HRW Whines Over ‘Disappeared’ Terrorists

Human Rights Watch, with furious anger, is tearing up their monkey cages over a few Al Qaeda operatives who might have been disappeared. According to HRW, some of their poor freedom-fighters have vanished from secret CIA prisons located in Europe and have yet to be found. As you can imagine, they’re none too happy about it.

( Human Rights Watch said Tuesday it had written to President George W. Bush about 38 'ghost prisoners' not heard from since secret CIA jails were emptied last year. The advocacy group also unveiled a report it said provided an unprecedented glimpse into grim conditions at the jails set up to hold top Al-Qaeda suspects captured on the battlefields of the war on terror.

"The Bush administration needs to provide a full accounting of everyone who was 'disappeared' into CIA prisons, including their names, locations and when they left US custody," said Joanne Mariner, Human Rights Watch (HRW) terrorism and counterterrorism director.

In the letter to Bush, the group mentioned names of 16 people it believes were held at CIA prisons and whose current whereabouts were unknown. It also included a list of another 22 who may have been at CIA prisoners, who are also unaccounted for. HRW said it was concerned the United States may have transferred some missing prisoners to foreign jails where they remain under the CIA's effective control.

Oh, the poor wittle jihadis have gone missing? How sad... -Seriously though: the next time remind me to care if the CIA disappears some goat-humping terrorist. Because I would really love to know when to start my grieving process.

Go Go Gadget-Jihadi-Grief

The Beer Launching Fridge

Imagine sitting on your favorite Laz-E-Boy and thinking to yourself, “I need another beer”. And then imagine how great it would be if you didn’t have to actually get up in order to get another one.

I Definitely Want One

Have you ever gotten up off the couch to get a beer for the umpteenth time and thought, "What if instead of ME going to get the BEER, the BEER came to ME???" Well, that was how I first conceived of the beer launching fridge. About 3 months and several hundred dollars later I have a fully automated, remote controlled, catapulting, man-pit approved, beer launching mini-fridge. It holds 10 beers in its magazine with 14 more in reserve to store a full case... -Video-

You Damn Dirty Dems!

Just when you might think it’s impossible for the Democratic Party to get any more partisan, they remind us all that when it comes to politics they are willing to do just about anything.

I would call them wolves in sheep's clothing but they’re more like a bunch of apes flinging poo...

All Headline News) In a yet another effort to topple President Bush's strategy on Iraq, the Democrats are now reportedly working on a binding legislation that would annul the 2002 Iraq war Resolution. According to officials, the new measure would limit the U.S. troops' mission to training their Iraqi counterparts, police forces, securing the country's borders and combating al-Qaeda forces.

What an amazing evolution from the Dems humble beginnings of calling the troops Nazis and the forces of Stalin. They have certainly come a long way

It started with undying support for the war, to slander of the Bush administration, to slander of the military, to undermining the war effort, then to the outing of intelligence secrets, and finally to an all-out effort to stab the troops in the back... all in the hope of gaining, politically.

You Thought The NAMBLA Thing Was Bad

The former head of the Virginia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, Charles Rust-Tierney, has been arrested in a huge child porn investigation undertaken by I.C.E. with support from Interpol and other Intel services. Some of the videos obtained at Mr. Rust-Tierney’s home included footage of the forcible rape of underage females; some of whom were recorded screaming in agony.

According to a criminal complaint obtained by ABC News, Rust-Tierney allegedly used his e-mail address and credit card to subscribe to and access a child pornography website.

The videos described in the complaint depict graphic forcible intercourse with prepubescent females. One if the girls is described in court documents as being "seen and heard crying", another is described as being "bound by rope." -Full Story Here-

-I’m not going to use this story to point out the ACLU’s support for child molesters or their long history of sympathizing with such behavior, because I have yet to hear from them and I best not jump the gun. But
Ace said it best in his post:

The only bad thing about this arrest is now we're going to have endure the round-the-clock coverage of this, and the media's turning pedophilia into a political issue, the same way they did with Mark Foley... On Bizarro Earth, I mean. Here, no problems. Last time you'll hear of it.

Very well said (I guess that’s why he’s one of my favorite bloggers). The Mark Foley issue pales in comparison to this type of behavior, so it will be interesting to see how far the mainstream media will go to either, sweep this under the rug, or how far they’ll go in an effort to separate the individual from the ACLU (Not as if they gave the military such a gift with regard to isolated abuse cases; they're all Nazis, remember).

Update, 2/25: The Media Is Silent. I'm shocked!

What You Won’t Find on Lefty Sites

Iran continues enrichment; defies UN.
North Korea actually invites UN to discuss disarmament.
The Dow continues to set records.
Iran Vows not to weaken weapons program.
Prince Harry Excited to Fight in Iraq.
Illegal Immigrant Kills Cop (this story is from last year. -he's taking jobs Americans don't want... killing cops)

But you will find the all-important Bush-bashing. Because when it comes to important things going on in the world... if it can't be used to attack the military, Republicans, or George Bush, it won't be a concern of the far-left. In fact, in terms of Iran, the only concern they seem to have is that the United States has, in their possession, war plans. Go figure...

War Plans = Bad
Iran developing nukes = No big deal

Does God Exist?

With hopes of avoiding a religious debate (I think some of my return readers understand my feeling on organized religion) I’d like to express my thoughts, in a condensed way, on the subject.

When I think about the possibility of there being a "God" (not necessarily in a religious context; it’s just easier to use that phrase), I try to think about it from a logical perspective. For example, I break the belief down to a basic question.

You have to ask yourself which is more likely: At some point, for no real reason, something created itself from absolute nothingness or something has always existed and that something created what we know.

In my opinion, it is more likely that something has always existed, in some form, rather than the concept that everything we know, as reality, just decided to materialize itself from nothing. In order to believe that the existence of "God" is a complete lie, you have to, in turn, accept the fact that every universe, in every dimension, came into existence for no reason.

To me, that doesn’t make sense. A supreme being doesn’t make too much sense either, but I have to conclude that it is far more likely. Perhaps the premise of my question is all wrong... but I don’t think it is. In the very end of all the debate, it comes down to whether you believe that something as complex as reality can create itself from nothingness. I'm not willing to take that leap...

Shock: The Clintons Lie with Ease?

David Geffen, a former Bill Clinton supporter and moneyman (who now supports Obama), has come out with a scathing attack directed at the Hillary campaign. Geffen has called the Clintons' unwillingness to stand up for what they believe in and their ability to lie with ease, 'troubling'.

-But this can’t be! The Clintons can't be liars... they’ve never lied in their lives.
Say it ain’t so, Bill and Hill... say it ain’t so.

They [Bill and Geffen] fell out in 2000, when Mr. Clinton gave a pardon to Marc Rich after rebuffing Mr. Geffen’s request for one for Leonard Peltier. “Marc Rich getting pardoned? An oil-profiteer expatriate who left the country rather than pay taxes or face justice?” Mr. Geffen says. “Yet another time when the Clintons were unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in. Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”

This leads me to the question: Hillary or Obama? Currently, the obamanator is sweet-talking the Hollywood left and the hildabeast
ain’t too happy with it. Her former pals, Clooney and Streisand, look to be abandoning her for the more youthful half-blackie. But is that a smart move?

I would have to argue, no; it’s not a smart move on the part of the left to dump Hill. Actually, I have to say that neither move can be considered brilliant... it’s basically support a candidate that will surely be defeated in Hillary or support a candidate that looks ‘cuter’ but still has no real chance to win the presidency. I guess we can’t be surprised if Hollywood goes for the flavor of the month, now can we?

So what are the Dems to do? -I don't know, but It seems that everyone who knows the Clintons ends up hating them or ends up dead. Barack might need to watch out for those elevator shafts because he might fall onto some bullets.

Man Attacks Shark

I can’t really add to this, except to say: hooray vodka!

An Australian man reportedly attacked a shark with his bare hands after drinking copious amounts of vodka and deciding to turn the tables on one of nature's deadliest predators.

Kerkhof became annoyed when the shark began chasing his squid lures and said he climbed down a ladder into the water and silently stalked the 1.3 metre (4.3 foot) predator.

"I just snuck up behind him and eventually I went for the big grab and I fluked it and got him," he said. "It's not something I'd recommend to do. When I sobered up I thought about it and I said, 'I'm a bit of an idiot doing it'."

The Killjoys Are Everywhere

After the big brew-haha over the Washington Redskins, I expected some backlash from the American public. Unfortunately, I was let down and the pitiful PC Police have struck again... this time in Illinois.

URBANA, Ill. — The University of Illinois will retire its 81-year-old American Indian mascot, Chief Illiniwek, following the last men's home basketball game of the season Wednesday.

The NCAA in 2005 deemed the buckskin-clad Illiniwek an offensive use of American Indian imagery and barred the university from hosting post-season events.

I understand that some people, including Indian groups, find a full-fledged Indian mascot somewhat offensive. However, I do not find such tributes offensive because I believe they are, just that... tributes. Being from the Southwest I naturally have some Indian blood in me and I'm friends with families who are native American. So I can speak from a somewhat relevant perspective.

The issue is similar to the confederate flag issue in that it represents a horrible point in American history, yet it is still an important part of American history.

I see an Indian mascot and I see strength, honor, and courage; Which is embodied in many sports teams, namely the Atlanta Braves (with the tomahawk chop). Other people see an Indian mascot and see mockery, oppression, slaughter, and greed.

The point is: many Americans understand the plight of the Indian people and respect them for it. Others see their plight and feel nothing but contempt for their own country. -I’m here to tell you that when we do the tomahawk chop or celebrate the Illiniwek, we do it out of respect and out of the knowledge that if we aspire to have the character of our native people, it gives us (the team) strength. But when people, out of political correctness, use the respect for our past to change this country from one of understanding to a, "make everyone feel comfortable" society, it bothers me.

Whatever happened to just being able to have a good time? What's next, huh? No more candy at the movies because diabetics might be offended? Or no more beer at sporting events because some people might be recovering alcoholics.

A Word to the Wise

Hating liberals doesn’t make me a right-winger. It only means I’m smart


NYT on N. Korea Deal: What Took So Long

It didn’t take long for the handwringing about the recent disarmament deal to begin from the New York Times. In the typical display of complete left-wing hackery, the Times released an op-ed full of fabrications and the always lackluster condescension for which we’ve become so accustomed.

What took so long”, is the questioned posed by the editorial. The obvious question to ask is: What took so long? And even more important: Will President Bush learn from this belated success? Will he finally allow his diplomats to try negotiation and even compromise with other bad and undeniably dangerous governments?

What took so long for the complicated, multilateral negotiations to work? The editorial calls it the “obvious” question but I call it the predictable question given that I predicted the exact wording last week in a comment posted at Hot Air. But I digress... shall we answer the obvious question with some obvious answers...? Or am I to assume the question was merely asked as a way to downplay the situation and/or blame the administration?

Let’s see: A) North Korea was busy testing its nuclear weapons. B) Kim-Jong-Il is an unstable maniac. C) These were complex negotiations involving countries like China. And D) this isn't a swapping of baseball cards between two kids... this is potential nuclear war, the starvation of tens of thousands, and a matter of positioning with a credible threat of serious consequences.

But that wasn’t the only stupid question as you can see. In the same paragraph the Times piece asked: Will he finally allow his diplomats to try negotiation and even compromise with other bad and undeniably dangerous governments?

How do you like that false premise, huh?. The insinuation is that Iran hasn’t been offered any compromises or hasn’t been negotiated with. We all know that isn’t true. Iran has been offered plenty of incentives and has had ample opportunity to take advantage of UN and Western compromises. -I think the author is trying to say that as long as Iran pinkie-promises not to develop nukes we should let them continue its nuclear program... maybe I'm wrong.

But according to the NYT, the lack of negotiation is not Iran’s fault, it’s Bush’s fault: As for the lessons to be learned, there are a lot of other bad actors out there with whom Mr. Bush is still refusing to speak. Iran is resisting the White House’s saber rattling and bullying.

So we should stop being mean to the Iranian government (a government that is building nuclear weapons, supporting global terrorism, and a country providing sophisticated weaponry to Iraqi insurgents which is killing Americans) becuse if we're less mean... They won't want to wipe out the Jews, they'll stop supporting terrorism and they'll forget about their nuclear ambitions?

Bush Directs Tornado to Hit New Orleans

Yes, after George Bush planted bombs in the WTC, conjured and coordinated with the forces of global warming to flood the black neighborhoods of New Orleans, he has now, with the help of Karl Rove, dealt the victims of Katrina another blow with a round of deadly tornadoes!

All Headline News) - One person was killed and at least 29 were injured in the tornadoes that swept through the New Orleans area yesterday. At least 50 FEMA trailers and dozens of homes were destroyed and many others were damaged in an area that is still struggling to recover from Hurricane Katrina.

According to a preliminary report from the National Weather Service, New Orleans experienced two tornadoes, both of them F-2 storms with winds of 113 to 158 per hour.

Damn you Bush! Do you really hate black people that much? -The imperialistic America that this president and his master Cheney have created will stop at nothing to further its neooppressive constraints on what is now a police-state with certain designs of the complete abhorrent goal of systematic weather-killing of the black populace!

So Now They Decide to Shut it Down

The Iraqi government has decided to close it’s border with both Iran and Syria. The move is part of the last-ditch effort to quell the extreme violence in the hopes of establishing security throughout Iraq.

-A little late, ain't it?

Securing the borders of Iraq... That sounds so familiar. Oh, right.
Send More Troops (2005)”:

I am growing weary of the situation in Iraq... I’m very tired of having to read about US service people being killed... There are three major priorities that need to be taken care of: First, should be training and equipping the new Iraqi Army. The second priority, which is not being handled, is securing the borders of Iraq... Priority # 2 has not been seriously addressed by the administration. IEDs are the main killer of US troops. And those IEDs have been brought across the Syrian and Iranian borders. Hell, actual terrorists are being funneled through these borders. Nothing is being done about that! Priority # 3 is safety and security. Of course you can’t have safety and security if the Iraqis aren’t trained and Iraq’s borders are open for insurgents and weaponry to flow freely.
It wasn't hard to figure out what was going to happen if we left the borders open to virtually every enemy of the United States; at least not for me. But only now, when we're about to lose, are they doing what should have been done in 2005. -Great job everyone! Maybe after I die I'll remember to brush my teeth more often.

Obama: 3000 Lives Have Been Wasted in Iraq

The more and more Barack Obama is filmed the more his true political nature is exposed for the world to see.

It is his contention that the United States of America has been wasting lives in Iraq because he feels we launched a war that “should have never been authorized and should have never been waged”.

Obama on Iraq: 3000 of Our Bravest Have Been Wasted

video linked at LGF
It’s the typical nonsensical rhetoric given that his colleagues did in fact authorize this war, the war continues to wage and Saddam Hussein violated 17 Security Council resolutions. It’s not a serious point of debate nor is it constructive. So please Obama, if you think you should be president, start acting like it and stop acting like a moron who is simply trying to placate an insane political base.

But a word of advice if you choose not to be a serious candidate: The far-left in the Democratic Party doesn’t want to hear you call our American forces brave... Mercenaries maybe, but not brave.

North Korea Agrees to Disarm

Breaking: The United States envoy has said that North Korea has “tentatively” agreed to disarm their nuclear arsanel beginning in about a month.

The U.S. envoy to talks on North Korea's nuclear program said Tuesday that negotiators reached a tentative agreement on initial steps for the communist nation's disarmament.

Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill said the agreement outlined specific commitments for North Korea and would set up working groups to implement those goals to begin meeting in about a month. He declined to give other details.

Has the Bush administration, despite the ridiculous demands of the opposition party to ditch the complicated six-party negotiations, made a breakthrough with the Communitst dictatorship? If it’s true the mistake of the Clinton Administration to allow North Korea to develop such weapons has been corrected by President Bush.

We’ll see what happens.

SF State Outlaws Insulting Allah

One might wonder about that little thing we have in the United States called the Constitution. In it, there are certain rights and freedoms we, as Americans have that were, and continue to be, paid for in blood. And it’s those rights that this country was built on.

San Francisco has a long tradition of burning American flags, degrading Christian symbols, spitting on members of the US military and supporting anti-American agendas throughout the world. All protected by the constitution. However, if you take the free speech that they use to insult this country and use it to express your displeasure with terrorist organizations (or their beloved freedom-fighters) you'll be labeled a 'racist' and your freedom will be overridden.

National Review) You, of course, have a fundamental, constitutional, First Amendment, free-expression right to desecrate the American flag. But, evidently, not the flags of Hamas and Hezhollah. Not at least if you are at San Francisco State University and you are a College Republican.

The flags of these jihadists, you see, incorporate the word "Allah" in Arabic. By walking on them during a demonstration, Debra Saunders
reports in San Francisco Chronicle, the College Republicans are accused by a campus body of creating a hostile environment and potentially inciting violence.

Ah yes, those "San Francisco values." Does anyone know when the First Hundred Hours will end?

Can we all agree that we do have such a thing in this country that allows us to express ourselves without fear of prosecution? Do we? I don’t know, maybe I missed something, you tell me?. Because if that's truly the case, why on earth would those who preach such freedoms in the so called, “progressive” institutes of higher learning, be so quick to take away the rights of those with whom they disagree.

That last one is a rhetorical question because I think we all know that people on the far-left of the political spectrum are not tolerant of others and we know they care very little about the constitution when it comes to opinions that differ from theirs.

‘Distracting’ Laptops and the New Segregation

Students (me and some other guy) Forced to the Back of the Class
The other day, after one of my economics courses, I was confronted by a fairly tall young lady who had a problem with my use of the notebook computer I carry. Apparently, my computer was “distracting” her and because she “pays the same tuition I pay” I should not ‘distract’ her during class.

As you might imagine, I was caught slightly off-guard by her selfish request given that we are in college and not nine years of age. So the first thing I said was, “just look away”. I wouldn’t have had a problem with her if she understood what I was saying and left. But not this idiot. After I told her to look away, she became upset and threatened to, get this: “Tell the professor” on me.

I shit you not. She actually threatened to tattle on me to our economics professor. Anyway, after she said that, I naturally became a tad angry. Because first of all, this is the 21st century and it ain’t my fault morons like her aren’t up to date with certain advances in word processing and research. Furthermore, her being distracted like a cat chasing a laser light sounds awfully like a personal problem to me.

So, I told her, in no uncertain terms, to mind her own fuckin’ business. In fact, I said to her, “mind your own fuckin’ business”. Well, after I said that, her shoulders tensed up and her pretty little head snapped back like if she just got a whiff of that crazy astronauts diaper after the 900 mile trip.

After I said what I said, I just walked away. As I was leaving down the hall, I hear her say, in that snarky manner, Mind my own business?!? -She sounded as if no one has ever spoken to her that way before. But I let it go because I had other things to do and the poor girl wasn’t equipped to handle what I would have told her next.

The story doesn’t end there I’m afraid. This happened after the Tuesday class and we still had to meet for the Thursday class in the same week. I had pretty much forgotten about the entire incident until I walked through the door and my professor singled me out and said, "there was a disturbance the other day and it’s best if you sit in the back to use your computer”. - I thought to myself, there is no way she actually complained to the professor that her fragile little mind couldn’t help but be distracted by my laptop.

Oh, but she did. And now those taking the course who use computers for notes are all forced to sit in the back row. -- If I were George Clooney I would call myself the new Rosa Parks...

Pelosi’s Panties Have Bunched

Nancy Pelosi has demanded that the administration provide her special ass with a huge private jet during her time as Speaker of the House. A jet that dwarfs the previous speaker’s plane by 30 seats, a private bedroom, an entertainment center, and a state of the art communications system.

Corruption Chronicles) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants taxpayers to finance a lavish private jet large enough to ferry her and her entourage—including family members-- from coast-to-coast without stopping.

Pelosi is demanding the Pentagon provide her with a fancy jet that includes 42 business class seats, a fully-enclosed state room, an entertainment center, a private bed, a state-of-the-art communications system and a crew of 16. The aircraft must be large enough to make the cross-country trip from Washington D.C. to her San Francisco home without stopping to refuel.

Yes, Nancy Pelosi, the voice of the underprivileged and devout global warmer, is demanding, in her Armani suits, to be given a luxury jet to fly her and her family from Washington D.C. to her home state of California. She cites security concerns as the reason, which makes the demand for a bed and entertainment system all the more relevant... don’t you think?

Iraqi Lawmaker Is U.S. Embassy Bomber

Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, an Iraqi lawmaker and member of the prime minister’s ruling coalition, is wanted for two (U.S. and French) embassy bombings in 1983. Military intelligence suspects that Mohammed is a covert Iranian agent who supplies the Shiite insurgency with weapons and information. -the story isn’t getting much attention... at least not yet.

CNN) A man sentenced to death in Kuwait for the 1983 bombings of the U.S. and French embassies now sits in Iraq's parliament as a member of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's ruling coalition, according to U.S. military intelligence.

Jamal Jafaar Mohammed's seat in parliament gives him immunity from prosecution. Washington says he supports Shiite insurgents and acts as an Iranian agent in Iraq.

U.S. military intelligence in Iraq has approached al-Maliki's government with the allegations against Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, whom it says assists Iranian special forces in Iraq as "a conduit for weapons and political influence."

Mohammed is also wanted in connection to an assassination attempt of a Kuwaiti prince as well as the hijacking of a Kuwaiti airliner.

I know Iraq is a shitstorm but how the hell can a man who was convicted of bombing a US embassy be part of the Iraqi parliament and in a position to work as an Iranian agent? I’m not going to go into the, is this what we're fighting for bullshit but it begs the question: How many other bombers, terrorists and spies work for the “Democracy” that so many Americans have been killed for?

Liberal Retardation At Its Most Retarded

Only in the mind of a New York Times columnist can the Super Bowl commercials, which aired last night, be construed as being representative of the violent nature of the war in Iraq. And only a pitiful soul would actually try to link advertisements with the war.

Super Bowl Ads of Cartoonish Violence, Perhaps Reflecting Toll of War:

No commercial that appeared last night during Super Bowl XLI directly addressed Iraq, unlike a patriotic spot for Budweiser beer that ran during the game two years ago. But the ongoing war seemed to linger just below the surface of many of this year’s commercials.

More than a dozen spots celebrated violence in an exaggerated, cartoonlike vein that was intended to be humorous, but often came across as cruel or callous.
For instance, in a commercial for Bud Light beer, sold by Anheuser-Busch, one man beat the other at a game of rock, paper, scissors by throwing a rock at his opponent’s head.

In another Bud Light spot, face-slapping replaced fist-bumping as the cool way for people to show affection for one another. In a FedEx commercial, set on the moon, an astronaut was wiped out by a meteor. In a spot for Snickers candy, sold by Mars, two co-workers sought to prove their masculinity by tearing off patches of chest hair…

Then, too, there was the unfortunate homonym at the heart of a commercial from Prudential Financial, titled “What Can a Rock Do?”

The problem with the spot, created internally at Prudential, was that whenever the announcer said, “a rock” — invoking the Prudential logo, the rock of Gibraltar — it sounded as if he were saying, yes, “Iraq.”
-H/T: Hot Air

The ongoing war seemed to linger just below the surface of many of this year's commercials? Really? And because the Prudential logo is the rock of Gibraltar and the voice-over said “a rock”, which sounds like Iraq, it somehow proves or lends credence to the argument that the war has turned American advertisers into violent loving, callous executives? -I have to assume he blames George Bush for this?

Radical Imam Gives DNC Prayer

I wanted to post a nonpolitical story today because tomorrow is Super Sunday and I thought, why not write something uplifting. Unfortunately, the Democratic National Committee couldn’t go one day without expressing solidarity with our enemies.

Hot Air has video of an Islamic Imam providing the DNC with an opening prayer calling for the end of American oppression and occupation of Iraq. The Imam’s name is Husham Al-Hussainy and he has been an avid supporter of Hezbollah and an avid hater of the United States. So naturally, the Democrats felt it necessary to invite him to open their Winter Meeting. -
Video and Background Here-

Al Hussainy’s remarks to the DNC: We thank you god, to bless us among your creations. We thank you, god, to make us a great nation. We thank you, god toss send us your messages through our father Abraham, and Jesus and Mohammed, through you, god, we unite, so guide us to the right spot we wish for peace, equality and help us to stop the war and violence, and oppression and occupation.

And the Democratic Party, led by Howard Dean, is confused why so many Americans question their loyalty and their patriotism. At every turn they are sympathizing with terrorists, undermining the war in Iraq, leaking national security secrets, and slandering the U.S. Military. Somehow, I doubt inviting a radical America-Hating Imam to give their opening prayer is going to quell any public concerns.

Oh, Did I Offend You

I didn’t get upset when Michael Richards used the “N” word to attack a group of morons interrupting his show; I thought it was funny. I didn’t get offended when senator Biden described Barack Obama as a clean African-American. And I certainly don’t care if someone uses the word fag in a derogatory way.

I like to offend people because it’s natural. And racial epithets is the easiest way to do so.

See, if I use the word fag, like I used in a recent post, some people will call me a homophobe. However, to me, the assumption that because I use the word fag, I somehow hate homosexuals, is far more offensive than the word itself. It’s offensive because of the hypocrisy. Because the people lobbing the homophobe charge have their prejudices and for them to pretend like they're atop the hierarchy of moral authority makes them self-absorbed liars. And if you understand that, then you understand one of the key reasons I despise many liberal-Americans.

This is the same in almost all aspects of society. Take, for example, the war in Iraq and these recent protests. Most of the people protesting don’t really care about the people dying in Iraq and most don’t even care about the U.S. servicemen in that country. But they pretend to care because pretending to care allows them to claim a moral authority. These protesters didn’t care that 3 million people were slaughtered after we withdrew from Vietnam, just like they didn’t care about the Iraqis under Saddam Hussein. They don’t care about those lives because it’s not expedient for them... it wasn’t helpful to care. Only when it benefits their need to feel morally superior, does it matter to them.

Do you know that there is a genocide going on in Africa as I type? Do you know how bad the situation is in Darfur? But you don’t see any outrage coming from anybody. And do you know why there is no real outrage? It’s because those people who crave moral authority have crowned the United Nations, and its anti-Americanism, as the beacon of morality. And since the situation in Darfur is a consequence of the UN’s inaction, any dissent or condemnation weakens not only the ascribed authority of the UN but the moral gravitas of the self-important liberal agenda.

So fuck you, you fag, you spic, you cracker and you bitch!!! we have real problems in this world and I don’t have time for your hypocritical outrage, okay! If you go through life being offended at jokes or at words then just do us all a favor and jump off a fuckin’ cliff. -or cry us a damn river so we can drown your sensitive ass.