Obama: Genocide Is Okay With Me

Barack Obama said yesterday that mass slaughter and unimaginable suffering is no reason to use military force; claiming that the risk of genocide should not be taken into account when deciding to pull out or stay in Iraq.

Of course he said this in an effort to rally anti-war support; not with actual human life in mind. -which is typical liberalism. They only pretend to care about life when it suits them politically (more Americans have been murdered in California in the past few years alone, then troops have died in combat in both Afghanistan and Iraq).

SUNAPEE, N.H. (AP) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.

"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now—where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife—which we haven't done," Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press.


"We would be deploying unilaterally and occupying the Sudan, which we haven't done. Those of us who care about Darfur don't think it would be a good idea," he said.

His argument is that why should we stay in Iraq to prevent genocide if we’re not already in Sudan and Congo. My argument is, that the only way to stop the genocide in Africa is by the use of military force. Because while the UN and self-righteous entertainers are putting on their little “awareness” concerts, millions of people are dying.


By the time people like Obama are done singing Kumbaya and making Darfur commercials, there won’t be any people left for these maniacs to kill. They’ll all be dead already