratic staffer from the House Intelligence Committee who was subsequently suspended and has been denied access to classified material. At the news of this person being suspended by Chairman Peter Hoekstra, Jane Harman expressed her dissatisfaction by demanding the immediate reinstatement of the leaker and claimed she was “Appalled” by the chairman’s actions.

Just today however, the LA Times has
reported that the Democratic staffer who leaked the NIE to the NY Times was in fact employed by the very same, Jane Harman. -- Isn't that interesting?

Teddy K and the KGB

Breaking: Kennedy Reached Out to the KGB to undercut Ronald Reagan -Story-
We have known for quite a while that the hatred for our current president by the Democrats has led them to undermine the war on terror and to support our enemies in their propaganda efforts: From leaking Intelligence to the NY Times, to leaking more Intelligence to the NY Times, to comparing the US military to Nazis, to voting against all necessary terrorist-fighting methods implemented by this administration, to personally attacking the military. But what we now know is that this type of enemy-enabling practice has gone on long before President Bush took office.

The antipathy that congressional Democrats have today toward President George W. Bush is reminiscent of their distrust of President Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, a political science professor says... In his book, which came out this week, Kengor focuses on a KGB letter written at the height of the Cold War that shows that Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) offered to assist Soviet leaders in formulating a public relations strategy to counter President Reagan's foreign policy and to complicate his re-election efforts.

Kennedy reached out to the Soviets in hopes to engage a propaganda effort that would unseat or undermine President Reagan… sound familiar? Sounds like the typical liberal treason to me.


Their misguided and ill advised hatred towards the necessary policies of the cold war led the Democrats, namely Kennedy, to devise plans that went against our national interest to damage the administration. With Dems currently leaking National Intelligence Estimates; CIA prison facilities and plane routes; the NY Times training for treason and outing banking programs; Barack Obama stating that disclosing vital secrets is the media’s job; John Kerry praising Democrat Mary McCarthy’s leak of the CIA black sites; and the ACLU doing what it does... it seems they have honed their skills. And it only goes to show how much we cannot trust these people.

Kos Clown Candidate 17pts Behind

The far-left internet folk have yet to realize that the American people just do not like them. No matter how many smears they try, no matter how many times they lie and paint Lieberman as being too close to George W. Bush, and no matter how dissatisfied people might be with our current situation, the fact remains… America can’t stand whiny piece-of-shit liberals.

HAMDEN, Conn. (AP) -- Sen. Joe Lieberman has built a 17-point lead over Democratic challenger Ned Lamont, according to the first Quinnipiac University poll since the two faced off in a debate this week.

Lieberman, running as an independent after losing the Aug. 8 Democratic primary to Lamont, leads the Greenwich businessman 52 percent to 35 percent among Connecticut likely voters in the poll released Friday. Republican Alan Schlesinger trailed with 6 percent, and 7 percent were undecided.

So, after all of that moonbat gusto to break the system from within and the nutroot campaign to rise up and fight back (or whatever other hippie mantra they like to use on their websites), it turns out it was all for not. It turns out that nonsensical Bush haters are really only successful when in an audience of nonsensical Bush haters. Now who’d a thought that?

Go back to your mother’s basement with your tinfoil hats and Greenday lunchboxes. Nobody likes you.

It’s The Economy, Dumbshit

I’m not an economist but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night. And with that expertise I have come to the conclusion that the Dow Jones Industrial Average continuing to break records, the latest being the Dow passing 12,000 for the first time in all of HISTORY, is a very good thing for this "horrible" economy.

Despite the internet bubble burst, the Clinton recession, 9/11, two wars and several huge corporate scandals, almost 7 million jobs have been created since August 2003. The unemployment rate is still at a low 4.6 percent. In the past year 48 states registered employment growth. The Dow has broken through to historic highs and all time highs… so has the S&P 500. The economy is growing faster than any European nation. The Housing Market is still booming. Gas prices are continuing to fall throughout the country. And overall homeownership is at record levels… including minority homeowners

Interestingly, I scanned the major liberal websites and guess what news went without mention?

America Is Tony Montana

Bear with me on this one... Some of the very same countries that have condemned the United States and demanded we close the Guantanamo Bay prison facility are the same assholes who are now impeding the release of some of those prisoners.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Britain and other U.S. allies have demanded closure of the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but have also blocked efforts to let some prisoners return home, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

British officials recently rejected a U.S. offer to transfer 10 former British residents from Guantanamo to the United Kingdom, arguing that it would be too expensive to keep them under surveillance, the newspaper said, citing documents made public this month in London.

They attack us for holding these terrorists indefinitely but don’t want them freed because they are dangerous and the authorities haven’t the will to spend the money to track them after they are released! -- This brings me to the Tony Montana analogy and the classic line from Scarface:

You need people like me [the US]. You need people like me so you can point your fuckin' fingers, and say "that's the bad guy." So, what'll that make you? Good? You're not good. You just know how to hide, how to lie. Me, I don't have that problem. Me, I always tell the truth... even when I lie. -- We’re the bad guy living in the real world doing the dirty work while Europe is the hypocritical phony sipping his champagne, pointing fingers

The Latest Liberal Lunacy

As predicted, the Democrats and some in the media have advanced the theory that President Bush used his oil connections to plummet the price of gasoline to help the Republicans re-election hopes in November. For many people on the left, the cost of oil has decreased not because the end of summer and less demand, but because George Bush asked his oil friends to help him and his fellow politicians avoid political disaster.

Obviously, it doesn’t make sense but that’s what they believe. And since some people feel so strongly about this position I thought I would point out how stupid their belief is.


According to liberal logic, Bush has the power to manipulate gas prices, right? At the very least, that’s what the conspiracy theory implies. So, I would like to get this lunacy straight; with reality as a reference: President Bush’s plan (as deduced by the theory) was to allow the increase in the price of gasoline to reach record highs over the past year, which hurt his poll numbers and hurt the GOP, but at the last minute, lessen the price in order to rebound his popularity for a net gain of approximately -4 percentage points…? Yeah, that makes sense if you’re a liberal.

Memo to the Retarded Left: If President Bush had the ability to lower gas prices at will, he would have never allowed oil to reach 72$ a barrel. Logically, if you believe that the fall at the pumps is directly connected to the midterm elections, you have to accept a reality in which astute politicians are willing to commit political suicide over a period of years and “greedy” oil corporations are willing to lose billions of dollars in profit. (That’s the type of common sense that has to be explained to liberals… or else they won’t get it)

SEAL Takes Grenade for Comrades

Coronado, Calif. A Navy SEAL sacrificed his life to save his comrades by throwing himself on top of a grenade Iraqi insurgents tossed into a sniper hideout his unit had discovered, fellow members of the elite force said… Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael A. Monsoor had been near the only door to the rooftop structure Sept. 29 when the grenade hit him in the chest and bounced to the floor.

"He never took his eye off the grenade, his only movement was down toward it," said a 28-year-old lieutenant who sustained shrapnel wounds to both legs that day. "He undoubtedly saved mine and the other SEALs' lives, and we owe him."


We owe him and those like him everything. Our gratitude, our respect, our love and our understanding. To see a grenade land at your feet and to instantly make the decision to save your friends lives by smothering it with your own body is heroism beyond anything I can imagine. Unfortunately heroic acts like this are overshadowed by a constant barrage of military-bashing by some in the media and those of a particular political party. Cold blooded Nazis they are not… warriors they are. Thanks from those who appreciate you.



In Contrast: French Commandos Surrender in Afghanistan Amid Security Fears. French Special Forces tracking Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan have been ordered home by President Jacques Chirac because of the "worsening security situation," Britain's Daily Telegraph newspaper reported yesterday. According to unnamed military sources, Mr. Chirac gave the go-ahead during a defence counsel meeting to pull the men out of the country… the troops were badly shaken by the recent death of nine members during a mission.

Mother Uses Infant As Weapon

We know the world has gone to shit when a mother of an infant baby grabs her child by its feet and uses him as a club against her boyfriend. (Associated Press) Chytoria Graham's children have been taken from her by authorities -- except for 4-week-old Jarron. He is in a hospital after a horrific event that has stunned police and prosecutors, and prompted strangers who read about him to offer to adopt the boy: Authorities say she grabbed the infant by his feet and swung him, hitting her boyfriend and fracturing the baby's skull.

"Unfortunately, I have seen child abuse cases upfront," said Capt. Frank Kwitowski, a 20-year Erie police officer. "But this is the first time I've seen a child actually picked up and used as a weapon."


Some psychiatrists are pondering the possibility that mental issues or postpartum depression played a large role in this incident. The mother, if you can call her that, claimed she was drinking that night and just “snapped” when she got into an argument with her boyfriend. To me, it’s all the same. Nothing can justify such behavior and actions like this rarely occur without the perpetrator having some kind of mental problems.

The child is in a medically induced coma at the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburg. The mother has been charged with aggravated assault, endangering the welfare of children, simple assault and reckless endangerment.

Professor: Bush is Hitler, Only Dumber

Meet the jackass that makes Ward Churchill look like a qualified and well intentioned professor. University of Wisconsin-Madison instructor Kevin Barrett teaches a course on the religion and culture of Islam. It is his contention that George W. Bush, the President of the United States, planned and executed 9/11 in an effort to establish a neocon dictatorship. He compared this action to the power grab of the Nazi party in 1933.

From his essay in the book, “9/11 and American Empire”: "Like Bush and the neocons, Hitler and the Nazis inaugurated their new era by destroying an architectural monument and blaming its destruction on their designated enemies," he wrote.

Barrett said Tuesday he was comparing the attacks to the burning of the German parliament building, the Reichstag, in 1933, a key event in the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship. "That's not comparing them as people, that's comparing the Reichstag fire to the demolition of the World Trade Center, and that's an accurate comparison that I would stand by," he said.
-Story-

Except, he went on to praise Hitler for his IQ level at the expense of George Bush. "Hitler had a good 20 to 30 IQ points on Bush, so comparing Bush to Hitler would in many ways be an insult to Hitler." And we don’t want to insult Hitler now do we… he was such a good guy. I’m guessing Barrett voted for Kerry who happened to receive worse grades than Bush did at Yale. Go figure.

But I digress. Three essays in the book “9/11 and American Empire” are required reading for his students. Although Kevin Barrett’s insane writing is not among those required, another essay entitled “A Clash between Justice and Greed” is on the list. This piece happens to argue that the “conflicts between Islam and the western world were made up after the ‘collapse of the Soviet Union to justify U.S. defense spending, and to provide a pretext of controlling the world's resources.’” Sometimes it’s hard to imagine that these people are out there… and they are teaching your children.

Dirty Harry 'Violates Senate Rules'

Harry Reid, the Senate Minority leader who coined the phrase "culture of corruption" has been caught by the Associated Press making unethical transactions with some of his mafia connected friends in an effort to acquire $1.1 million in a shady property deal.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years... The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations…

The senator didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land… The complex dealings allowed Reid to transfer ownership, legal liability and some tax consequences to Brown's company without public knowledge, but still collect a seven-figure payoff nearly three years later… Kent Cooper, of the Federal Election Commission, said Reid's failure to report the 2001 sale and his ties to Brown's company violated Senate rules.


I vaguely remember Harry Reid saying something In January amid the Culture of Corruption charges he and his fellow Democrats leveled against Republicans. What was it that he said? Oh, Yeah: “The idea of Republicans reforming themselves is like asking John Gotti to clean up organized crime… Democrats will lead the tough reforms, because we owe it to the American people to stand up for their interests over special interests. -- Good ole Harry. Leading the American people by example.

Hollywood Producer Mocks Democrats

Long time Democrat and Hollywood producer David Zucker slams the Democratic Party in the newly released campaign video posted by Matt Drudge. The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained an exclusive copy of a "scary" campaign advertisement created by Hollywood producer and director David Zucker that was intended to be used by GOP organizations in the closing weeks of the 2006 campaign. However, the advertisement was deemed "too hot" by GOP strategists all across Washington, DC who have refused to use it!

Zucker is the producer and director of comedies such as "Airplane" and "The Naked Gun." In 2004, Zucker, a longtime Democrat, embraced the Republican Party based on concerns he had about national security issues and voted for President George W. Bush.


Zucker points out the fact that Madeline Albright actually presented Kim Jong Il with an autographed basketball of Michael Jordan in an effort to kiss the dictators ass and it shows the former secretary of state singing kumbaya with terrorists -- As Terry Bradshaw would say, “Now that’s funny”.

The Final Chapter: Ortiz vs. Shamrock

Later today on Spike TV we will see the “Final Chapter” between the worlds’s most dangerous man, Ken Shamrock and Mr. Tito Ortiz. After I spent 50 bucks a couple of months ago to watch their highly anticipated rematch on Pay Per View and was gypped by an early stoppage from the Octagon referee, I’ve been waiting in a state of pistoffidness for their third fight. Luckily, UFC President Dana White decided to give the fans a break and air the live rematch on cable television instead of PPV.


I’m hoping Ken Shamrock beats the shit out of Tito Ortiz. Although, Tito is in his prime and has a great chance of winning the fight. As long as the ref doesn’t fuck up the fight again… I’ll be psyched. So don’t forget to set your reminder to Spike TV tonight!

Spoiler: the legendary Ken Shamrock is quickly defeated by Tito Ortiz.

Are These People Stupid? Part 2

In mid-May I posted on the situation in Iran and I pointed out the hypocrisy the Democrats were practicing in terms of their calls for a direct dialogue between Washington and Tehran. After the recent nuclear weapons test conducted by North Korea, I’m forced, once again, to point out that hypocrisy.

Already we have seen many in the Democratic Party and many of their operatives (like Richard Clarke) falsely blaming the current North Korea problem on President Bush’s refusal to engage in pointless one-on-one talks. Putting aside the fact that one-on-one negotiations and deal-making under the Clinton Administration is what, in large part, allowed Kim Jong Il to build nuclear weapons in the first place, I’ll focus more on their past election mantra.

During the 2004 campaign the same Democrats who are now recklessly demanding the United States of America disengage from the complex multilateral talks with North Korea, are the same Democrats who reprimanded President Bush for his “unilateral” foreign policy objectives in Iraq. And not only are they calling for a unilateral approach but they are actually pretending as if they would have supported some type of serious military intervention to stop the North Koreans from expanding their weapons capability.

The lack of direct negotiation has nothing to do with our current situation. Any website or any politician who claims that it does is obviously ignorantly mistaken or they’re partisan hacks and should not be taken seriously.

Jon Stewart for President?

The Comedy Central clown is beginning to dispel rumors that he and Stephen Colbert are gearing up for a 2008 White House run. A campaign movement, if you will, of retards has sprung up like a rank mushroom from the dog shit that is the liberal-internet folk. NEW YORK — Those people wearing "Stewart/Colbert '08" T-shirts can stop hoping — Comedy Central's fake news stars have no intention of making a run for the White House.

Jon Stewart said the T-shirts promoting him and Stephen Colbert "are a real sign of how sad people are" with the state of affairs in the country. "Nothing says 'I am ashamed of you my government' more than 'Stewart/Colbert '08,' Stewart told an audience Sunday at the New Yorker Festival.

No Jon. People wanting you and Stephen Colbert to run for President is not a sign of how sad people are with the state of the nation. It’s a sign of how fucking stupid the people who enjoy your show can really be. You know who I'm talking about... the audience that you garner; the people who clap at the most nonsensical, idiotic talking points and overused jokes you and your staff of Democratic cocksuckers hash out.

And for the people who have actually purchased or sport a Stewart/Colbert 08 badge on your website or on your person… do the world a favor and shoot yourself in the face. You fuckin’ douchebag.

Deal or No Deal for Kim Jong IL

Other than Kim Jong IL winning the Nobel peace prize and the Useless Nations appointing them to the Disarmament Commission, what would happen if North Korea actually tested a nuclear weapon?

It has been reported that North Korea is planning to test a nuclear device as early as the next few days. The White House has publicly and privately urged their government not to do so but those wishes are likely to be ignored. News of this test comes shortly after North Korea tested its first ever long range missile system. A system capable of striking US targets on the West Coast.

A nuclear ready Korean peninsula is a direct threat to our allies in the region and to the United States of America. Past dealings with their tyrant leader under the previous administration allowed for this dictatorship to acquire Weapons of Mass Destruction. So, any prospect of negotiations or dealings has to be met with the obvious skepticism. Sanctions are definitely not going to be effective and we should not expect any real assistance from the People’s Republic of China.

We can’t really invade North Korea and we can’t ask them nicely to be a peaceful nation. we can use tactical nuclear strikes to destroy large portions of their country and their military capability before their technology allows for an efficient retaliation against Japan or South Korea. But some people will argue, to let them have their weapons because they ignorantly think that irrational dictators somehow become more stable and responsible when sitting on nuclear weapons.

We saw that ridiculous argument with Iran especially from people in Europe and liberals here in America. They argued that Iran would never use their nuclear weapons because it would be suicide; they would be destroyed. Of Course, they conveniently forgot, or maybe never really understood, that crazed Islamic Extremists are prone to suicide and would gladly risk their lives and their country to kill as many infidels as possible. And they are also too dumb to understand that it doesn’t necessarily have to be the Iranian government themselves who launch an attack on, let’s say, Israel but it would be the nuclear material and weaponry the terrorist-state passes on to it’s terrorist branches.

With that being said we need real discussion about this situation and real action must be taken. I’m not sure what that action is but I am sure that the situations we find ourselves in with regard to Iran and North Korea are due to the complete failures of past administrations. Let's try not to make the same mistakes...Although it's a little late. North Korea has nuclear weapons and Iran is quickly advancing their weapons program. I guess the moral of the story is: Avoiding conflict which results in our enemies acquiring WMD, is not a very good foreign policy.


Update, 11:35pm: North Korea claims
successful nuclear test. Also: The fringe-left is already blaming Bush and pretending they would have supported a war against North Korea. It's Pathetic.

Favorite Seagal and Van Damme Movies

Favorite Steven Segal Movies
1) number one has to be Under Siege
2) Out For Justice.
3) On Deadly Ground


Favorite Jean Claude Van Damme Movies
1) Timecop
2) Universal Soldier
3) Lion Heart

The best line from Under Siege: Yes, of course! Hence the name: movement. It moves a certain distance, then it stops, you see? A revolution gets its name by always coming back around in your face. You tried to kill me you son of a bitch... so welcome to the revolution.

But do you remember Ms. July ’89, the girl that jumps out of the birthday cake naked and becomes Casey Ryback’s sidekick? Well, now she’s on NBC’s the Biggest Loser. Yeah, she got a little heavy


From Jean Claude’s movies I always liked "Timecop". One of my favorite parts was when a thief travels back in time to the Civil War in order hijack a gold shipment from the Confederate Army. The six guys on horses guarding the carriage, armed with civil war era weapons, dismiss the one man demanding their gold because they outnumber him. Little do they know that in his trench coat is a hi-tech machine gun. Needless to say, he kills them all very easily. -check out the trailer-

Protesters Attack Minutemen Founder

Here we go again; another case of the far-left attacking people with whom they disagree. During his speech, Jim Gilchrist co-founder of the Minuteman Project was attacked by a mob of enraged liberals carrying open-border signs claiming that “No one is ever illegal”. I’m not even sure what that means but according to a campus magazine some of the “protesters” rushed the stage and prompted fist-fights between several people.

(
New York Sun) Students stormed the stage at Columbia University's Roone auditorium yesterday, knocking over chairs and tables and attacking Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minutemen, a group that patrols the border between America and Mexico. Mr. Gilchrist and Marvin Stewart, another member of his group, were in the process of giving a speech at the invitation of the Columbia College Republicans. They were escorted off the stage unharmed and exited the auditorium by a back door.

Shockingly, when Mr. Stewart was speaking, some of the activists interrupted him and began calling him a racist and a black white supremacist (yeah, that really doesn't make sense). They interrupted Mr. Stewart, who is African-American, when he referred to the Declaration of Independence's self-evident truth that "All men are created equal," calling him a racist, a sellout, and a black white supremacist. -video of incident below-

It’s another crowning achievement of the education students receive from places like Columbia University. It’s funny how these types of protesters go ballistic, slander people, interrupt events, throw food at speakers, prevent people from exercising their first amendment right to free speech, throw chairs in incoherent tirades, carry signs of complete misguided hate, belong to extremist groups like the International Socialist Organization and the Chicano Caucus, and yet call the organization that is peacfully giving a sophisticated speech, a bunch of Nazi racists.

It’s almost as ironic as Muslims who call for beheadings and who kill people in order to protest the Pope’s critique of the violence in Islam.

While the Dems are Busy with Foley

We have: Genocide in Africa; North Korea planning a nuclear test; Iran refusing to give up its weapons program; the economy doing great with the Dow at record highs; classified Intel leaks still hurting our country; John Murtha acting shady in the new Abscam video; Gas Prices falling; ABC confirming thousands of Americans have been saved by thwarted terrorists plots. And yet, all the left seems to care about is the over hyped Mark Foley email story.

I guess it’s just Democrats being Democrats. When the country and the world is at stake, we can always count on them to keep up the whining and partisan bickering. By the way, it looks like the
Liberal-Outrage Meter has not been fixed.

We Saved Europe. Why Not Africa?

That is the question posed in a Washington Post editorial written by Susan Rice, Anthony Lake, and Donald M. Payne. Given the situation in Africa, the remaining options to stop or stem the current genocide are limited to really only military force. However, this necessary action has yet to be implemented by the United Nations. The failed negotiation and lack of action on the part of the UN has led the authors of this article, Susan Rice, an advisor to the Kerry-Edwards campaign, Anthony Lake, former national security advisor under Bill Clinton, and Donald Payne a Democratic representative from New Jersey, to call for unilateral military intervention on the part of the United States.

With Darfur set to be hit by a second wave of genocide, world leaders are shifting into diplomatic high gear -- Some 450,000 innocent human beings are already dead, and more than 2.5 million have fled their homes... After three years of fruitless negotiation and feckless rhetoric, it's time to go beyond unenforced U.N. resolutions to a new kind of resolution: the firm resolve to act.

Will world leaders continue to give the perpetrators of genocide a veto over international action to stop it? the answer seems to be yes -- History demonstrates that there is one language Khartoum understands: the credible threat or use of force. After Sept. 11, 2001, when President Bush issued a warning to states that harbor terrorists, Sudan suddenly began cooperating on counterterrorism. It's time to get tough with Sudan again… If the United States fails to gain U.N. support, we should act without it.


Interesting parallels don’t you think? A UN unwilling to act; the world turning a blind eye, genocide allowed to reign, and the only language a maniac understands is “the credible threat or use of force”. In all honesty, I wish the world had the will and the moral conviction to come together and fight against situations like the one in Darfur. Unfortunately, the world community is so consumed with anti-American hatred and pro-appeasing pacifists that no matter how many people are slaughtered, the use of the American military is thought to be abhorrent and unacceptable. Between allowing the ongoing mass slaughter of hundreds of thousands of people or the United States using force to stop or stem the genocide, the hypocritical “world community” would rather allow the killing to continue.

At this point in time there is the reality and then there is the United Nations. The reality: Half a million people have been murdered with 2.5 million fleeing their homes. And the United Nations: “what can we do that makes it seem like we are trying to do something when in reality we are simply trying to avoid actually doing anything". Besides, the UN is too busy putting China and Cuba on their human rights commission, attacking the US, dismissing Hezbollah, while legitimizing leaders like Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad… we can’t bother them with tiny matters like brutal carnage.